User talk:The Lemmick unit in the sin

Dodgy- We have a seperate project called wictionary of dictionary definitions of words. I've deleted the disambiguation page as unneeded. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 20:44, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of 24, THE SERIES (drink)
A tag has been placed on 24, THE SERIES (drink), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 18:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

RAC 125 (drink)
Another editor has added the  template to the article RAC 125 (drink), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 19:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC) Please consider placing A tag has been placed on RAC 125 (drink), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

It's bullshit!

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 86.29.249.252 (talk) 14:37, 27 February 2008 (UTC) on the User Talk page of the author. --86.29.249.252 (talk) 14:37, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of RAC 125 (drink)
An article that you have been involved in editing, RAC 125 (drink), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/RAC 125 (drink). Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 21:05, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Push off!
Push off!--The Lemmick unit in the sin (talk) 14:50, 27 February 2008 (UTC) WANKERS!--The Lemmick unit in the sin (talk) 09:13, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because of concerns that the chosen username may not meet our username policy.


 * This is often not a reflection on the user, and you are encouraged to choose a new account name which does meet our guidelines and are invited to contribute to Wikipedia under an appropriate username. If you feel this block was made in error, you may quickly and easily appeal it - see below.

Our username policy provides guidance on selecting your username. In brief, usernames should not be offensive, disruptive, promotional, related to a 'real-world' group or organization, confusing, or misleading.

If you have already made edits and wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name you may request a change in username which is quick and easy. To do so, please follow these directions:
 * Add  This is possible because even when you are blocked, you can still edit your own talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note, you may only request a name that is not already in use. The account is created upon acceptance – do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change since we can far easier allocate your new name to you, if it is not yet used. Usernames that have already been taken are listed here. For more information, please visit Changing username.

Last, the automated software systems that prevent vandalism may have been activated, which can cause new account creation to be blocked also. If you have not acted in a deliberately inappropriate manner, please let us know if this happens, and we will deactivate the block as soon as possible. You may also appeal this username block by adding the text  or emailing the administrator who blocked you. --86.29.245.241 (talk) 14:39, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

WTF
Seriously, don't you have anything better to do? This whole thing with the IPs and socks is pretty deep. You should consider finding a nice boyfriend or girlfriend or taking up a hobby or a sport or something. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 20:17, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

This is your only warning
If you spam anymore talk pages with this message, this account will actually be blocked indefinitely. Natalie (talk) 13:55, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Nonsense of Sweating bomb
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sweating bomb, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sweating bomb provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sweating bomb, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Lulz
I'll bet this guy is sockpuppeting for the lulz. &mdash; Rickyrab | Talk 21:09, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

I am Lulz,

I confess!--The Lemmick unit in the sin (talk) 09:13, 24 April 2008 (UTC)