User talk:The Lutterworth Press

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Novaseminary (talk) 15:04, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Manual of Style

Link Spamming
Please do not edit articles for advertising purposes. Link spam is contrary to Wikipedia policies and will only badly damage The Lutterworth Press' reputation. Thank you. Afterwriting (talk) 15:34, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Continued link spaming
Please stop link spamming/book spamming as you did on Frank Lake and Pastoral counseling. As noted before, it violates Wikipedia policy. Novaseminary (talk) 14:24, 22 February 2010 (UTC)


 * We believe that this book adds to the content of the article, as it is on pastoral counseling and explains the teachings of Frank Lake. Apologies if the link was erroneously put in the Reference section initially and please advise if you still consider this to be spamming.Thanks The Lutterworth Press (talk) 17:19, 22 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Since you apparently have a conlfict of interest, you should make suggestions in the talk/discussion page of the articles you think the book is appropriate for (it will probably continue to be removed if you contniue to add it, and you may be blocked from editing). Keep in mind, though, that Wikipedia is not a repository of relevant articles and books. For more on that see WP:NOTREPOSITORY and WP:NOTDIRECTORY. If the book is a source for a fact presented in the article, it might be appropriate as an inline reference. Otherwise, it probably should be left out. Novaseminary (talk) 18:31, 22 February 2010 (UTC)