User talk:The Skywatcher and me

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, The Skywatcher and me! Thank you for your contributions. I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Marek. 69  talk  01:04, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Note
Hi The Skywatcher and me, a number of edits from this account have raised red flags. Your first edit to a sock-puppet account's talk page is probably the most obvious. Further edits such as this conform to a pattern of ppl abusing multiple accounts to harass another editor. Your focus on British and Irish articles, and accounts engaged in disputes therein displays a knowledge of wikipedia not congruent with a new account. Please also be aware that edits such as this are subject to Arbitration committee rulings & sanctions (especially TROUBLES & TROUBLES) - tendentious or otherwise pointy edits will result in sanctions being imposed on accounts-- Cailil  talk 22:36, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Watcha Cailil! No need for you to bother yourself. All this talk of red flags; bit over the top really. I'm not a new user, as I make clear on my page, and Sven turns out not to be sock, and what's this focus you're on about? I don't see it. Cheers. The Skywatcher and me (talk) 17:08, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Re your message on my talk page. Thank you. You were one of a couple of individuals to respond in a friendly, reasonable manner. I am sorry but all the idiocy and crap put me right off wanting to do anything for this website, which was probably the intention. A strange welcoming party. All the same, I am back and did what you suggested. Sven the Big Viking (talk) 13:40, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Blocked for Wikihounding in violation of WP:TROUBLES
This account has been blocked for an indefinite duration for breaching an Arbitration ruling. Said breach occured when edits wikihounding user:HighKing were made on the following articles: 2011 Commonwealth Youth Games medal table, UK_Alfa_Romeo_Owners_Club, and Swallowtail butterfly (which this account has never edited before).

The sepcific parts of the 'The Troubles' RfAr findings that I am referring two are principles 4 & 5 ('Harassment' and 'Tit for Tat')

This account was warned about such behaviour above (specifically about hounding and reverting User:HighKing in a manner that conforms to serial sock- and meat- puppets that are being encouraged and/or co-ordinated from off-site). But they have ignored that warning. Since then they have gone on to make remarks that violate WP:HARASS, WP:AGF, and WP:CIVIL about the same user here, here and here (where they attempt to defend another account who has been blocked under the same ruling for engaging in the same behaviour).

Considering the level of violation here, the number of red flags raised, and the account's attitude to Arbitration Enforcement in this area (as exemplified in their defence of wikihounding of User:HighKing by other accounts) it is clear that account is either a single purpose account here to "police" HighKing's edits (violating WP:HARASS and WP:BATTLE), or is involved in serial sock- and/or meat- puppetry to harass User:HighKing (co-ordinated from offiste).

Wikipedia is not a battleground. The use of it for such behaviour will be prevented. There are a series of Arbitration findings, community probations as well as ordinary site policies that mark out such behaviour as utterly inappropriate. For the above reasons and the seriousness of these violations you have been blocked indefinitely. As this is an Arbitration enforcement block you may appeal it directly to the Arbitration committee by e-mail to arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org -- Cailil  talk 21:12, 21 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Administrators will not review a block that arose from violation of an ArbCom ruling. You must appeal to the ArbCom via email. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:46, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * But that is exactly my point. This is not a violation of an Arbcom ruling. If you think it is, could you please explain how. Thanks. The Skywatcher and me (talk) 17:53, 22 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Skywatcher - any edit related to Irish nationalism related to Britain and/or British nationalism related to Ireland is covered by WP:TROUBLES. Following & reverting another editor, becuase of their percieved Irish nationalist or British nationalist edits, to other unrelated articles is also covered by that RFAR (principles 4 & 5). You had explicit warning of this above. You've now been pointed to the appropriate process for AE unblock request (by emailing arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org ) by myself, 2 other sysops, and by Jéské Couriano. Further abuse of the unblock template will result in this account being prevented from editing this page, as per site policy on unblock requests-- Cailil  talk 14:13, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, it should be noted that this account is blocked, not banned, and that that block is "indefinite" rather than "permanent" (ie of undecided or uncertain length).-- Cailil  talk 14:49, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Unblock
As per your BASC appeal, you have been unblocked. Keep in mind that this is not a guard against future blocks, and is contingent on avoiding the behavior that led to the original blocks. Good luck. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 18:19, 2 November 2011 (UTC)