User talk:The Rogue Penguin/Archive6

Help! Mayday!
I'm hoping you can help me -- I've got a formatting problem I can't figure out how to fix with the List of Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex episodes article. Some time ago the article was altered into a table. Whoever did this, however, did something wrong. There are images in the article, but not one of them is showin! They're there, in the coding, but they are not showing. This has resulted in virtually every image in the article being declared orpahaned and have been put up for deletion. I experimented in the sandbox with it, but I have not been able to figure out how to fix the problem. HELP!   --Jason Palpatine 13:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The template won't display images, and they're not supposed to be there anyway. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 17:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * To elaborate, episode images have been determined to fail fair use guidelines. –Gunslinger47 17:46, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * News to me. --Jason Palpatine 17:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Just thought you should know, I have put all the images in the article up for deletion. --Jason Palpatine 16:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Images
Hello. Why did you remove the images in List of characters in Ben 10? And whatever happened to all of the previous discussions? Dylan Damien 15:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:DreigenUchiha.jpg
This is taking forever to process:. I'm 100% certain this is copyvio, but I can't find the source to speedy it. If you go to the uploader's webpage ( www.clashoftheshinobi.com ) you can see the larger image in the "Clash of Shinobi Logo". All the rest of his uploads been deleted, but this one is still around. Any suggestions? –Gunslinger47 22:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Advice request
Ok. I'm asking your input. Considering everything that was said in the earlier debate we had, you and the others cited several policies in Wikipedia to explain to me the reasons for the overhauling of the Ben 10 series articles. It was pointed out in the discussion, that it is (I understand) the prevailing view that this should be done to the many other such episodic articles here I referenced. If this is the case, perhaps I should also start working with you guys in the same direction -- would that be alright with you? My real objection in the case of Ben 10, is that is is uniqe here. Many of the other such listed series have a seperate Wik site set up for each of them, like Star Trek and Stargate SG-1. Given that these other shows have dedicated specialized Wik sites, I never saw any need for such extesivism here in the general Wikipedia. What I want to know is if it would be proper or not for me to even suggest acting in these areas along the same lines? Or should I keep my mouth shut and hands off? Your advice would be VERY appreciated. Sincerly; Jason Palpatine 07:37, 11 May 2007 (UTC)


 * You could if you wanted to, but I don't really see the point. It's something off-this-Wiki that you'd have to do yourself. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 07:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)


 * You "don't really see the point"? You are -- IMHO -- one of the best and most knowlegeable admins here. If that is what you mean.  OTOH -- if you mean my inkling to put up for discussion aplying the policies that were  implemented with BEN 10 elsewhere here.  I am not -- as our earlier discussions show -- in your league.  I just didn't want to step up to homeplate and make a fool of myself before everyone here. Thanks.  I'll work on a proposal and post it at the appropriate talk page.  Whith your permission, I'll notify you here when I do.  May be a while though, I am going on a business trip next week. -- Jason Palpatine 10:22, 11 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm not an admin, just so we're clear on that. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 16:55, 11 May 2007 (UTC)


 * You sure fooled me. Your inside-knowledge of Wikipedia's workings made a good impression.  Sure had me fooled.  --Jason Palpatine 17:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Prove it
Prove that that naruto hurricane chronicles is coming to the US next year from a website to see where u got your data otherwise it is fake and what u r doing is vadleism for say lies about shoen jump that they have not announced.

U need to stop belveing evering on the internet.what u r reading might not be real.

Deleting People's Posts
The WP:Etiquette Rules forbide you from deleting other people's posts, especially in the Village Pump forum, and especially when you have not contacted them first. Please assume Good Faith and don't just delete people randomly. You are not an administrator and you did not even ask for a consensus on the issue. SanchiTachi 00:25, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Thats not your place to decide if something is in the wrong group. It is watched by administrators who determine such things. It is not your right, as editors are only allowed to delete things only if it is vandalism. You are not assuming good faith. SanchiTachi 00:31, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Actually, you must always assume good faith. Please restore the edit or I will have to recommend you for administrative review. If you would like to refactor the talk page, you could, but you must follow the guidelines. You do not have the right to just delete such topics, especially when it discusses the aspects of NPOV. The Village Pump is designed for open discussion on topics affecting Wikipedia. I believe it was the intent of the author to do such as that. You do not have the right to edit such things out. Please respect that poster and immediately return the content, or I will be forced to revert you for vandalizing the page and then put up your editings for vandalism review also. Please read Avoiding_common_mistakes "Deleting or removing text from any Talk page without archiving it, except in your userspace."SanchiTachi 00:41, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Avoiding_common_mistakes "Deleting or removing text from any Talk page without archiving it, except in your userspace. " Please respect WikiEtiquette. Your edits are vandalism, because you are deleting without having the right to delete. Talk_page_guidelines "Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Others.27_comments "In general, editing others' comments is not allowed. Exceptions are:" Your deletion does not fall under any of the exceptions and is vandalism. "Blanking - Removing all or significant parts of pages, or replacing entire established pages with one's own version without first gaining consensus. Sometimes important verifiable references are deleted with no valid reason(s) given in the summary. However, significant content removals are usually not considered to be vandalism where the reason for the removal of the content is readily apparent by examination of the content itself, or where a non-frivolous explanation for the removal of apparently legitimate content is provided, linked to, or referenced in an edit summary. An example of blanking edits that could be legitimate would be edits that blank all or part of a biography of a living person. Wikipedia is especially concerned about providing accurate and non-biased information on the living, and this may be an effort to remove inaccurate or biased material. Due to the possibility of unexplained good-faith content removal, uw-test1 or uw-delete1, as appropriate, should normally be used as initial warnings for ordinary content removals not involving any circumstances that would merit stronger warnings." Vandalism SanchiTachi 01:01, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

You have a strange inability to follow: Etiquette "Though editing articles is acceptable (and, in fact, encouraged), editing the signed words of another editor on a talk page or other discussion page is generally not acceptable" SanchiTachi 02:11, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Code Lyoko episode summaries
I'm sorry to contact you like this, but I'm not a wikipedia user and I don't know who else to ask. Your name seemed associated with a lot of edits to Code Lyoko and I thought you might know - why have the synopses of the Lyoko episodes been removed? I thought they were great. (I mean the complete recaps, not the short overviews still there.) All the episode pages are now on redirect. As I say, sorry to be a nuisance if this isn't the correct way to contact you, or if you're not the right person. Just thought you might know more than me.203.26.122.12 06:54, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

I'll answer for him. Some weirdo who calls himself TTN deleted all of the summaries - heck the articles associated with them - with no consensus or approval to do so. He claims to follow WP:EPISODE and feels it is his right to do so. Angie Y. 23:11, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, but they can be found on www.answers.com Just go into the search bar, type in the name of the episode (e.g. Maiden Voyage) and select "Maiden Voyage (Code Lyoko episode)" NB. None of the Season four episodes are on there because no one can keep them there for long enough to have Answers take them on. A queenoffairys

Help Please
Im trying to make my own userpage. How do u get the userboxes on the side?Itachi627 22:50, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Suigetsu image
Someguy, the "Oh" is competelu useless and takes up space, and makes the image uselessy large. Please do not continue to make this useless edit or make a statement on Countmaal's talk page (thats me, I just dont feel like logging in) about why the "Oh" is so important. --24.56.197.128 00:15, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Categories for redirects
Good day. It appears that you were one whom was against categorizing redirects, is that correct? Currently, there is still an an going arguement of it between I and another user. I suggested to another person named Piemanmoo that redirects targeted to a list should continue uncategorized, unless they abide by this and this only. Your thoughts? DC&amp;Marvel maniac 16:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I may be wrong, there are other guideline-by-type articles that discuss when fictional-related categories should be utilized for redirected articles. Are there not? DC&amp;Marvel maniac 16:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I suggested on that talk page a survey by power of consensus should get this categories for redirects agitation solved and settled. Agreeable? DC&amp;Marvel maniac 17:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Do you find a poll susceptible? I am rather baffled by the number of discussions on the subject. Are there more opposing, or supporting? DC&amp;Marvel maniac 18:39, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Get facts right
Get it right & stop editing everything that you a narutard who probably started watching naruto after it started on Cartoon network. You cannot really put her becoming a chuunin in abilities, yes it does tell how good she has become to make a chuunin level ninja but it isnt her abilities. So yea, do learn shit & manga> anime & filler should count & have its own section.

Please get laid. Danthoni kuda nee amma gudha nakku, tarvatha nee mardal ki poi nee muudi lo oka veedi ladak petu manu.

