User talk:The Real Baby Ace

March 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
 * Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
 * The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'img[0-9]*\.imageshack\.us/img[0-9]*/.*\.jpg' . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to.	Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
 * Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites.	 For more information about me, see my FAQ page.	 Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 19:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Encana subpage
Your subpage on Encana is showing up in the category "Companies listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange". To avoid this problem, could you please remove the template coding around the TSX ticker symbol in the infobox?

Thanks Mlaffs (talk) 13:26, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:The Real Baby Ace/subpage/walgreens environmental record
User:The Real Baby Ace/subpage/walgreens environmental record, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:The Real Baby Ace/subpage/walgreens environmental record and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:The Real Baby Ace/subpage/walgreens environmental record during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 14:00, 6 October 2008 (UTC)  Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 14:00, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:The Real Baby Ace/subpage
User:The Real Baby Ace/subpage, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:The Real Baby Ace/subpage and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:The Real Baby Ace/subpage during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Tikiwont (talk) 08:35, 13 October 2008 (UTC) Tikiwont (talk) 08:35, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Please Investigate Problems on BP (British Petroleum) Wikipedia Page: Intentionally Burying Section on Gulf of Mexico Oil Disaster, Changing Name of Oil Disaster to Hide it
Any attempts to correct this (following reasonable Wikipedia guidelines) are met with aggressive reverts and edits. Intentional spinning and manipulation of article in favor of BP? Can this task force investigate this?

Currently there is no easily recognizable section on the current Gulf of Mexico Oil Disaster, surprisingly since the US Government has held BP responsible. Instead the "Oil Disaster" Section in the article keeps being given obscure (hard to recognize) names (as if someone is trying to hide the section from the public).

That section also keeps getting pushed to the bottom of the article (attempts to bury it)?

It's as if the BP Public Relations department has staff people who are aggressively spinning the article. Could this Task Force investigate this?

75.71.192.54 (talk) 02:57, 17 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.166.179.110 (talk)