User talk:The Rejector

September 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; talk 22:51, 18 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The policy states no such thing. ("Note that warnings are not a prerequisite for blocking"). Your entire editing is done in bad faith. I started to write up an explanation of the problems with your first edits, but when I saw your latest, and (note especially the deceptive edit summaries), I knew I was wasting my time. Also, whose sock are you, please? Bishonen &#124; talk 23:06, 18 September 2017 (UTC).


 * @Bishonen:
 * What makes you think I'm a sock? The Rejector (talk) 23:25, 18 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Several things. You're wrong that you must be warned four times before you're blocked, but the four warnings of increasing severity are actually a well-known trope to experienced users. Not so much to people who have been here for an hour and a half... and extreme newbies usually don't use Wikipedia clichés like "reliable source". But I'm not going to argue about it, because it doesn't matter: sock + vandal, or just vandal, it comes to the same thing: indefinite block. I was just curious. Tell me or not, just as you like; I'm done. Bishonen &#124; talk 00:30, 19 September 2017 (UTC).