User talk:The Parsnip!/Archive Nov 2007

Signpost updated for October 22nd, 2007.
Sorry for the tardiness in sending the Signpost this week. --Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:58, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 29th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:19, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Images
I am truly lazy about certain things. The two biggest things are autowikibrowser and wikicommons. I am very unlikely to expend my time moving my images, but am not against them being moved. However, if they are moved, I do not check on common often and if they are in violation, I would miss notices. Last month I recieved notices about several images needing fair use rationales.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 00:09, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

"worst films" page
Please do not re-add The Star Wars Holiday Special. While it is true that there are such things as TV Movies, the Holiday special is not considered one and TV movies are not generally considered on the same level as theatrical films, so would not belong in this article in any case. Thanks. Rhindle The Red 01:41, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * You find me one reliable source that considers it a film and I'll leave it alone. I'll give you a week. Rhindle The Red 04:26, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * No, the Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source. The use in the article just means somebody else is making the same mistake you are.  As for the categories, it would be silly to create separate categories for TV specials of this nature as compared to real films.  And just because a TV special utilizes film (therefore needing a film editor), doesn't make the final product a film. As for the 20th Century Fox credit, you don't seriously think that because a company has the word "film" in its name, that makes anything it prodces a film, do you? Rhindle The Red 16:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Past members
I've reverted the change you made on the infobox in the Hawkwind article. The Template:Infobox_Musical_artist guidelines state that members should be listed chronologically, not alphabetically. Also, you added in many people who could only be considered as session musicians or guests, not members. Drwhawkfan 11:00, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Need a hand, please
Hello, ... I'm having trouble with User: regarding their edits to  ... I've posted warnings about needing citations, but they just keep adding, without even so much as an edit summary ...  ... maybe another voice would help? Happy Editing! &mdash; 01:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 5th and 12th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:26, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Sig
Please stop using a misleading signature. - Nobody of consequence 04:09, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * So you know, there's a thread at WP:ANI about this.  W ODU P  05:42, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Yep. I created this account, incidently. Please change your signature. It's quite misleading at the moment. - Ta bu shi da yu 07:14, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

In a somewhat related news, your MfD of Wikipedia:Facebook was speedy closed. Resurgent insurgent (as admin) 10:00, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Mensa International
Hello, ... Do we need to semi-protect this article? There seems to be sockpuppet activity with different WP:SPA anons adding the same POV edit, and some of the ISPs (thnx fer researching &amp; identifying them, BTW) are starting to look familiar ... I'm almost ready to drop this article from my watchlist again because of the increase in trollish activity of late.

On a different note, that brouhaha about yer WP:SIG is pure weapons grade balonium, IMHO! :-) Happy Editing! &mdash; 20:28, 16 November 2007 (UTC)


 * My bad ... not WP:SOCKs, but dynamic IPs
 * and
 * that change at random intervals (or for every connection) ... been there, done that ... still, there is a persistence in this editor's contributions that may justify temporary protection, since a WP:BLOCK will not stop them. -- 72.75.79.128 (talk) 21:01, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * that change at random intervals (or for every connection) ... been there, done that ... still, there is a persistence in this editor's contributions that may justify temporary protection, since a WP:BLOCK will not stop them. -- 72.75.79.128 (talk) 21:01, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Reversion
Why did you revert a change by 204.52.215.13 to that user's own comment? — Bigwyrm watch me wake me 10:14, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks like I made a mistake. I revert a decent amount of IP vandalism so probably just rushed and didn't look closely. Nobody of Consequence 15:50, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Eh. That can happen. No harm done. — Bigwyrm watch me wake me 13:11, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

For your attention...
and. Just thought I'd point out some incivility... Scar ian Talk 21:53, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 19th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:47, 20 November 2007 (UTC)