Think, why is it called "filler". It is used to help get the manga further ahead so they have mo material to work with. OMG, I want shippudent episode 15-20, do you know where I can find them? lol

Image:Gaara.jpg
Some interesting people leave messages for you on your talk page. :-}

Anyway, do you know what episode this actually comes from? I tried finding it myself, without luck. –Gunslinger47 05:24, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * It's around that number. To be honest, I just sorta guessed at it for the image. Gaara's position limits the possible choices. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 05:28, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Hmm… I usually don't have trouble finding these things. –Gunslinger47 05:32, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Ah, it's 48. Should be at least. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 05:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I thought so too at first, but the background is off. I'll keep looking later. –Gunslinger47 06:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Can redirects have their own categories?
I believe we've spoken once or twice before about something similar to this; Ichigo's proper speed category and things. I had noticed the discussion happening at Wikipedia talk:Redirect and, from what I can make of it, redirected articles are allowed to have categories; which would include the superhuman ones (if they are superhuman-related though). From what I can tell, there is no rule that does not approve — only a few users were not for it — You were one of them, and I think two-three others. Regardless, I don't see anything confusing about it. Should redirected characters, such as the Bleach, Dragon Ball, Naruto and other series characters have all the categories they need and more, or not?  ~ I&#39;m anonymous
 * Would you do the same?  ~ I&#39;m anonymous
 * I see. I'm for it all the way then if there is no opposition, at least from a wealthy contributor as you. Here is what I'll do: I will categorize every character that is/can redirect to a list or article. It would be great if you could help though; if you feel that uneasy about it then I don't mind. I'll start with the Dragon Ball and Bleach character redirects. I'll work my way from there, perhaps I do Naruto (though I don't know much about it save for the dubs) and then the famous comics characters that are redirected. Your thoughts?  ~ I&#39;m anonymous
 * By important ones, I think I know what you're saying: Let's say, the redirected superhero names or pseudynoms or aliases - The Great Saiyaman and Great Saiyaman will have the superhuman categories the Son Gohan article has, but not the child superhero cat., etc. Queen Maxima will have Maxima's categories which relate more to her "queen" title, instead of sharing all of Maxima's cats. That about right?  ~ I&#39;m anonymous
 * Thanks again. Hope we can work together in the near future. {^_^}  ~ I&#39;m anonymous

Gin
Not a big deal so I won't revert you, but yes, he is a commander. --tjstrf talk 23:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Actually I may be assuming that, but I remember Aizen calling Tosen by some big-shot title and Gin presumably holds at least the same authority since Aizen says he's always been his lieutenant. --tjstrf talk 00:03, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

NPOV
A source that is deemed unfit is not appropriate to be sourced in any circumstance.

Your rationale is wrong.

Furthermore, the Sun falls under legitimate publications for qualification under Wikipedia and the wiki page for the Sun even says that. Please stop violating NPOV and put the material back in. Those who are removing the material are being investigated on other pages, I would not want to join them in their crusade to spread misinformation. Thanks. SanchiTachi 01:44, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but saying someone was arrested is not a criticism and clearly does not fall under anything you have claimed. The information you removed was clearly unbiased and presented both groups (hell, it said that more opposition people were arrested than Marxist) as suffering the same condition. Furthermore, " It's a tabloid." does not make it a non-verifiable source, as tabloids in Canada and England present actual, legitimate information. They are called "tabloids" because they also present information on celebrities, which these are not the people that fall under such catagorization. However, your use of the claim that they are "tabloid" is highly suspicious and the same argument that the others have used. SanchiTachi 01:49, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

If you are going to pull out the "remove poorly sourced" rule, then please adhere to it: "Dorothy Jean O'Donnell, "Marxist-Leninists will empower Canadians" [editorial], National Post, 29 May 2004, A23." Editorials do not count as legitimate sources, but are unverifiable opinion pieces. "Citizen's Assembly on Electoral Reform: Presentation Summary, Lillooet Public Hearing, 16 June 2004, accessed 22 November 2006." A presentation does not count as a legitimate verifiable source. http://archives.econ.utah.edu/archives/marxism/2004w42/msg00005.htm An email/personal website is not a legitimate verifiable source.

"Rodden (born 1980) is a political activist in Toronto, Ontario and student in equity studies at the University of Toronto." No information presented to back up this claim. "His candidacy in the 2004 and 2006 federal elections was managed by Shane Ruttle Martinez." No information presented to back up this claim. "He is the former general co-ordinator of Young Left, a revolutionary youth group in Toronto founded by former youth members of the Communist Party of Canada who left the party over organizational and political disagreements." This information is only sourced by an email posting/personal website and thus is not sourced properly. "Rodden himself was never a member of the Communist Party of Canada, and describes his politics as neo-Maoist" No source for this claim. "He is active with Anti-Racist Action in Toronto, the Ontario Coalition Against Poverty, and the Canadian Friends of Soviet People, an organization which supports the re-establishment of the former Soviet Union and publishes the magazine Northstar Compass. " No source for this claim.

If you are removing unsourced/poorly sourced information, please prove it by removing the above. If you refuse to, then you have shown that you are not there to remove unsourced/poorly sourced information, but there to remove only one bit of information to promote a point of view. SanchiTachi 01:55, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The reason why I am so short with you is that I have removed it. Please see the article Shane Ruttle Martinez‎ which is currently in dispute. I removed things that violated BLP based on the BLP pages. The people who keep putting in the POV (which I have cited above) and removed the opposing POV (except when the same source is used to reinforce them) is reinserted. Please remove the Toronto Sun article from the other page if you feel that it is tabloid, as it is not appropriate (especially if there is another link already saying the information). Otherwise, you seem to be putting forth the same POV as the trouble makers are. Please understand the situation and how complicated/delicate it is. SanchiTachi 02:00, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * 1. "Dorothy Jean O'Donnell, " Your response on this point is not correct. Dorothy is not the topic of the article and just wrote an opinion piece that is not verifiable or allowed to talk about biographical information on the topic person (who is not Dorothy). 2. "Not so sure on this one. A fact tag might be appropriate." A fact tag should be put just about everywhere on many of the articles that deal with that topic. 3. "General information need not necessarily be sourced." Claiming registry in political parties needs to be sourced, because it is not "general knowledge" but something based on legal processes. This is clearly part of the verifiability rule, especially with such obscure people. SanchiTachi 02:11, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Sanchi replied to your post so thoroughly. However, I must be overlooking the point where your question was answered. –Gunslinger47 02:26, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Please explain how someone's editorial counts as a source of information for them and doesn't get banned under Autobiographic, especially when its an editorial and not fact. It is not a reference. It would have to fall under "external links." If you cannot understand the difference, please look them up. It is also not a Soapbox so putting a citation to someone's editorial does not belong on Wikipedia. "party registry would presumably be public information (indeed, to run for any office would require public knowledge of it). Easy enough to look up" Then where is the source? Wikipedia is not a place to put unsourced information on Public figures. SanchiTachi 02:57, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but it clearly violates Notability (people) under "The person has been the subject of published1 secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject.2" idendependent criteria. Editorials are not notable sources of information nor are non-independent works when her notability has not been established by enough verifiable sources to even have her mentioned. How can you not understand that "writing" an "editorial" is not notable? SanchiTachi 03:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Don't claim I can't read when the first thing you quote is "it is relevant to the subject's notability;" and one editorial does not make the subject notable. Also, it violates "it does not involve claims about third parties, or about events not directly related to the subject;" The subject lacks all notability. None of the sources about her fall under notability, thus, none of the sources can be allowed as she is not notable. Please read "Just being an elected local official does not guarantee notability." You are obviously not being objective and it is showing that you are only there to express a serious POV and Soapbox, please cease and desist. SanchiTachi 03:25, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Furthermore, your quotation of the self published source is only used when the actual person puts forth the information on themselves, not secondary sources. Please don't claim others can't read when you can't understand what: "Self-published material may never be used in BLPs unless written by the subject him or herself." means. Thanks. SanchiTachi 03:29, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

"The person being written about has to be notable, the sources do not have to pass the same guideline. They just have to be reliable. Citing the location of an editorial is a reliable source, as much as any guide you cite in your Warhammer articles."

No. The Warhammer game is produced in 6 major countries, has existed for 25 years, has millions of players, sold billions of dollars worth of goods, has two magazines, over 60 books, etc etc. The people you cite have nothing even close to that. It is obvious that you have no defense but trying to spam absurdities over and over instead of trying to be reasonable and fixing clearly poorly sourced pages. SanchiTachi 03:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * "Your response shows me that you don't understand how this works," Actually, your response shows that you are ignoring facts and instead putting forth things that are blatantly untrue in an uncivil manner. You are expressing a POV and you are being a hypocrit in deleting things. Please read what Wikipedia is. However, you do not seem capable of understanding the fact that the pages I edit are not about the company, but subjects that are written about by multiple published books. The articles are not on the books, and thus, the books are secondary sources. That is all that needs to be said, because that is how notability works. You can feel free to say whatever you want, but you will not be changing how notability is. One editorial and three links that are not independent of you do not have the ability to establish you as notable for a page. Bye. SanchiTachi 03:56, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

http://www.canlii.org/en/on/oncj/doc/2006/2006oncj54/2006oncj54.html Demonstrates that the article by the Toronto Sun is indeed fact, not fiction. By your own words and claims about one source verifying the Toronto Sun source that it could then be put back in. You should do the right thing and change back what you edited out. Thanks. SanchiTachi 06:41, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

1) You've never read the Toronto Sun article so you can't say if it's fact or fiction. 2) The link above doesn't identify Shane Ruttle Martinez so it doesn't establish anything at all in regards to that article. Frank Pais12:49, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Kyuubi Naruto2.jpg
Are my colors really this screwed up, or was the PNG's hue altered? I just retook the screenshot. –Gunslinger47 03:47, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Image:Kyuubi Naruto2.PNG - orange
 * Image:Kyuubi Naruto2.jpg - red (mine)

three unnamed
Thanks.KrytenKoro 05:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Reply
Who are you refering to when you mention "we", and why do you think you're in charge here? I'm only stating facts. He trained Ichigo with initial release, but then said he could not train Chad with his final release. You're inserting your own POV into that, and I consider you and your friend ganging up on this as little more than bullying on your part.

If there's a middle ground where we can include all facts here, i'm fine with that, but otherwise I will not back down to intimidation. Thereisnowhy 02:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I have, and "several" seems irrelevant since there's only two of you, for all I know, could be the same person. Thereisnowhy 02:08, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

WP:HARASS
WP:HARASS. This is your warning. You are violating that, and your move is vandalism. Any further move and I will report you for Vandalism. This is your warning.

