User talk:The Herald/Archive 3

Speedy deletion nomination of Biophytum sensitivum


A tag has been placed on Biophytum sensitivum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22837955. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, seeRequesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a questionhere.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nominationby visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:08, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Joe Heck
Joe Heck has many links. It was recently vandalized which I inadvertently restored then removed again. Cheers Jim1138 (talk)
 * Please explain why you think a biography of a member of the U.S. House of Representatives should be deleted? That makes no sense to me. Is this a misunderstanding based on a vandalized state of the article?  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  17:25, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 October 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 23:29, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Hännikäinen
Hi. I noticed you added an "additional citations" template to Hännikäinen. But why would citations be needed in a disambiguation page?

Cheers, --Frglz (talk) 16:06, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, was that a disambiguation page?? Please see WP:D for details regarding the creation of such page...
 * Well, technically it's a surname page, but that's the same thing, right?--Frglz(talk) 16:15, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * In that case, you should change the title to disambiguation page... Benison  talk with me
 * Well, John, Bob, Kocian, and Bogdan aren't named that way.--Frglz(talk) 18:58, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Super Bowl XLVIII
[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Super_Bowl_XLVIII&diff=578833698&oldid=578628681 this] is vandalism, the teams playing in the Super Bowl won't be known until after the playoffs.Frietjes (talk) 16:36, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 03:46, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

GA reassessment
Benison P Baby, you added a template to Newton's laws of motion but you didn't edit the review page (Good article reassessment/Newton's laws of motion/1 and provide your reasons for starting this review. If you don't do that, the review should probably be closed. Please see theinstructions for GAR. RockMagnetist(talk) 05:36, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I have removed the template. RockMagnetist (talk) 02:07, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay. By the way, thanks for remembering. I would do the the needs if possible.Benison  talk with me 13:41, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Bigg Boss 7
Kushal is the current captain of the house and also Guest appearances. So please can you tell me why you reverted the edits? TanmayRaoM (talk) 15:53, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Citations are necessary when making such changes which you can get easily from many websites. So next time, please do add citations. BTW, thanks for your contributions in the article. Benison  talk with me 12:31, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Yes I forgot to add comments and citations. I will make sure ill do that .TanmayRaoM (talk) 16:44, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Warnings
Hi Benison. Thank you for your efforts to revert vandalism in Wikipedia. But I realized after you had reverted their edits, you did not warn them. Please warn them with the correct warning templates. You can warn them using Twinkle. Thanks.  Jianhui67 talk ★ contribs 12:17, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Of course I would surely do that from next time. Thanks for the info.. Happy editing..Benison  talk with me 12:19, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Jutarnji list
Please stop removign sourced information.--78.3.4.155 (talk) 14:08, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Please check your talk page.......

Which portion you find "unsourced" about lost lawsuit vs Thompson?? because there are several sources. In Croatian, though, but still are reliable sources. We can find verdict as well — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.2.157.129 (talk) 11:31, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 October newsletter
The WikiCup is over for another year! Our champion, for the second year running, is. Our final nine were as follows:

All those who reached the final win prizes, and prizes will also be going to the following participants:


 * wins the FA prize, for four featured articles in round 4, worth 400 points.
 * wins the GA prize, for 20 good articles in round 3, worth 600 points.
 * wins the FL prize, for four featured lists in round 2, worth 180 points.
 * wins the FP prize, for 23 featured pictures in round 5, worth 805 point.
 * wins the FPo prize, for 2 featured portals in round 3, worth 70 points.
 * wins the topic prize, for a 23-article featured topic in round 5, worth 230 points.
 * wins the DYK prize, for 79 did you know articles in round 5, worth 570 points.
 * wins the ITN prize, for 23 in the news articles in round 4, worth 270 points.
 * wins the GAR prize, for 24 good article reviews in round 1, worth 96 points.
 * The judges are awarding the Oddball Barnstar to, for some curious contributions in earlier rounds.
 * Finally, the judges are awarding the Geography Barnstar for her work on sea, now a featured article. This top-importance article was the highest-scoring this year; when it was promoted to FA status, Cwmhiraeth could claim 720 points.

Prizes will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who has been successful in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and a particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition. While it has been an excellent year, errors have opened up the judges' eyes to the need for a third judge, and it is with pleasure that we announce that experienced WikiCup participantMiyagawa will be acting as a judge from now on. We hope you will all join us in welcoming him to the team.

Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. Brainstorming and discussion remains open for how next year's competition will work, and straw polls will be opened by the judges soon. Those interested in friendly competition may also like to keep an eye on the stub contest, being organised by Casliber. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2014 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17(talk • email) 01:28, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on theSuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), currentassessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know onSuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 October 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 22:58, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Films set in the future
Thank you for warning me about that. You are right; I will use the plot sumary to explain my edit then. - 201.6.205.15 (talk) 06:49, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014
Hi, if you haven't already, you should consider signing up for WikiCup 2014. Cheers, --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 02:18, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages
 * -- 19:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)