User talk:The Lie Detector

Galloway
Its not a big deal we don't need to add all and sundry about it. Off2riorob (talk) 21:56, 9 January 2010 (UTC)


 * What is a "sundry" and what does that material have to do with George Galloway? The Lie Detector (talk) 22:02, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Blogs
Of whatever description are not wikipedia reliable sources, please take your timr here and read some of our editing policies this is about citations WP:RS please do not reinsert this citation. Off2riorob (talk) 22:12, 9 January 2010 (UTC)


 * LIE DETECTED! Left-wing blogs relating to Indymedia are already cited as sourced on Galloway's pages. The Lie Detector (talk) 22:14, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * BEEP BEEP BEEP As is www.swp.org.uk and vivapalestina.org! The Lie Detector (talk) 22:18, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

That is another issue, your citation fails the reliability status, also your edit summary of a bit more detail about how Galloways friends murdered an Egyptian policeman is very opinionated and attacks a living person, please as I said take your time, this is not a place to come and attack living people. Off2riorob (talk) 22:17, 9 January 2010 (UTC)


 * LIE DETECTED! Looks like someone refuses to even read the source cited, which accurately states the information. The Lie Detector (talk) 22:19, 9 January 2010 (UTC)


 * If you have issues about other citations, go to the talkpage of the article and add a comment regarding them there. Off2riorob (talk) 22:20, 9 January 2010 (UTC)


 * LIES DETECTED Either remove all blogs, or keep all blogs. Don't be a silly left-wing partisan. Don't protect sources you like just because you like them. The Lie Detector (talk) 22:23, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article George Galloway, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Off2riorob (talk) 22:26, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Left-wing blogs removed. There you go. I can't wait to see you revert and then defend your rank immoral hipocracy. The Lie Detector (talk) 22:33, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to George Galloway. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. RolandR (talk) 23:24, 9 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Beep. This is America, not Saudi Arabia. The Lie Detector (talk) 23:34, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on George Galloway. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. RolandR (talk) 23:38, 9 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, I'm glad that I'm defending Wikipedia from lefist liars. And your point is? The Lie Detector (talk) 23:39, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to George Galloway. HappyInGeneral (talk) 23:40, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: Talk:George Galloway. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RolandR (talk) 23:40, 9 January 2010 (UTC)


 * You can lie all you want, I expect you to, but the important thing is that- Beep- you get detected. The Lie Detector (talk) 23:41, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Welcome!

 * Next time please consult the core policies and be WP:CIVIL. That will get you not only accepted but also a valued member of the Wikipedia project. Best Regards, --HappyInGeneral (talk) 23:53, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Your editing privileges have been indefinitely suspended
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Please note that indefinite does not mean "forever", but for as long as it is apparent that you edit on the basis of countering "left wing"ism. All viewpoints are welcome, as long as they can be sourced to reliable third party sources, because incorporating all should result in WP:NPOV. You have been previously been made aware of WP:BLP, and the requirement that only WP:RS is permitted - especially where there are negative aspects to material - but you should also be aware that same sourced content cannot be removed other for encyclopedic considerations (i.e. it is not notable) and referenced material may be excluded for the same reason; just because it is referenced does not mean it is inherently notable with regard to the subject matter. You may need to indicate your understanding of these distinctions should you choose to contest this block. LessHeard vanU (talk) 00:25, 10 January 2010 (UTC)