Furthermore, the books are titled Warhammer 40,000, as they are produced as companions to the Warhammer 40,000 rulebooks as expansion stories about characters in the Warhammer 40,000 board game. You did not respect the naming conventions of our Wikiproject, nor did you seek consensus before your move. Graphic Novels is the proper noun used by Warhammer 40,000 to describe those books. This is not an argument about it, this is a warning for you to not vandalize the page and to leave me alone. SanchiTachi 15:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Its not Ownership, because you did not find a consensus nor did you consult the naming conventions of the Warhammer Wiki Project. SanchiTachi 16:28, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


 * In case you hadn't noticed, this user has brought this dispute to AN/I. -FisherQueen (Talk) 17:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Your current move of pictures is unwarranted and goes against the image policy for the group. Images for Armies are only allowed to be displayed if that character is an official member of that army. Stern is not an official member of the Sisters of Battle army, she is an optional character with introduced rules via White Dwarf and does not follow the Codex canon. Furthermore, the Leo article is not about the miniatures, so you cannot place the picture of the miniature there. You can, however, place a picture of the character from the art. Please don't go against the consensus policy for images like you are doing and kindly stop interfering. SanchiTachi 22:38, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

If you believe that, take it up with Image deletion. Otherwise, you will be reported for 3RR violation. SanchiTachi 22:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Just because the page says that does not mean its community consensus. And yes, it does look like a recent change. Proper footnotes always come within the punctuation. I have my masters in Literature and working towards a doctorate in it, and I've done research my whole life. Don't try to pull these games on me. And yes, you are revert warring and that is obvious as to your original intention. SanchiTachi 23:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

No content in Category:Code Lyoko episodes
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Code Lyoko episodes, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Code Lyoko episodes has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Code Lyoko episodes, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Category:Code Lyoko episodes itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

That's because TTN deleted them all. :'( Angie Y. 22:50, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Sigs
STOP EDITING MY SIGS PLEASE. You are escalating matters. -- Cat chi? 21:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

SanchiTachi
If you must edit the same pages as SanchiTachi then I would recommend using the talk page more to try and seek clarification and try and gain consensus. Even if you don't think he will listen to you at least it allows you to maintain the moral high ground. Otherwise it just drags you both into the mud and makes it even more difficult for others to try and hack out solutions. I've started some sections to deal with the current contentious issues on Talk:Black Library gaming (Warhammer 40,000) and hope that helps somewhat. (Emperor 22:08, 27 May 2007 (UTC))


 * Sorry I should have had another word with you when I saw the reverting was getting out of hand and reminded you to stick to the user page and/or report him but it has all played itself out anyway. So just to let you know I have asked for List of Warhammer 40,000 graphic novels to be unblocked (it has now been locked longer than it was live) and we can then move it to the new name. Hopefully, the existence of Black Library gaming (Warhammer 40,000) should help it as it'll help define what shouldn't be on the original entry as it is already covered elsewhere (the miniatures mainly). I have to say while it might be best if you tried to avoid Sanchi in the future (I know I'm panning on doing that) if you (and other editors) hadn't have got involved to try and sort the mess out I'd have given it all up as a bad lot and gone and done something else instead. Fingers crossed, we can now use the current entries as springboards to some good solid entries. The real pity is Sanchi provided a lot of good material they just wouldn't let anyone else edit it. (Emperor 02:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC))


 * Well it is impossible to second guess these things Swatjester‎ might be able to work some magic but he is now butting heads with nearly every admin who has tried to help and that just esclaates the whole mess. This is all partly my fault too for asking a rather innocent question - I'd ask it again if I had my time over too (this time round I might be sensible and hide out for a few days until it all blows over though. It is largely out of hands to try and fix but there are plenty of people on the case so someone should be able to do something. Plenty of work for us to do in the meantime. Once the entry is unlocked anyway. (Emperor 03:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC))

Mind telling me where I recruit them? - I'm not Snachi's greatest fan, but can you please your arguements with him off my Talk Page? I have enough issues with my own arguements with him on mine! Cheers. Darkson - BANG! 14:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

3RR
Please check the WP:AN/3RR section regarding you. Thanks. --Deskana (talk)  00:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ben10 ep03 image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ben10 ep03 image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:57, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ben10 ep04 image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ben10 ep04 image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:57, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ben 10 episode 12.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ben 10 episode 12.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Animo image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Animo image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:06, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Auntvera image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Auntvera image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:06, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Hoverboard image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Hoverboard image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Jonah image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jonah image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Kraab image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Kraab image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Warhammer 40K graphic novel images
Thanks for getting all of those! Well done! --GentlemanGhost 12:32, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Tjstrf
I had a bit of a dispute with the user yesterday. Can you tell Tjstrf that fictional-related categories are allowed on redirects targeted to a section/list of the same name? Chaozu redirecting to List of Earthlings in Dragon Ball is an example. The way this is going, I'll never be able to categorize any of the BLEACH-related redirects as planned; the user continues to disagree on these points and has revealed that all my edits there will be reverted. Lord Sesshomaru
 * I thought you did support me; you only said you weren't gonna assist. Sorry for not announcing that I changed my username and complicating things. Can you undo those "rv" edits now, since the link you showed is not against the use of categorizing redirects by super cats.? Lord Sesshomaru
 * Way I see it, there will be a new guideline made. Understandable: tell me, did you changed your mind after our little discussion conserning this? Lord Sesshomaru
 * What? I don't get what you meant. Lord Sesshomaru
 * Ah, so that's why you "supported" me at first? Am I understanding this correctly? Lord Sesshomaru
 * {sighs}, looks like I'll have to remove superhuman-type categories from any redirects I see along the editiing. You'd do the same, I figure? Lord Sesshomaru
 * As much as I love the Vizard more than the shinigami, I still feel that article should be categorized by superhuman powers. Would it be a waste to create a Vizard in Bleach article just so it can be done or will just Vizard be included in the cats.? Lord Sesshomaru
 * What would you suggest? Lord Sesshomaru

Non-free use disputed for Image:Kazekage.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kazekage.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:49, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

I think...
I was thinking about changing the section title "References" to "Notes and references". and to  for nicer looking refs and the titles of template "bleach character info" all to standard "Bleach character info". I noticed that the Naruto-related articles and Dragon Ball-related articles had those "Notes and references" names instead of just "References". Notes and references are pretty much the same things and look more... informal. Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru
 * As pointless as it may be, I'm 100% okay with changing all the "bleach character info" to "Bleach character info" manually. You could call me crazy, but I just feel a lot better doing it. Can I trust that you won't "rv" me? Lord Sesshomaru
 * Perhaps it is best to tell you that the top where it says "...is a character in..." should it not be fictional character instead like the other articles? Lord Sesshomaru
 * Sorry for replying late. Damn Internet connection failure. I will continue as I was doing. Lord Sesshomaru

Non-free use disputed for Image:Scientologycross.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Scientologycross.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Munich 1 Poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Munich 1 Poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

What the big idea
Black Rhino ranger: Please STOP REDIRECTING Alien forms to Omnitrix, I WANT THE ARTICLE TO BE SHORT. You are going to be blocked for removing and redirecting

Sock puppets?
Upon noting the comments of User:Black Rhino Ranger, User:Snakezilla, and User:Komodo lover, all of whom respond in talk pages in the exact same style, edit the same articles, add (or remove) the same material, have similar usernames relating to animals, and engage in the same types of vandalism. Furthermore, Black Rhino Ranger (whether inadvertenly or through mere stupidity) has pointed to these users here. I would report this, but I would like your opinion on the matter first. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 02:52, 7 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Done. Sephiroth BCR (Converse)  04:06, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

...
Heh, good job keeping those Bleach articles up to date. Speaking of which, been wanting to ask about this edit. Why overlink exactly? Lord Sesshomaru
 * I wish you mentioned that in your summary. It's fine then. Lord Sesshomaru

Re: Linking
Perhaps you responded on the wrong talk page? I honestly have little idea what you're talking about, especially since I haven't beene editing very much the last few days. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 22:22, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Narutovolume4cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Narutovolume4cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

Please note: this tag also applies to the other cover images used in List of Naruto chapters.  Eliminator JR Talk  21:24, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

*sigh*
I have been feeling rather low as of late. Angie Y. 01:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Two problems

 * 1) Could you explain to DC&Marvel maniac about categorizing redirects? I can't really understand the user's explanation, or make out his "arguement"
 * 2) I kinda do not agree with this revert by someone else; I gave a good explanation in the edit summary, the user still reverted it with such a powerful program named WP:POPUPS. Lord Sesshomaru
 * Thanks for helping out. Now, just what about the Bleach (manga) case? Lord Sesshomaru
 * About that, the disambiguation template on Akatsuki (Naruto) was removed long before. I used that, and another time which I can't remember now, as precedence for this. Also, Bleach (manga) differs than articles titled Dragon Ball or Naruto — those cases don't have the subject in parenthesis so they actually need the disam. templates. Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru
 * Thanks, but it seems I can't. He used popups. Lord Sesshomaru
 * Fine. I'll use these conversations as the reasons for reverting him. Lord Sesshomaru
 * Not sure if you're interested, but Gimmtrow commented on a proposed addition regarding the current categorizing confusion. I shall place my vote and reasons why it should remain the way you, tjstrf and I agreed upon. Lord Sesshomaru
 * This is rather off-topic but what is a good site where I can download free manga? I lost the one I had in the quick link on my favorites. Lord Sesshomaru
 * Looks like a fan forum, could you address me to a list of downloadable manga there, or anywhere else on the net for that matter? Lord Sesshomaru
 * I can't find the chapter where Chiyo said that. I noticed you reverted everything. Help? Lord Sesshomaru
 * Ah, I give. I'm sure she said it though when Naruto and the others went to the Sand Country (or village whatever) to rescue Gaara. Maybe I'm just too tired from all that manga reading. Thanks for that website by the way. Though one manga I couldn't find was the entire directory for Yu Yu Hakusho. Could you find that one for me there? I like tried for half an hour. Lord Sesshomaru

Well...
All this attention sure is flattering, what with you following my every move around wikipedia, but some roses and a box of chocolates would be a little more enticing. --Piemanmoo 04:36, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I know! How about I just run each of my edits by you first, just to make sure you're okay with everything?--Piemanmoo 04:43, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, don't be so modest! After all, how could I possibly expect to better wikipedia without you behind my shoulder constantly undoing every single addition of mine? I know that unlike you, I've never been blocked so I don't know exactly how to annoy other editors with a pompous "holier-editor-than-thou" attitude, but hopefuly I'll soon learn it from you.--Piemanmoo 04:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)


 * 1 I'd like to add the Category:Fictional companies to the article Conglom-O_Corporation. Is this okay by you, or is it too trivial?

