User talk:The Property Financial

August 2021
Hello, I'm Notfrompedro. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Claude Fenner have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Notfrompedro (talk) 21:21, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, The Property Financial. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Harry Fenner, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Longhair\talk 21:22, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Harry Fenner


A tag has been placed on Draft:Harry Fenner, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:42, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi, Are you able to review my edited version of the page?

August 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  02:01, 11 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Who's "we"? Accounts cannot be shared. Lavalizard101 (talk) 18:27, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi. What do you mean this is not an unblock request. I asked a question?

I drafted a page on Harry Fenner and I've been told it read as being too promotional. I cited sources for the key parts to the article and i didn't feel it read as promotional. I then asked how the article i drafters differs to this Wiki page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Leslau#:~:text=Nick%20Leslau%20(born%2018%20August,Chairman%20of%20Prestbury%20Investments%20LLP.)

Could you tell me why my article is considered promotional but the above isn't?

Thank you

In addition to the above, I ahve read the GNG guidlines and also consider the article/subject meets those conditions. Grateful for a steering as to how Wiki would suggest a 3rd re-write. For context, in the UK Property industry the subject is one of the most relevant people in the UK.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:57, 12 August 2021 (UTC)}} Hi OrangeMike, wonder if you could come back to me on the above.

J
 * The Property Financial, to have any chance of being unblocked, you will need to submit an unblock request. You do that by replacing the text "your reason here" in the unblock template with your actual reasons for wishing to be unblocked. At the very least, you will need to:
 * specify whether more than one person has access to this account, and what you meant by "we"
 * show that you understand why your account was blocked
 * disclose any connection to Harry Fenner – see WP:COI and WP:PAID
 * give us some idea of what non-promotional edits you might wish to make, and on what topics.
 * I also suggest that you consider changing your username to something with a less institutional flavour. Please understand that if your only interest in this project is to promote Fenner, then you are in the wrong place – promotion is not permitted here. You might do better elsewhere. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:14, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

The Property Financial (talk) 15:23, 12 August 2021 (UTC)}}

Hi, could someone review the above?

Regards