User talk:The Optimistic One/Archive 8

Orphaned non-free image File:KimWexlerBCS.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:KimWexlerBCS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MikeEhrmantrautBB.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:MikeEhrmantrautBB.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NachoVargaBCS.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:NachoVargaBCS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KimWexlerBCS.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:KimWexlerBCS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NachoVargaBCS.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:NachoVargaBCS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HowardHamlinBCS.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:HowardHamlinBCS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MikeEhrmantrautBB.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:MikeEhrmantrautBB.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Irish articles
Please see MOS:IMOS BIOPLACE, For people anywhere else in Ireland at any time, "Ireland" should be used. Should pipelinking be considered necessary, Ireland can be used after 1922. FDW777 (talk) 14:39, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * But that doesn't apply to people born before 1922. I don't see the issue in linking. The Optimistic One (talk) 14:42, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, it does. It says For people anywhere else in Ireland at any time, "Ireland" should be used. So it does apply to people before 1922. See also Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Ireland-related articles/Archive 8, Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Ireland-related articles/Archive 9 and no doubt other archived discussions where piped links like Ireland were objected to because the same standard is never applied to articles about England, Scotland and Wales.
 * If you would like to change the consensus, please start a new discussion at WT:IMOS. FDW777 (talk) 14:46, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

European American
Why did you label Tommy Wiseau a European American with this edit? Is there a reliable source that states that he explicitly self identifies as "European American"? Mitchumch (talk) 13:06, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Please ignore my question. I should have been more diligent in reviewing the article. Mitchumch (talk) 14:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

First and last parameters
Please don't ever add them again to character infoboxes as they are not properly supported by Template:Infobox character and will soon be deprecated. Instead, follow the example here. was right to revert your edits on Daniel Sousa. -- Kailash29792 (talk)  04:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)


 * I mean why are they going to be deprecated? The current format is just unnecessary. The year is just fine without adding the full date to make everything more bloated. I much prefer the older parameters. The Optimistic One (talk) 14:06, 3 September 2020 (UTC)


 * And you could have asked me in a more polite manner. Your tone isn't getting you anywhere The Optimistic One (talk) 22:35, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Drake & Josh


The page Draft:Drake & Josh has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://drakejosh.wordpress.com/2009/11/21/believe-me-brother/ etc. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:22, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Johnny (The Room) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Johnny (The Room) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Johnny (The Room) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:12, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Six Ulster counties of Northern Ireland
Thanks. Yes there are nine counties in Ulster as is made clear in the text (see Partition). But the six in Northern Ireland are Ulster counties and that perhaps is important to mention here at the outset so as to account for the term Ulster Unionism.05:29, 16 September 2020 (UTC)ManfredHugh (talk)

Your GA nomination of Better Call Saul (season 2)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Better Call Saul (season 2) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Heartfox -- Heartfox (talk) 04:01, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Better Call Saul (season 5)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Better Call Saul (season 5) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Heartfox -- Heartfox (talk) 04:02, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Better Call Saul (season 2)
The article Better Call Saul (season 2) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Better Call Saul (season 2) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Heartfox -- Heartfox (talk) 05:21, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Better Call Saul (season 2)
The article Better Call Saul (season 2) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Better Call Saul (season 2) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Heartfox -- Heartfox (talk) 03:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 All-Ireland Senior Football Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Carr.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Better Call Saul (season 5)
The article Better Call Saul (season 5) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Better Call Saul (season 5) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Heartfox -- Heartfox (talk) 06:21, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of The Bridge (The Walking Dead) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Bridge (The Walking Dead), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Triggerfinger (The Walking Dead) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:09, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 in professional wrestling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pat Patterson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Haas
Hi. I have a question. I watched the interview and, as far as I know, he just says he and Gayda divorced, but not when. 2020 is the date when he informed, but not the date when the couple divorced. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 18:19, 16 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Can you find any sources about it? It more than likely happened this year. The Optimistic One (talk) 19:16, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 * More likely, but not confirmed. The source only says they divorced, but not when. Any interpretation is WP:OR. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 09:25, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history. Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision diffs
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks!

Disambiguation link notification for December 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Planet of the Apes characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Rosenthal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021