Tell you what, how about you let me know when that ACTUALY BECOMES POLICY. Right now, there is no rule that specificaly prevents putting categories in redirects, because you're unable to see the fact that "notable" and "non-notable" cannot be determined by one person. Namely, you. So stop acting like you have the God-given right to declare what's unimportant and what isn't. And just because you can get a few admins to back you up, doesn't make you any less of a moron. As long as any policy is open to interpretation, people will see things differently than you will. You really want to help wikipedia? Delete your C drive. That'll solve a lot of problems.--Piemanmoo 05:25, 11 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I hereby givith Someguy0830 the right to declare what's unimportant and what isn't. –God 20:44, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Update
Thought I'd let you know: If you wanted, you may categorize some characters with Category:Characters introduced in, if you know their introductory year that is. If the category by year does not exist, you may create the page with the parent cat. Let me know if you are perplexed at what I am saying. Lord Sesshomaru
 * I'm thinking of having Wind benders and the like redirect to List of fictional characters who can manipulate wind. What do you say? Lord Sesshomaru
 * Suggest what? Oh, and I'm considering adding the Fourth Hokage, Baki, and likely Orochimaru on the list. Ideas? Lord Sesshomaru
 * Like the notable Aang from Avatar — he can create a ball of wind and fly on it for example. Wait, he should be placed in the flight category also; I'll do that. Hmmm... another example would be Jin from YuYu Hakusho — he is able to fly and spin his arm rotationally causing the "tornado fist". There once was an article aerokinesis that explained this. I shall add Baki to the list — any thoughts or comments? Lord Sesshomaru
 * I see. You'd rather I target them to the Airbender article? Lord Sesshomaru
 * "Wind bender" isn't unheard of, but I will admit that show is what comes to my mind when I think of the term. Avatar sure did popularize it. What "others" are you referencing to? Lord Sesshomaru
 * The "See also" sections I usually do, whenever possible. Lord Sesshomaru

Non-free use disputed for Image:Orihime.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Orihime.jpg. However, the image is missing a fair use rationale. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair-use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 19:58, 15 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I gave a quick rationalization, but it could be improved and reduced to 288p, however. –Gunslinger47 20:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale missing for Image:Yumichika.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Yumichika.jpg. However, the image is missing a fair use rationale. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair-use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 22:02, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Oh well
I think all penquins can be trusted even the ones on your userpage.Swirlex 23:48, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale missing for Image:Gillians.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gillians.jpg. However, the image is missing a fair use rationale. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair-use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 00:45, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale missing for Image:Ishida and Orihime in disguise.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Ishida and Orihime in disguise.JPG. However, the image is missing a fair use rationale. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair-use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 00:58, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale missing for Image:Shinjianime.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Shinjianime.jpg. However, the image is missing a fair use rationale. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair-use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 17:26, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale missing for Image:Shinyyumichika.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Shinyyumichika.jpg. However, the image is missing a fair use rationale. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair-use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 17:26, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale missing for Image:Younger kenpachi.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Younger kenpachi.jpg. However, the image is missing a fair use rationale. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair-use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 17:26, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale missing for Image:Hanatarozanpakuto.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hanatarozanpakuto.jpg. However, the image is missing a fair use rationale. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair-use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 17:26, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale missing for Image:Animevizard.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Animevizard.jpg. However, the image is missing a fair use rationale. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair-use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 17:26, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

June 2007
Thank you for making a report at Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators generally only block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. ''User name violations go to WP:UAA, not WP:AIV. Thanks!'' ~  Wi ki her mit  02:07, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Change of image on John Simm article.
It's my understanding you need to provide a fair use rationale for each use of the image you've just added to John Simm. As I'm not wholly sure of the purpose of its use there, I can't do it on your behalf. Mark H Wilkinson 19:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Cool. Sorry if it seemed as if I were jumping on you.  Cheers.  Mark H Wilkinson 19:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Weekly Shonen Jump
What other Bleach characters originally appeared in Weekly Shonen Jump in 2001? I don't want to assume incorrectly, but I'm sure most were introduced a year earlier than when this was released. Lord Sesshomaru
 * Any thoughts? Ideas? Should I ask someone else? Lord Sesshomaru

Thanks
Thanks for finally taking care of the stupid Kataang and Zutara articles. I was trying to appease a few people, going the long way around. Millancad 22:17, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Infobox Ben 10 episode
Template:Infobox Ben 10 episode has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jay32183 23:16, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Rasengan
Listen, I know we had our little rasengan conflict in the past. In the end I decided to just give it up. Then, other people started doing that both english and japanese thing, and then finally changing the title to rasengan. I had nothing to do with these. Sorry about any trouble I might have caused.

Apparantly, you hold a grudge. I was just trying to notify people that it was in the R section and to not put it in the S section which someone did. You didn't have any right to delete it so of course I was upset! Just let it go!

About it being corrected quickly: I was the one who had to correct it.

Grimmjow
Yeah, I agree waiting for the full chapter would have been preferable, but since the spoiler pics proving it's real are out, we can't exactly go reverting sourced information just because it's sketchy. So I figured that getting it named and the section formatted now rather than later would be in our best interests.

Could have been worse though. Some weeks we get accurate spoiler summaries before we get the spoiler pics (Tracheotomy-boy being the 4th Espada, for instance), and end up having to incessantly revert due to lack of proof. --tjstrf talk 00:24, 28 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, my crystal ball says we could figure most of it out by reading Zombie Powder. But then, that may not quite meet Reliable sources, so we're probably better off waiting for the chapter. --tjstrf talk 00:39, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Code Lyoko
I noticed you've made lots of edits to these pages and their related pages. I've added a few tags on some articles because, for someone who has never seen the show and has no knowledge of it, the articles can sometimes makes little sense. I was just wondering if there was something I could do to help since I tagged the articles?

Seraphim Whipp 15:04, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Grimmjow
Its degrading to see how anal some of you are over just a few image changes. First off, the image I provided for the release is an OFFICIAL COLORED PAGE BY THE AUTHOR, not a fan-color like some of you dicks presume. It also shows the release in greater clarity and quality, so get off my back! >.> The image is superior, get over it.

What was wrong with what i put???
Deidara's C4 Garuda, which is a massive sculpture of Deidara himself, seemingly explodes but actually blows apart into tinny microscopic bombs which explodes at a microscopic level causing anything effected to seemingly dissolve. The microscopic bombs kills a variety of plants and animals in the area. Sasuke seems to be dissolving but it turns out to be a illusion. Sasuke appear behind Deidara in his curse seal level 2 form and rips though Deidara's chest with his hand. Sasuke explains he can see the range of the C4 Gaurada attack because the microscopic bombs contain chakara which allows Sasuke to sees the range of C4 Garuda microscopic bombs as a colored cloud as the microscopic bombs disperse. Sasuke tells Deidara that he avoided hitting his vitals so Deidara can tell him the readouts of Itachi. It turns out that this Deidara was a clay clone made by Deidara. Deidara then appears from beneath to attack with another C4 attack.

I just want feed back and I didin't notice i wasn't logged in for the first couple of edits so thats all me. Oh and can you tell me how to add my name to my contributions on dicuss pages, and put user boxes on my profile. If you tell me on my user profile i would appreciate it.

Cast list - VotD
See the article talkpage.--Rambutan (talk) 06:19, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Shinigami (Bleach)
Hi Someguy, can you look at the top of this? I don't know, I've tried to adjust it to appear more encyclopedic but it still looks worded strangely. Or is it just me? Lord Sesshomaru
 * Is Urahara a street merchant? Can't quite figure it out. Lord Sesshomaru
 * You suggest nothing for them? Lord Sesshomaru
 * What category then? Sorry for asking. Lord Sesshomaru
 * Category:Fictional market stallholders or Category:Fictional businesspeople should like good choices. Which for Urahara is what I'm wondering. Lord Sesshomaru

Fair use rationale missing for Image:Ryuken bleach.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Ryuken bleach.PNG. However, the image is missing a fair use rationale. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair-use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 02:03, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale missing for Image:Yammy anime.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Yammy anime.jpg. However, the image is missing a fair use rationale. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair-use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 02:05, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Images
Hey man, I didn't even realize you were putting the images back. I thought something was wrong with my computer. Sorry about the run around. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kunthum (talk • contribs).

Fair use rationale for Image:KimimaroBloodline.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:KimimaroBloodline.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bigr Tex  19:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

WP:UAA
Please don't summarise reports with "self-explanatory", because it is highly likely that it isn't at all obvious to other administrators. There have been numerous pleas against this at AIV and I have doubly highlighted the same instructions that are in the UAA header. If you will go back to UAA and edit your report, that would be appreciated. Thankyou SGGH speak! 10:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Flight in Naruto
Who in Naruto has flight powers? I ask this because I saw it on Flight. I don't recall anyone flying, Sasuke did briefly in the anime (after growing bat-wings) but not enough to place him in that category. I do not recall Choji flying at anytime as a result of food pills. If anyone should be within that cat., then I'd definitely go with Gaara since he utilises sand to lift him. Then again, there was that Star Village filler arc. Comments? Lord Sesshomaru
 * Should I just remove it from there? I don't think Sasuke's flight is notable, he only did it once in the anime with fighting Naruto at that waterfall. Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru
 * I'm sorry, who are you talking about? I haven't seen Sasuke fight Deidara, just Gaara. Lord Sesshomaru
 * You wouldn't mind modifying that sentence regarding Naruto in the flight article, would you? You seem to have more of an idea of who actually flies than me. In other words, I don't know what to write. Lord Sesshomaru

Deidara flies, even doh it is with assistant of a bird he does flies. I think thats it... Masterbeef66 18:34, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Help with Yoruichi disscussion.
Hey, I kinda need your help for the Yoruichi section. We are in the middle of discussing whether she is a black person or dark skinned person(kinda stupid) so can you please help? Just look under the discussion section, is she black? Thanks alot.--Hanaichi 10:39, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:TheNinthDoctor.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:TheNinthDoctor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

The Master (Doctor Who)
Trivia? Oh, yes. Good man. Mark H Wilkinson 22:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

William - Tower Activating Abilities
Why can't that be there? It has been proven, and so what if it is 10 episodes off? I thought Wikipedia was supposed to give people the most information they want? --Ratmaster 02:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

BUMP

Bleach manga chapter
what bleach ch # is it where Grimminjaww kills Lolly and her friend but Oriheme brings them back to life? Sam ov the blue sand 05:48, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm on Editor Review
I'm on Editor Review!. Sam ov the blue sand 03:07, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

WP:NOT
What aspect of "irrelevant discussions are subject to removal" do you find confusing?--Rambutan (talk) 08:06, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Website accessibility is a valid concern for an article which deals in said websites. Honestly, Rambutan, think before you start jumping on discussions. --Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 08:17, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

annoying banners
re: your edit to Yumi Ishiyama — a better way to cope with banners you find annoying would be to address the concern it expresses. That article is completely unsourced, but you could change that! --Jack Merridew 09:05, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Naruto
Hey, sorry about reverting that edit that you made to Naruto, i was not paying attention. Tiptoety 20:15, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Ben 10/ Ditto
Why you keep reverting away the Ditto stub for Ben 10?

Deidara?
I didn't read it in a spoiler, I read the chapter here. I don't know how it is at all unclear that Deidara is dead - he says he's going to die, he says that the explosion will take out everything in the area, even Tobi, and the chapter says it is his "finale". He even dissipated into the little bomb demon.

Is it really that common for manga characters to declare suicide and detonate a nuke on themselves, while dissipating, and then pop up again alive and healthy? I know manga is very fantastical, but all it took to "off" Hidan was to bury his still-living head, and even Orochimaru's "surprising" return was never really ruled out - Sasuke made it clear that Orochimaru wasn't actually dead right from the beginning. To me, Deidara still being alive seems to be as likely as Yondaime surviving the Kyuubi seal and becoming the Akatsuki leader - while an Impure World Ressurection or something similar can obviously still happen, it seems pretty clear to me that Deidara is currently dead.

But, again, I'm probably not as familar with manga tropes as you guys are, so forgive my rambling if the matter truly is so unclear - I just don't understand how more confirmed it can get, since we've already been shown the corpse, and any other characters' words would be just that.KrytenKoro 00:56, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh. That makes sense. But didn't the other clone versions of the Akatsuki members not act like they were actually being killed? And wouldn't a clone not be so difficult for Sasuke to defeat?KrytenKoro

Itachi Image
Why did you change his image? This one looks just terrible and it gives him a very wierd look on his face. Can you please change it back? User:Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 21:40 (Eastern Standard Time), 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for being strict becuase if you weren't I would have had to remove the images thanks and I'm not kidding you just did me a favor. Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 02:10, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Bleach
I can't figure it out, why is the article titled Bleach (manga) and not Bleach (series)? Is it because of its origin from manga? Lord Sesshomaru


 * It's still a wierd title though, don't you think? Lord Sesshomaru


 * The page covers both the anime and manga series, respectively. Perhaps a title like Bleach (media) could suffice? I don't know, then again it seems that there should be a Bleach (manga) and Bleach (anime), like there is a Dragon Ball (manga) and Dragon Ball (anime) & Hellsing (manga) and Hellsing (anime). Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru


 * I guess you're correct on that. Shouldn't Hollows in Bleach have introductory & fiction-related categories given? I presume all hollows possess flight for one. Would a super strength category be included too? Lord Sesshomaru


 * Superb! How does Category:Anime and manga characters who can fly, Category:Anime and manga characters with superhuman strength and Category:Fictional ghosts sound? I'm buzzed at whether Category:2001 introductions or Category:Characters introduced in 2001 be placed below? Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru


 * Well, I'll get those first three in for now. Meanwhile, is the categorization of Shinigami (Bleach) correct? Shouldn't those fiction-related cats. be placed at Shinigami in Bleach instead? Lord Sesshomaru


 * So I've been told. I really disagree with the timestamp and prefer the time visible only on my contributions; I've asked a sysop about my sig before, he said that it wasn't required to link to user pages but it is "just convention". If you like, I'll sign with four tildes on your talkpage from here on (I'll make a note of that right now.) {^_^}. Getting back to the introductions by year cats., you feel it is uneeded to include such on the "Hollows in Bleach" page? They're listed on the "Shinigami (Bleach)" article. Lord Sesshomaru 07:46, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

There's also Category:Fictional warrior races — can that be added? The Arrancar are more like warriors than the hollows, or would you say otherwise? Lord Sesshomaru 07:56, 21 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Can you take a gander at my contributions and see if there's anything I did incorrectly? I'm also considering having Hollows redirect to one of the Bleach hollows articles, but I need your opinion. Lord Sesshomaru 19:20, 21 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Thought so. {^_^} Lord Sesshomaru 21:33, 21 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Don't know if this interests you, but I've discovered Hatnotes. It refers to when there is a dab that isn't needed, like the Bleach and Akatsuki one we've discussed before (There is one dab currently at Bleach that should be removed, which I'll do now). Recently, I've lefted a message for tjstrf regarding a category. I was hoping maybe you could shed some light there. Thanks again, Lord Sesshomaru 05:30, 22 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Something's wrong there. Won't the category be bloated if we were to include every single fictional character on the English Wikipedia? What should be done? Lord Sesshomaru 05:38, 22 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Last I've checked, they were only four, maybe five stray fictional characters there. I'm unsure whether I should add more or remove them. What would you do? Lord Sesshomaru 05:44, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Hughmo and his crappy images
So, I tried to ask him nicely to stop...and I was met with "your pictures are so dark you can't see them.I try to brighten your lame pictures with better ones." So...what can we do, buku? -Sukecchi 01:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Categories
If you recall, tjstrf and I have gotten in an "arguement" about something like this before. From your point of view, is the categorization made by that user correct? To me, I'm always going to consider it flight, seeing as the English dub even [inherently] confirms this. Oh and I've posted a question at the talk page of Byakuya Kuchiki and was hoping someone (maybe you?) could answer it. Lord Sesshomaru 19:35, 24 July 2007


 * It's this entire line that bugs me: "Shortly before her death, Hisana asked Byakuya to find and adopt her biological sister, Rukia, whom she had abandoned as a baby."
 * From what I could interpret; Hisana asked Byakuya to seek and adopt her [Hisana?] sis, Rukia, whom she [Hisana?] had abandoned as a baby.

What is this saying? Lord Sesshomaru 19:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, I think I see it; Byakuya isn't really the brother so Hisana asked Byakuya to accept her as if she were his biological sister? That right? Lord Sesshomaru 20:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for that Byakuya thingy. So, what other characters (from Bleach or anything else) would fit within the categories like Grimmjow's? One I wouldn't say is Yammy, strength yes he has but not the other two. Lord Sesshomaru 20:50, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Uh, I was asking you, sorry. I stopped watching Bleach when it entered the filler arc. Lord Sesshomaru
 * When you say "all", you're referring to arrancar only or is shinigami, vizard, etc. included? Also, I honestly can't think of anyone that is insignificant to those traits. Unless you count the big guys like Yammy and Jidango. Lord Sesshomaru
 * Since I think no discussion is neccessary, would you now add the appropiate flight category to all arrancar with main pages and on the Category:Shinigami in Bleach since you have more knowledge than me? I presume you watched the filler arcs entirely to know more than me. However, I believe Hitsugaya should be the only character that can keep his own flight cat., seeing that his flying ability is a special trademark of his, kinda like Ichigo's trademark being speed. So how about it Someguy? Lord Sesshomaru 21:18, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
For helping against those annoying IPs. I don't look forward to what is going to happen when their blocks expire though.  Sephiroth BCR ( Converse ) 01:20, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

ToonTown Online
Why do you feel it necessary to remove all the helpful and informative details from the ToonTown page, as well as replacing some of it with inaccurate or just completely wrong information? Please stop changing the helpful information that many people contributed, as though you are the ultimate ToonTown expert. Thanks and have a good day. LordOfTheWolves 20:00, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Smile


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Re: 24.20.69.240
Quit being a troll. There is no policy or guideline preventing the use of userboxes and/or the funny symbols on userpages. See User talk:Ryulong, for example. Continue reverting that page and you'll break 3RR. Go edit some articles instead of harassing IP editors. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 02:16, 28 July 2007 (UTC)


 * User talk:Ryulong does not have userboxes on his/her user talk page, userboxes clutter up talk pages. Tcrow777  talk  06:56, 28 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Ryulong has four separate symbols at the top of his talk page, which you're also trolling this IP about. It's not your problem if someone decides to decorate their talk page. You're only harassing this one IP because your recent failure to gain consensus for your IP banning proposal. Go find something of merit to do, because you're just wasting time trying to enforce some non-existent idea that talk pages shouldn't have userboxes. Oh, and quite a few users do it, too. I can bet you wouldn't be so eager if I pointed them out for you. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 07:05, 28 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Point them out! Tcrow777  talk  03:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Naruto's resilience
Why did you revert my edit? Naruto's resilience obviously stems from the Kyuubi. Damage to cells and chakra systems are both enhanced, this is demonstrated continuously throughout the series, both when he is severely hurt, and when he strains his chakra system while learning the Rasengan. I don't quite understand the objection 'nothing said to that effect'. Please undo this reversion. Tyciol 07:08, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 1: I understand if there's preferential terminology, but that would be served by replacing 'Kyuubi' with 'nine-tailed fox' and not just reverting the change. 2: My edit did not say that he relied on Kyuubi's chakra to perform the technique, but that Kyuubi's subtle healing effects on Naruto's body and chakra circulatory systems are what would allow him to recover from the damage that using the technique inflicted on his body. I'm fully aware Naruto is able to power Rasengan using his own Chakra reserves and that he only uses Kyuubi's Chakra for enhancing a special version of it. Tyciol 07:15, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * So, do you at least admit that you were wrong in reason 1? According to Ahimsa you should have just changed Kyuubi to the appropriate word. Now, as for you're saying it is speculation, no, it's not. Not all normal people heal over time from grave injuries. Rock Lee is a good example of this, who required medical intervention. Many injuries surpass a normal human's healing process. It is, for example, unlikely a normal human would have survived having a Chidori through the chest the way Naruto did from Sasuke's attack. Haku, for example, died from it, having no enhanced healing factor. Naruto is of course aware of the technique, and how long it would take to heal (having practised it no doubt) but would naturally take his enhanced healing factor into considerations. It is something he naturally does. He has commented to Shizune in the past about how "no matter how hurt I get a night's rest is all I need". Do you think he's unaware that he heals better and faster than those around him? Tyciol 07:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I would agree that 1 would only apply if 2 didn't, but the thing is, you brought up 1. Why did you bring it up? It was wrong to bring it up as an error, would you agree? Anyway, as for 2 I'm having trouble following what it is exactly that we're arguing about here. You would agree that Naruto would recover from damage inflicted to him by using this technique than from someone else without his Kyuubi healing factor hypothetically using such a technique, right? Does it explain in the manga why having bone breaks and cellular damage would make you unable to use chakra? Those don't even seem chakra-related. Naruto strained his chakra developing Rasengan and recovered from that fast due to Kyuubi. Currently it says "Naruto does not seem to be worried about this due to his abnormal resilience". This would refer to the abnormal resilience of his body. We know that the abnormal resilience his body has is because of the Kyuubi. So is what you are arguing that my modification implies he knows the resilience is due to the Kyuubi and you're saying that he's not aware it is the Kyuubi that lets him heal faster and survive great injury?
 * Even if Naruto is overconfident, he would still be overconfident in the capabilities of his Kyuubi healing factor. Compensation for the backlash is not a factor. Resilience has nothing to do with compensating for the backlash. If he's compensating for the backlash, then that would mean he is refining the technique, not relying on resiliance. The obvious reason he believes he is resilient is because he is more resilient than other humans due to his Kyuubi-enhanced wolverine-like healing factor. Tyciol 07:35, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

July 2007
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Ben 10. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. ''This would not apply if it were simple and obvious, vandalism. However, the additions were not. ''  i  (said)  (did) 07:23, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

Kind regards, Anthøny  13:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

42 (Doctor Who)
Regarding the image used for the above article: did you have a preference as to which one to use? It's not clear from the article history whether you did? (I'll be watching your talk page, in case you want to reply before being unblocked.) --Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 16:42, 28 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The other image was a redlink. I just restored the working one. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 20:05, 28 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes, I know that it was a red link. It has been restored (presumably, it was incorrectly deleted). Beyond that, do you have an opinion. --Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 08:41, 29 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The ship seems more indicative of the situation. Flamy-eye Doc just doesn't illustrate it as well. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 08:54, 29 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I've forwarded your opinion. --Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 09:42, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Ben 10
Good Evening (BST time); it has come to my attention that you are currently in a dispute with at the article Ben 10. Please note that constantly reverting other users is not how disputes on Wikipedia are resolved; instead, we proceed through a list of mediums that each aim to find a compromise. Please see Resolving disputes for more information, and this page for the list of methods of Dispute Resolution.

However, please note that it is essential that you discuss with the other party the dispute; you could do this at your talk page, here; at 66.92.74.246's talk page; or at the article talk page.

Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.

Kind regards, Anthøny  17:33, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Electronic voice phenomenon rewrite project
Hey, I noticed you were a frequent contributor to the Electronic voice phenomenon article and I thought I'd let you know that I'm proposing a rewrite project for the article. I thought you might be interested in contributing to it. Currently the article seems to have numerous dispute problems including POV issues and I thought I could get it to at least a Good Article. You can see my proposal on it's talk page here Talk:Electronic voice phenomenon. There are a few questions I'd like you to answer first though. If you have any questions about it you can leave me a message. Thanks.  Wikidudeman  (talk) 00:53, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Chad (Bleach)
I'm lost, are we supposed to be utilising Chad or Yasutora Sado for all of Bleach-related articles? Frankly, I've seen Sado more in use than the other and that's what I've been adhering to. Now the article completely uses Chad, what to do? Lord Sesshomaru
 * After that, can you take a look at Masashi Kishimoto? I've added more references but it looks strangely worded. It seems there is too much cruft apparently but I'll need your help. Lord Sesshomaru
 * Thanks for cleaning up that page, though isn't manga artist supposed to be linked in the top paragraph instead of the bottom? Ah, regarding the Chad problem you may comment here if you'd like, let's reach a conclusion to this "Chad vs. Sado" Pt. II talk. Lord Sesshomaru

Smile


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Code Lyoko DS pic
Could you please find a more updated picture for this? The picture is not the current game cover, and whenever I upload a picture it is usually deleted. Thanks. Codelyoko193 Talk 14:32, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

If I took a picture of my own game case and uploaded it, would that be legal to use? Thanks. Codelyoko193 Talk 13:33, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

I'd really like to put a new picture, as would User:Naruto134, because the one up now is not the current one. Codelyoko193 Talk 13:36, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

List of Bleach chapters
Could you tell me the reason why the changes I made on this was not constructive. Hartebeest Talk  3:51 PM, August 3
 * Oh, it's OK, you didn't revert it. Hartebeest  Talk  3:58 PM, August 3


 * Oh, you reverted it, and said there isn't summaries elsewhere for Naruto Volumes, why don't you take a look at List of Naruto episodes, just because there is no synopsis for Naruto characters, doesn't mean there is no summaries elsewhere. Can't rev you any longer, or I'll be blocked. Hartebeest Talk  3:51 PM, August 3


 * Fine, but what about the later volumes(after Vol.25) then? Hartebeest Talk  3:51 PM, August 3

Toonami Article
Listen, this article is being worked on by SEVERAL PEOPLE. I do not appericate you stepping in and starting to work on an article you haven't seen till today by removing things arbitrarily.

There is a lot of people working on this. Your comments of "Ridiculous" are derogatory.

Now PLEASE stop messing up the article. If you wish to help DISCUSS IT. There is PLENTY that can be done on the article. If you continue to change things by and claimed it as "ridiculous" I will be forced to request you be blocked from the article.

It's had enough abuse already today from vandals. Please don't contribute to it! Knighthammer 06:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC)


 * No, YOU stepped in and ruined the article. The only reason I didn't follow up was because it was a test format to see if people in the community that worked on THAT page would like it. On THIS page, it is a resource that many people are working on and many people USE. If you don't like the format, thats YOUR progrative but the bottom line is on this article you ARE in the minority. You're only option is to discuss it in the talk back page.


 * You may consider to choose your words a little more carefully because acting in such a derogatory manner earns you very little respect. Knighthammer 06:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Enough. Knighthammer, you are clearly in the wrong here; you have serious WP:OWN issues with these articles, and are not following accepted policy. It does not matter how many people you have behind you - Wikipedia is not a democracy. You display little to no knowledge of Wikipedia's fair use policy or style guidelines. Stop, or perhaps a report at WP:ANI would be appropiate.  Sephiroth BCR ( Converse ) 07:00, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Re:Knighthammer
Sorry about that. I was in a bit of a rush, and is the first Twinkle option to come up. Perhaps ?  Sephiroth BCR ( Converse ) 07:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)


 * [Sigh] He's removing the speedy deletion templates from the images. Perhaps a WP:AIV report is in order?  Sephiroth BCR ( Converse ) 07:15, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm...
Well, since I apparently blocked you, I thought I'd give you some balloons to say I'm sorry. =) -- Gogo Dodo 07:02, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Template:Editor even
A template you created, Template:Editor even, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the   tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. --MZMcBride 17:44, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Your attitude in regards to my recent edits
Your attitude in regards to my edits to the Odd Della Robbia and Aelita (Code Lyoko) articles is selfish and unacceptable. You've always been been this selfish since the first time you came to know I was editing here. Whenever I type something that I personally think is relevant, you delete it anyway. Please stop. Thank you. Angie Y. 10:35, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Changes to Digital Command Control
You have made two edits to Digital Command Control recently which seem to have been performed from a perspective of Wikipedia style rather than any interest in Model Railroads.

The first involved removing a list of links to DCC manufacturers which I think should not have been done as such information is very hard to come by - I myself added one of the links some time ago. I propose restoring this information especially as these are clearly marked as external links.

Your most recent change involved removing a link in the text to an external site. I agree with you here but what you have not spotted is that many of the Wiki links all point to an external Wiki with no provenance which I believe is very wrong. I have just raised this as an issue in Village pump (policy) but I'm not happy with the one response I got so far and am considering what to do next. I would welcome your opinion. St1got 18:23, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Pichu
There seems to be some debate close to edit warring over whether or not Pichu should still have categories as a redirect. I'm going to back out of this, but just thought you should have the heads up. -WarthogDemon 03:12, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Link Formats
Hi. I saw that you had removed some links from several pages on my watchlist. I've seen links to those websites on numerous other comics pages, so I reverted your changes back. What is the proper way to format these links to make them more like those in other articles? BOZ 05:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Exequias
How is he important? All he had done was finish off some Privarons, you call that important? At least tell me the reason, OK? 205.250.3.9 15:48, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, I'm Hartebeest by the way, I just forgot to login Hartebeest 15:49, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Category:EastEnders characters
Appears that even all of the redirected characters of that soap are in that cat. If you can comment at this section in order for use to solve this problem that'd be great. Lord Sesshomaru 16:00, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Hey
Been awhile since we've talked, well, I did send a message above. Mainly why I came here is that I wanted to ask why you claimed this was pointless. I've done the same to several other articles and was never told that it was not needed. Comments? Concerns? Lord Sesshomaru 01:38, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll keep that in mind then, thanks for explaining Someguy. You're still welcome to comment at WP:CAT-RD (there's been a new section updated there BTW). Lord Sesshomaru 01:48, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Redirects on Smash articles
Hey there. I've noticed you been removed a redirect article in the Category Super Smash Bros. Fighters, citing WP:CAT-RD. I looked over that and didn't see anything specifically mentioning it, and in fact that seems rather to support the position of keeping the categories on the articles. However, I invite you to open up a discussion on it at Category talk:Super Smash Bros. fighters. Thanks! The T 03:45, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


 * In response to your comment on my talk page: Then I'd like you to offer to explain how they aren't related. The category should list all the playable Smash characters, not merely the ones who aren't mentioned in a subarticle. I'm not the first one to add the category or revert it. If you have some specific reason as to how they don't fit, list it. It's pointless to have a silly edit war. The T 04:25, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Too many articles in Bleach.
Hey you know the long long long discussion about too many articles in Bleach? I've been doing a test page for that here and I think its time we start merging the articles. What about you?-- Hana ichi  13:21, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Felcis
Perhaps you can explain better to about undoing every single good edit from helpful users. In case the user reverts again, can you undo it as a vandalism edit? I've reached my 3rr limit. Lord Sesshomaru 19:47, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Another question, is ninjutsu, genjutsu and taijutsu supposed to be italicized? For example, it is on Itachi's page yet not on Rock Lee. Lord Sesshomaru 20:33, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * And of italisizing those words? Lord Sesshomaru 18:36, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * "Excelsior!" Foreign like shinigami I see. Shall get right on it, oh and if you happen to come across any along the way I'd greatly appreciate your help on italisizing these terms. Regards, Lord Sesshomaru 23:53, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Archive
Stop posting comments on archives. Use the main page. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 10:13, 17 August 2007 (UTC) Sorry, I just thought that's seperate into pages. And that "comment" was for you. Dylan Damien 11:00, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Ben 10 Season 3 DVD
Were did you get your information on the release date of the third season? Kc007 12:00, 17 August 2007 (EST)

Okay thanks. I have been looking it uop for the past several days and can find no information on it. User:Kc007:Kc007 7:46. 17 August 2007 (EST)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hanatarozanpakuto.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Hanatarozanpakuto.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:43, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ibazanpakuto.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ibazanpakuto.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:52, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Codelyoko193 (again)
On this, I removed a redlinked "Code lyoko 2". I didn't think that this was a real game, and barely anything showed up on Google. Do you know anything about the game? Codelyoko193 Talk 21:50, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Codelyoko193 Talk 22:03, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Kagura
If you do not cease vandalizing her page, I WILL report you. This is your final warning. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Special:Contributions/ (talk)

Stco23
I thought you were the uploader for the Crash DVD, but I found out that you weren't. I'm Sorry for that one message I put one your talk page.--Stco23 16:14, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hanatarozanpakuto.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Hanatarozanpakuto.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Help
Can you help me with a new site I am making about Code Lyoko? (site is codelyoko.us) Can you email me at darkusrattus05@yahoo.com to reject or know more and if you would like remove this message after you read it and/or respond in my talk page about this so I know it is you who responds. I am offering an admin possition. Thanks. --Ratmaster 17:44, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for the quick response anyway, if you want the position anytime just tell me.--Ratmaster 18:19, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

3RR
Hello, someguy0830. I appreciate your edits on Wikipedia, but I do disagree with the one you reverted. I do feel it in the best interests of civility to note that you have reached the limits of the 3RR. Thank you for your time. Never Cry Wolf 03:00, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * You are free to feel as you wish- the fact is that I do edit frequently, I just do it at the places where I have constant internet access, which is the local library here. I log in with this when I need to do something more official, like talking to you. :) Regardless, this is a content dispute, which means that you need to avoid violation of the 3RR whenever you can. Have a great night. Never Cry Wolf 03:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Like I already told you- I log in with this account only when I absolutely have to. I can either do it with my ex-husbands's computer (he has great internet access), or I can use my old dialup computer, which I hate doing. I don't log into the library computer because other people use wikipedia on it, and god forbid that someone start vandalizing from an IP I used and I end up blocked for it. Now I dare say that I have entertained your incivility long enough- I have been polite from the start, whereas YOU have done nothing but insult me and weasel your way out of your 3RR violation. I will not discuss this with you further- I disagree with you on this content issue, and that is that. God, you're JUST like my ex. Now you will either address this content dispute or kindly leave me alone. Never Cry Wolf 04:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked for 96 hours
For a 3 revert rule violation on Jim Moralés. 3rd offense. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:37, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

about 3RR
user:Vonones who is in a pure anti-turkic personality, attack the "turkic history" pages of wikipedia, (see the Huns page), he is an armenian user and hate all the turkish people(he always edit with no written source). he uses 3RR rule throug to his nationalist and racist ideals. how can i stop him? thanks.--hakozen 03:02, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Take it to WP:ANI, if it's obvious. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 03:21, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Raingenin.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Raingenin.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:36, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Editor Review
My editor review sucks how do i get more reviews? Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 01:59, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of Akatsuki members
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of Akatsuki members, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/List of Akatsuki members. Thank you. <font face="Kristen ITC"><font color="Blue">Jreferee  (Talk) 15:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Lord Holy Ono
Please do not revert users on their own talk pages. They are allowed to remove whatever they want from their talk page (see Userpage). Thank you, ugen64 21:58, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Uchiwa Sasuke
Hello, wikipedian

The deletion of the article: List of akatsuki members change everything. We can't merge it in an article which doesn't exist anymore...

Another proposition will be to merge it in the akatsuki article but it will be totally stupid. Itachi is one of the main character of naruto, his description cannot be done in 10 lines.....

The discussion has only been about the deletion of the list since 28 August 2007.

"I suggest that we wait to furhter discuss the merger discussion until after the Akatsuki one is finished, as if that is deleted than there would be no proper place to put him. Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 20:59, 28 August 2007 (UTC)"

Let's wait and see what will happen now. In these conditions isn't wise anymore to talk about merging this article or not. Everyone is getting angry about the deletion of : list of akatsuki members and there is no concrete discussion anymore :(

We'll speak about that again when the discussion about the akatsuki members' description will be closed.

What do you think ? For me once again it's totally irrelevant to continue this discussion for now :(

Mrpouetpouet 00:43, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edit warring.
I noticed you got blocked for a 3RR violation, it's your 3rd one. I would just like to give you some advice: Next time you get into an edit war, stop reverting and go to the other user's talk page and try to negotiate a deal. That's what I always do. Hope that helps, <font color="Blue"> Cheers,JetLover  03:38, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

RauJ16 3RR warning
I am well aware of this rule, and if you check the talk page, I did start a discussion which eventually led to this edit war. Myself and the one I was warring with, are currently discussing the appropriate edits to make to the article, and I also noticed what someone said on your talk page, to bring the discussion to their talk page if they do not use the articles, looks like this was more of a help than a courtesy. And thank you for this warning, I appreciate it. RauJ16 21:36, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

List of Akatsuki members
The List of Akatsuki members AfD you participated in has been brought to deletion review here. Please take a look if you're interested. — <span style="font:bold 11px Arial;display:inline;border:#000066 1px solid;background-color:#ECF1F7;padding:0 4px 0 4px;">xDanielx T/C 19:57, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Guardian.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Guardian.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

-_-
2 iS a thRet, not 1 or 2 i see no prOblem with 1 and 3 wAs truE--Mhart54com 01:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

