User talk:The Jayhawker

Unspecified source for Image:Larry_Scott.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Larry_Scott.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bigr Tex  15:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Warning
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. WLU 20:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. WLU 22:44, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Perhaps next time you should use the proper templates rather than pasting them from your own talk page - before I reverted them, it looked like I was warning myself.


 * Incidentally, who are you reporting me to in your personification of wikipedia? Jimbo Wales?  You might be better trying the administrator's noticeboard, though you should try some talk pages first.  WLU


 * That's fantastic - you've yet to provide a reason for deleting the image, you have several dedicated contributors who disagree with your edits. Do you know what the three revert rule is?  You can get blocked for violating it.  What're your objections to it?  To date, you haven't posted on any talk pages registering your objections to it, though several other users have.  If it is in fact, you, you should see wikipedia's policy on sockpuppets.  Also:

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. WLU 16:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. WLU 16:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Bodybuilding
I've blocked you for 24 hours for revert warring at Bodybuilding. You have over 3 reverts of the same image edit in the past 24 hours.--Isotope23 16:18, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

I understand and have sent you an e-mail. I hope this is solved and the spirit of Wikipedia is preserved. --The Jayhawker 16:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Concerning bodybuilder image
Please stop deleting the bodybuilder image on the pages it is being used on. It has clearly been explained that this is the best image we have for the purposes due to it's quality. The individual in the image may not be as large as some other professional bodybuilders however the image itself is better in quality than the others which are usable on Wikipedia, which means that if you want the image taken down you'll need to upload a better one which is free of copyrights and is usable for wikipedia. It has been clearly explained on the talk pages by myself and numerous other editors that the image is a good image and should be used in those pages it's being used in. Simply deleting the image without a consensus and labeling anyone who adds it as a "vandal" is itself vandalism and contrary to how Wikipedia works. If you want the image removed, since it keeps being re-added by other users, you will need to gather consensus on the talk pages where the image is placed in order to get it down. As has been clearly stated before, the image is not of me nor is it of a "friend", the image is of a bodybuilder whom per request on a message board provided the image to me and released it's rights so that I could release them for Wikipedia. I do not know this person personally and there is no conflict of interest involved. Thanks.  Wikidudeman  (talk) 10:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC)