User talk:The Great Editor In Chief

hi
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/The_Great_Editor_In_Chief#Questions_for_the_candidate



Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, The Great Editor In Chief! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Mifter (talk) 21:22, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

New Messages from Mifter
--Mifter (talk) 21:24, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

New Messages from Mifter
--Mifter (talk) 22:01, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

New Messages from Mifter
--Mifter (talk) 23:07, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi
Yes I said you are sock puppet I am kidding with you because you use toooo sweet language and there is a smell of flattering in your talks don't take it seriously since i am a member of project fun i need to spread smile :P ;) and other big reason is that you dont have a userpage 123.236.2.43 (talk) 03:25, 9 July 2008 (UTC) enjoy wikipedia

New Messages from Mifter
--Mifter (talk) 02:19, 10 July 2008 (UTC)   A R  TYOM    18:49, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Your RFA
If you're serious about your RFA you should add it to the top of the main RFA page's nomination section by adding. --Patar knight - chat/contributions 13:29, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Please do not edit other people's RFAs! MSGJ (talk) 15:58, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I have closed your RfA early per WP:NOTNOW as it stood little chance of passing, and keeping it running would have done no good. You might want to have a look at admin coaching before running again; please don't think this a personal judgement about you, and keep up the good editing work!  RichardΩ612  Ɣ ɸ 18:25, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Please do not remove the comments from your now closed RfA. S. Dean Jameson 18:47, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Tim Russert
Please do not remove (and revert) entire sections of established articles without discussion. The part you removed was a piece of a merge undertaken after much discussion. Further removal will be reverted. S. Dean Jameson 18:53, 13 July 2008 (UTC) --S. Dean Jameson (talk) 21:32, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * If you continue to refuse to discuss your removal of text from an agreed-upon merge, I'm certain you will be blocked for tendentious editing. Consider this a warning. S. Dean Jameson 21:34, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

You are quite entitled to remove the comments of other users - however editing them to change the meaning or tone is strictly prohibited and if you persist, you may be blocked. --Allemandtando (talk) 22:00, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Your username
Is clever :) I did think people were referring to Jimbo for a bit....  I hope you enjoy editing here as much as the name indicates.  Cheers, Wikidemo (talk) 22:00, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Please note his editing history. S. Dean Jameson 22:01, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

I have started a thread regarding your behavior at WP:ANI
Here is the link to the thread discussing your behavior. S. Dean Jameson 22:04, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

The account with this username has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because of concerns that the chosen username may not meet our username policy.


 * This is often not a reflection on the user, and you are encouraged to choose a new account name which does meet our guidelines and are invited to contribute to Wikipedia under an appropriate username. If you feel this block was made in error, you may quickly and easily appeal it - see below.

Our username policy provides guidance on selecting your username. In brief, usernames should not be offensive, disruptive, promotional, related to a 'real-world' group or organization, confusing, or misleading. Also, usernames may not end with the string "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

If you have already made edits and wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name you may request a change in username. To do so, please follow these directions:
 * Add below. This is possible because even when you are blocked, you can still edit your own talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note, you may only request a name that is not already in use. The account is created upon acceptance – do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change since we can far easier allocate your new name to you, if it is not yet used. Usernames that have already been taken are listed here. For more information, please visit Changing username. Keep in mind, though, that creating a new account is much faster and easier.

Last, the automated software systems that prevent vandalism may have been activated, which can cause new account creation to be blocked also. If you have not acted in a deliberately inappropriate manner, please let us know if this happens, and we will deactivate the block as soon as possible. You may also appeal this username block by adding the text below or emailing the administrator who blocked you.


 * For your information, the reason for the username block was because Editor in Chief implies a position of responsibility and oversight on Wikipedia, which does not exist, and may be confusing to new users. &rArr;   SWAT Jester    Son of the Defender  02:06, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I support this username block, for the reasons given. Gwen Gale (talk) 13:50, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I would have preferred RFC/NAME, but given that he doesn't want to discuss, I support the indefblock as well. · AndonicO  Engage. 18:09, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Strongly oppose any unblock. This account has all the hallmarks of another GENIUS(4th power) sock. – iride  scent  18:10, 15 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose unblock; the original block reason is appropriate, and the attempt to falsely accuse another editor is wildly inappropriate, regardless of username. The unblock request only addresses the problematic username, not the bad behavior that originally triggered the block. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 03:04, 16 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Strongly oppose any unblock. This user has proven himself to be acting in bad faith, not just with the username, but with the malicious altering of my comments, and his follow-up attempt to smear me using the trumped-up (by him) comments. S. Dean Jameson 03:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment This user has wantonly deleted cited content. The username is clearly an helpful ploy. Gwen Gale (talk) 03:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * This was one of my encounters with this editor, and one of the several reasons I think he should stay indef-blocked. S. Dean Jameson 03:51, 16 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment I see a 24-hour block for disruption and an indefinate block for bad username. According to our username policy, he should be unblocked to choose another username (when the 24-hour block for disruption expires).  Since this didn't happen, I assume there is more to the story.  Please adjust the blocking templates above accordingly for clarity.  Thanks.  --Philosopher Let us reason together. 23:54, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It is clearly stated above, and below, that the account is now indef blocked for disruption. Jehochman Talk 00:33, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Protection
You were blocked for faking messages from others. Faking an unblock acceptance was not very helpful. Since you've made it so clear that you are not interested in editing appropriately, you will not need further access to this talk page. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC)