User talk:The Siktath

Welcome!
Howdy,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; you seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! If you need help on how to title new articles, see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting pages, visit the manual of style. For general questions, go to Help or the FAQ; if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page. ---

Additional tips
Here are some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
 * For Wikipedia policies and guidelines, see The Five Pillars of Wikipedia and What Wikipedia is not.
 * Find everything in the Directory.
 * If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, the Sandbox is for you.
 * If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random article button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.
 * If you have edits from before creating an account, see the page on changing attribution for edits.
 * You can also upload images. Make sure you use the correct copyright tags when you do.
 * Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

Be bold
Be bold in updating pages! You can find instantaneous help any time simply by typing anywhere on your own user or user talk page.

You can find me at my user page or talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and we'll see ya 'round.

Jo e  I  05:10, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

I appreciate the additions that you are making to Wikipedia, but many of your additions are unreferenced and could be seen as mere advertisements for a company. Do you work for Omnivision Technologies? You made some additions to intubation that were unreferenced and slightly confusing, so I removed them. With proper inline references, they could be a good addition.Patrick Berry 19:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

I do not work for OmniVision, but I do find their products interesting. As you can see, I've added sources to that page.

I haven't been able to determine the standard by which changes are allowed to stand. I've been to many pages lacking sources filled with questionable additions. Nevertheless, I only casually edit when I think I can add value.

Why did you delete the section I added about the dangers of intubation? The data came from the ASA's journal and shows some pretty alarming statistics about intubation. I think someone might consider that valuable, and I didn't know that the ASA had been considered a questionable source. You don't have to worry about me adding it back. Like I said, I only casually edit.

Tracheoscopic Ventilation Tube
A template has been added to the article Tracheoscopic Ventilation Tube, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author.

Speedy deletion of TrueFocus
A tag has been placed on TrueFocus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dicklyon 06:46, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Spam in Compustat
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Compustat, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Compustat is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Compustat, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 03:00, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Owner earnings
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Owner earnings, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Owner earnings. Docg 01:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Owner earnings
I have nominated Owner earnings, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Owner earnings. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Docg 12:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nominations of Assets and Liabilities of Commercial Banks in the United States


A tag has been placed on Assets and Liabilities of Commercial Banks in the United States, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Assets and Liabilities of Commercial Banks in the United States and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Pop Music Buff  talk 20:48, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Assets and Liabilities of Commercial Banks in the United States, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Pop Music Buff  talk 20:48, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Compustat


The article Compustat has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Subsidiary of S&P. Not notable in it's own right.  Orphan. No reliable sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Decstop (talk) 18:54, 16 October 2011 (UTC)