This is to warn you of your recent Vandilism on the article History of WWE. Your addition of the so called "covid-19 era" is pure Original Research which is strictly forbidden as per Wikipedia guidlines, and pandemics like Spanish Flu existed before, and though WWWF wasn't established in 1918, the wrestling industry did and was affected by it too just like any other businesses, just because a business does not function as usual under a pandemic situation doesn't mean the start of a new era. A new era begins when WWE themselves announces it, and when there are Reliable Sources, but your edit was entirely your personal opinion which is not allowed. You have been warned before for such vandalism, most of which have been archived as viewable on your talk page revision history. next time you vandalize the article based on your personal views you will be reported and may be blocked form editing. Please refrain form it and see the WP:NOR guideline very carefully! But asThank you. Dilbaggg (talk) 04:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Don't you mean vandalism? Also, why don't you actually do some research next time before sending me this nonsense. Vandalism is a deliberate deconstruction of an article. I believe you owe me an apology and a redact. The Optimistic One (talk) 21:27, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Maybe I was a bit harsh on you, we all make mistakes, I am supposed to Assume Good Faith, and I apologise for that. But hope you understand your edit was original research, which is not allowed. Just wait for WWE to announce the next era, then you may add it after they do. Best wishes. Dilbaggg (talk) 23:47, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Infobox
Why revert the infobox to the "clumpier" format? The major/minor/date fields offer a more consistent display of this kind of information of e.g. franchise/episode/date. --EEMIV (talk) 15:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I just don't feel like their the better choice. I prefer the simpler parameters. The Optimistic One (talk) 16:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, and thanks for the quick response. I lean toward taking advantage of the granular parameters in the template because there might be benefits to e.g. scraping Wikipedia content over to things like Wikidata and then on to other projects that benefit from that repository. That said, I don't know whether that is actively happening regarding this particular template, so not worth fussing over now -- and for the general Wikipedia reader, the information is still clear. But in general I think it's advantageous to take advantage of opportunities to discretely structure data. --EEMIV (talk) 18:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * That's good. Glad we're aligned. Appreciate hearing your opinion. Enjoy your day! The Optimistic One (talk) 19:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Better Call Saul (season 5)
The article Better Call Saul (season 5) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Better Call Saul (season 5) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Piemonte Calcio
Piemonte Calcio is the fictional name the videogame FIFA has had to give Juventus in their game due to licensing issues with PES. It's non-existent, and shouldn't really be made part of Wikipedia. Nehme1499 22:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I just think it's convenient that way. When readers unfamiliar with the club search for Piemonte, they're actually searching for Juventus; not the video game. The Optimistic One (talk) 22:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, I'm Oblow14. Your recent edit(s) to the page Konrad de la Fuente appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Oblow14 (talk) 21:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2006 in professional wrestling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Elliott.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Nobel Team (Halo)


Hello, The Optimistic One. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nobel Team".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  12:06, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European Super League.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Tolkien "series"
Hi, and thanks for your well-meant intention to improve the Tolkien character infoboxen. However, while the "first appeared in" and "last..." may work brilliantly when an SF author has put a character in 13 of 25 nearly-identical books about travels with ray-gun in hand to planets A thru Z, the same is not at all true of Tolkien. Basically, all the LOTR characters appear in the book, which isn't a trilogy, and then (or is it before) they appear in Book of Lost Tales or Unfinished Tales or what have you, and then (or was it before) they are mentioned in a footnote in the Silmarillion, and suddenly the reader is confronted with a series that ... isn't a time-series in any sense that can be discerned by anybody without a) an SF planet-sized brain b) fluent Anglo-Saxon and c) intimate knowledge of the whole of Tolkien's legendarium as spelt out in mind-bogglingly boring detail by Christopher T ... in short, trying to jam the thing into a First ... Last sequence is doomed to miserable failure, and ... perhaps I've made my meaning clear. It doesn't work, basta. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:54, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pro Evolution Soccer 4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roma.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, I'm User: Ethan2345678. I noticed that you added or changed in an article,  but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ethan2345678 (talk) 00:52, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
 * For the record, this is a BLP violation performed through a POV. Not only you didn't read the cases when it is used, you directly enforced it. (CC) Tb hotch ™ 22:11, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
 * How? He was trailed and convicted on two charges, which is stated in the article right now for you to see. I just simply added the information into his infobox in good faith? And what do you mean I directly enforced it!? Elaborate further The Optimistic One (talk) 22:58, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
 * As you clearly didn't read Aoi's summary: "This template is generally reserved for convicted serial killers, gangsters, mass murderers, old west outlaws, murderers, mafia members, fugitives, FBI 10 Most Wanted, serial rapists, mobsters, and other notorious criminals. [...] Infobox criminal is rarely used where notability is not due primarily to the person being a convicted criminal." (CC) Tb hotch ™ 23:01, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah I read it, and did I revert Aoi's edit??? Also I done that after reading Adam Johnson's bio, who also faced similar circumstances to Drake Bell. I believe your overreacting to this matter. The Optimistic One (talk) 23:08, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm RossButsy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Raphaël Varane have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks..

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

MOS:CURLY – a MoS policy
Please make sure to follow MOS:CURLY, a MoS policy. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

MOS:DUPLINK – a MoS policy
Please make sure to follow MOS:DUPLINK, a MoS policy. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:56, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vikings (season 5), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emperor Charles.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Ole Gunnar Solskjær
Read the Guardian article and the edit history of his article. Seasider53 (talk) 02:33, 21 November 2021 (UTC)