User talk:The Persian Cataphract

...

Yeah, anything goes here. --The Persian Cataphract (talk) 18:55, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

October 2010
Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: Talk:Battle of the Persian Gate. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please go back and remove the insults, they are completely out of line. Dougweller (talk) 13:15, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

I will not and I care little if I am to be blocked or banned. --The Persian Cataphract (talk) 13:51, 26 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Please see report at WP:ANI. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:13, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked 1 month for harassment. (blocked by –MuZemike 18:23, 27 October 2010 (UTC))

You may contest this block by adding the text below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Your last several comments were absolutely unacceptable, and you well knew that. –MuZemike 18:23, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

You know what else I know being completely unacceptable to all perceived academical practice? Blatant POV-pushing being obstinately reintroduced without opposition.

Since common reasoning with such a character, infused with a classic case of cognitive dissonance, is an impossibility, I will address that person in any shape or form I deem effective and necessary. He is not only an asshole, he is an asshole a thousand times over.

If one random person on the Internet can take academical precedence on a matter of Iranistics, over an editorial board of acclaimed scholars of a specialist compendia who has approved of the referential value of the paper, then it does nothing more than expose the ultimate flaw of Wikipedia; that any idiot can edit the content in order to suit it to their own personal agendas and to boot castigate sources on extremely weak premises. Now that is rude.

So, you know what, being blocked from editing doesn't really mean shit to me. Make it a perma-ban if you wish.--The Persian Cataphract (talk) 12:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)