About Race Against Time discussion
I noticed what you said regarding Hyuuga-sama's edit. Perhaps this user wasn't treating the talk page properly, but that doesn't change the fact that reverting edits on talk pages is rude. I've noticed that you've already gotten people on your case for reverting talk page edits. Rather than getting rid of these edits, perhaps you should remind people that talk pages aren't forums. As for Hyuuga-sama, I'd recommend looking through his/her contributions. It seems that (for the most part) he/she is trying to improve Wikipedia. Whatever happened to assuming good faith? The world&#39;s hungriest paperweight 16:54, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * One doesn't need to assume good faith when there's evidence to the contrary. The user has been told repeatedly not to use talk pages as a forum and persists anyway. I do realize it seems rude, but I've been dealing with him/her for a while now. The user pops up every now and then to start a chat thread or something like that, then disappears for days only to return and continue. Just clearing it saves time, instead of eliciting personal attacks when someone tries to explain it. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 17:42, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * You seem to have overlooked one of the links I presented. Hyuuga-sama does seem to be trying to improve Wikipedia. True, his/her actions on talk pages may not always be the most appropriate, but you seem to have reverted a number of other edits made by this user, and it appears that most are attempts to improve Wikipedia. Just because a person doesn't always behave properly doesn't mean that they can't.
 * On top of that, it doesn't change the fact that you have reverted a good number of other people's talk page comments. Remember this?
 * P.S. I can understand putting your response on my talk page, but we are talking about you here, so let's keep this conversation here please. Besides, I find it a bit disorienting when only half of a conversation is going on on a person's talk page. The world&#39;s hungriest paperweight 19:13, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Fine, I'll make an exception and reply here. While the edits were made in good faith, fair-use images on actors is against policy, hence why I removed them. Sure, he tries, but his attitude in regards to images in particular has gotten him blocked before. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 19:19, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I guess I can't argue with that part. However, this brings up the question of why you got rid of Graham Phillips' picture on his page but not on Ben 10: Race Against Time. But I suppose that's a different subject entirely. I suppose this whole discussion is just something we're going to disagree on, so we probably shouldn't drag it out too far. However, I've noticed that a number of your edits within the past hour (like here, here, and the "TBA" here) are reverts over relatively minor details. I noticed you yourself have gotten blocked for breaking the three-revert rule. Considering this, things this small and unimportant really aren't worth reverting. Even if you think it might be better off left alone, don't forget that everyone has equal rights to these pages, so please try to hold back on the reverts (for your own sake as much as anyone's). My biggest concern here is that you seem a little, for lack of better terms, revert happy. The world&#39;s hungriest paperweight 19:36, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Hell, I'll admit to that much. As for the image, a movie page is expected to use fair-use. Public domain is unfeasable. Not so with living people. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 19:40, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Zaera zanpakuto.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Zaera zanpakuto.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:34, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Transport.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Transport.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:41, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Guardian.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Guardian.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:47, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Diane thurston.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Diane thurston.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:51, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Animevizard.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Animevizard.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Naruto's Parentage
Please do not revert the edits and rewrite Minato's article to make it look like it's been clearly stated (as in "Minato is Naruto's father") that Minato and Naruto are indeed related. Read Naruto's (Character) talk page for more information. Until such time it's been made clear beyond doubt they are indeed related, it's just heavily implied (no matter how heavily). FallenAngelII 17:35, 9 September 2007 (GMT+1)


 * You refuse to see reason, despite it being practically agreed upon that as long as it's just heavily implied, the Wikipedia article should reflect that. I don't care if you think heavily implying is underscoring the fact and as such, it's a true fact. Put you silly obsession with their blood ties aside and look at it objectively. It has not been proven, in any way, not even through simple dialogue that they are in fact father and son. Whenever it's been talked about, strange words and sentences have been used to make it sound ambiguous. As such, it's been heavily implied and not been established as a fact. Stating otherwise would be LYING. The day they say "They are father and son!", you'll have your victory dance. Until then, no. --FallenAngelII 11:07, 10 September 2007 (GMT+1)

3RR
Sorry to disturb you with this, but just as a formality:

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of Konoha ninja. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors.

We'd all hate to see you get blocked again. Cheers,  You Can ' t Review Me!!! 19:11, 9 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Was it spread over several days? I've got to pay more attention to these things.
 * Eh he... sorry...  You Can ' t Review Me!!! 21:59, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Shinyyumichika.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Shinyyumichika.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bfahp gameplay1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bfahp gameplay1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:12, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Clone image.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Clone image.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Leave... my...edits...ALONE!!
Leave my edits alone, unless you want to help me! I thought I told you to keep the Japanese VAs IN! People will want to know who they are! Revert them now! You have already been placed under 3RR violation. Do NOT do this again! Angie Y. 01:57, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Responded. <font color="Blue"> Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake)  00:56, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

He's doing it again, Jet! Angie Y. 00:25, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

List of Naruto: Shippūden episodes
The List of Naruto: Shippūden episodes article received heavy editing today by new/unregistered users, which I noticed at WikiRage.com. The article may benefit from a good review. According to Wikipedia Page History Statistics, you are one of the top contributors to that page. If you have the time, would you please read over the article and make any necessary changes. Thanks. -- <font face="Kristen ITC"><font color="Blue">Jreferee  (Talk) 05:38, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Uchiha Madara
Hey, what do you suggest as a better picture that complies with fair use of Madara Uchiha? I believe that his character is actually notable enough to have a picture of him. Drop a line on my talk page and I'll see what I can do.  σмgн gσмg  22:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

?
You removed the pictures I put, because they were otherwise a white square. Is it just my computer, or what? Thank you, Codelyoko193  Talk 23:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Yeah, that's what I thought too. Thanks, Codelyoko193  Talk 01:53, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

It is accurate.
It is accurate. I saw the trailer. I saw the helmeted alien say himself. "My name is Eon." THAT'S WHAT HE SAID!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyuuga-sama (talk • contribs) 02:25, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

I saw the second trailer. You probably missed it but I SWEAR I SAW THE SECOND TRAILER!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyuuga-sama (talk • contribs) 02:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

It was probably the first premiere. whatever. I saw it and you can't take that experience away from me. you'll find out when you see it yourself. Whatever. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyuuga-sama (talk • contribs) 02:34, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Naruto Episode 105
The episode aired today (September 14), on the Canadian channel YTV at 5:30 PM EST. Phazon Chaos 03:44, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, but it says english airdate, so if it's only the CN airdates, wouldn't that mean that they're inaccurate? Phazon Chaos 03:50, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Codelyoko193 (again)
What do you think about User:Angie Y.? First, there was that whole thing with User:TTN and the redirects. Now, she has managed to get a page edit protected for until next month. What do you think, do we have another fiasco on our hands? Thanks, Codelyoko193  Talk 13:48, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

The Madara Uchiha Pic
Thanks for removing that horrible pic of Madara Uchiha!Halstrom 23:30, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Arsenal666
S/he has been posting a bunch of pics again. Including the one Madara that you deleted! And s/he has included his/her own fan art of two of Hokages! Halstrom 19:34, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Random Smile!
<div style="float:center; border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px; vertical-align: middle;" class="plainlinks">

WarthogDemon has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. - Warthog Demon  19:57, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Images
I posted images of Kevin in his pyronite and tetramand form. Why you are removing them? Benvicktor10

You are REALLY pissing me off!
You are seriously making me mad! I'm TRYING to make the CL template better! Angie Y. 18:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

"persistent, are we"--yes I am.
May I ask why you keep deleting my posts--particularly the one on the Temari section? I do translations for subs of the show, and I moderate some forums. The "hot topic" part (has, in fact, been commented on by the creator) is not a matter of opinion, but fact. And the creator's "hint" was posted in an article (although this was when part II first started coming out so it might not still be online). I'm not exactly clear why you seem to continually deem my posts unworthy of remaining on the article. I still include that they deny dating, and just added some more information. I plan to continue to be persistent, but I'm just curious about why you keep doing this.

Boomshakalaka--LOL~:) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.235.33 (talk) 23:01, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

EDIT: Saying that there is fan speculation isn't fan speculation. And any couple would support the hint (by "further" I was referring to the confirmation of Asuma and Kurenai [sp?]). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.235.33 (talk) 23:20, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

OT: are you on NF--b/c there is somebody with almost the exact same username on there? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.235.33 (talk) 23:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

You idiot! i said it wasn't confirmed
Look, considering that Chiyo comments on the Sharingan's ability to cast genjutsu through eye contact I think that merits a mentioning in the freakin' Sharingan article. Even Deidara mentioned the Sharingan's genjutsu ability. And, I never said it was 100% true. But every time we've seen a Sharingan user use their hypnotic eye, there's always genjutsu involved. Kakashi made Zabuza see himself right before he attacked him in their first encounter. Itachi placed Naruto under a genjutsu before he controlled one of his arms so Naruto couldn't stop his chakra flow. Sasuke controls Maanda with genjutsu to escape Deidara's explosion, which either Maanda or Suigetsu mentions. Itachi immediately places genjutsu on Deidara before their fight, and it seems like he was controlling him. Both Sasuke and Itachi ensnare Orochimaru with a paralyzing genjutsu, and you CAN paralyze someone hypnotically although it might not be as effective. But Sasuke definitely uses hypnotic suggestion to turn Orochimaru's dimension against him. You couldn't do that with an illusion. Also, if the Sharingan could control someone without placing genjutsu, then why wouldn't they? Kakashi doesn't even LIKE genjutsu because they're just illusions but he used it on Zabuza anyway. And, if you look even more closely at the encounter with the Itachi body-double, Kakashi takes extra measures not to avoid Itachi's hypnotic eye, but the genjutsu the accompanies it. My theory is way more likely than yours. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.23.107.200 (talk) 23:22, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
hypnotism is in NO way associated with illusions but thank u for including the ability to create illusions in the Sharingan article. Also, sorry about my angry comment earlier.76.23.107.200 23:50, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Holiday Commitee
Would you be interested in joining the Holiday Commitee? Thanks, Codelyoko193  Talk 13:02, 21 September 2007 (UTC)