User talk:The Solutrean

Welcome!
Testing Talk Page.

July 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Category:Far-right political parties in the United States. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —  Richard  BB  22:29, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Your edit summaries
Edit summaries are meant to describe the edit itself. Using them to comment on others or for any form of debate in the way you have used them is considered to be disruptive editing (for which you have already been warned) and you are almost certainly going to be blocked if this continues. Dougweller (talk) 07:21, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Reconsidered and am blocking until you understand the issues
I'm placing an indefinite block on you - one which can be lifted at any time if you show that you understand why your actions are disruptive and agree to stop. I've done this after looking at your userpage and your edits - you say " it's necessary to add commentary exposing the extreme bias within wikipedia." and " I am only drawing attention to an issue which Wikipedia fails to addres". That's a misuse of edit summaries. Even article talk pages aren't appropriate places for general complaints (and certainly not for comments on other articles). If you have specific changes you want to see in an article and can support those with sources that meet our criteria or because you think the changes are supported by our guidelines and policies, then you can discuss them on article talk pages. If you want our guidelines or policies changed, you can propose such changes on the talk pages associated with those articles and guidelines. But you need to stop your current use of edit summaries, so I am blocking you until, as I wrote above, you agree to change your behaviour. That means you can be unblocked even today. Dougweller (talk) 10:33, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 10:34, 10 July 2013 (UTC)