User talk:The Sr Guy

Your edits
Although I believe you good intentions, there is a pattern in your edits of bias, whether intentional or not. You have made a number of unfounded edits that present Catholicism in a more favorable light than other religious points of view, or that misrepresent Catholicism. Before you question this, look carefully at where your edits have been reverted and the reasons they were reverted. And note that I am Catholic, but I try not allow my own religious perspectives to influence my edits. It's fine for you to have personal biases, but that should not be reflected in your edits on Wikipedia, where neutral point of view is a cornerstone of editing. I ask that you either agree to a mentor to review your edits (perhaps someone who is a part of WP:WikiProject Catholicism) that are related to religion, or that you get opinions on the talk page of any article in which you make edits related to religion. I think that will serve two purposes. It will improve the neutrality of your edits and thus make you a better editor. And it will save the rest of us the time that we must devote to correcting your problem edits. Please consider this. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 00:49, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * ok (The Sr Guy (talk) 00:53, 27 February 2020 (UTC))


 * It seems he's agreen to mentoring. This change today struck me. I don't know about good faith when I see something like this. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 18:39, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Episcopal church USA
Good afternoon. If you have a moment to look at the discussion here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Episcopal_Church_(United_States)#IP_revert_of_sourced_material_(comments_by_the_Presiding_Bishop)_as_%22editorializing%22   and were able to contribute, that would be useful. In particular if you felt that there was a reasonable edit to be made it would be better if another editor and me were to make it. With all good wishes, Springnuts (talk) 13:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Neil Gorsuch, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 16:21, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Read WP:BLPCAT. BLPs are held to a higher standard for sourcing, especially for religious identification. Sundayclose (talk) 16:21, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Category:Reigning Protestant monarchs has been nominated for discussion
Category:Reigning Protestant monarchs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 17:47, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Causing accessibility problems with charts
Cant we get you to read over WP:Sandwich....best not make WP:PROSE non readable just to add the same info in a chart. Pls dont add charts that sandwich text just to duplicate data already there.-- Moxy 🍁 01:35, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Recent odd change to Puerto Rico article New Spain ---> Mexico and Puerto Rican article ---> "nominally"
Hi

I'm not going to spend time checking your edits but this one looks particularly troublesome. Why would you change New Spain to New Spain|Mexico? when New Spain (I copied the text from the Puerto Rico article: says ::: "It included what is now Mexico plus the current U.S. states of California, Nevada, Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, Arizona, Texas, Oregon, Washington, Florida and parts of Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Kansas, Oklahoma, Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana; as well as the southwestern part of British Columbia of present-day Canada; plus the Captaincy General of Guatemala (which included the current countries of Guatemala, the Mexican state of Chiapas, Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua); the Captaincy General of Cuba (current Cuba, Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico and Trinidad and Tobago); and the Captaincy General of the Philippines (including the Philippines, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, the Caroline Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, Palau, the Marshall Islands and the short lived Spanish Formosa in modern-day northern Taiwan, as well as during a century the island of Tidore and the briefly"   Here is the DIFF

Please share your rational with me and the world here. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 18:34, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I change to Mexico because the capital of New Spain was Mexico City, and there is not much difference between the Territory of the Viceroyalty of New Spain and the Territory of the First Mexican Empire (apart from the Caribbean and Philippines), in the Spanish Empire article the Viceroyalty of New Spain is simply referred as “Mexico“.(The Sr Guy (talk) 18:49, 19 March 2020 (UTC))


 * Really? So do you think that changing the label displayed to "Mexico" will help our readers understand the area?

and what about this: "nominally..." and quoting just half of a sentence, which changes the entire meaning of the sentence, especially when you're quoting a 15 year old resource.

Quoting part of a statement from a book from 2005 that said. "Most Puerto Ricans are nominally Roman Catholics, although Protestant denominations and Pentecostal sects have been growing on the island since about 1900.(Fitzpatrick, 1976)." is not honest. If 15 years ago that was the statement made in the book why would you only add "Most Puerto Ricans are nominally Roman Catholics." ? That was 15 years ago... so if you were to include the complete quote.. then we'd probably be able to surmise that the first part of the quote no longer holds water. ---The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 19:12, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for fixing the stats on religion on the Puerto Ricans article.--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 20:48, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of America's Most Famous Catholic


A tag has been placed on America's Most Famous Catholic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"not mentioned on page, not an official title/could have many targets"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 23:45, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

America's Most Famous Catholic
What possessed you to try to create a redirect like this? As if you alone can decide who should be designated the most famous Catholic on Wikipedia. I thought you had made a bit of progress with your problem edits, but obviously I was wrong. I must now insist that you get a mentor before making another edit. Go to WP:Adopt-a-user, read about the process, and request a mentor. At this point any experienced editor will work. Later you can change to someone else if you feel the need. The only other option is that you wait for opinions on talk pages before you make an edit. I don't know exactly what the problem is in your thinking, but competence is required to edit Wikipedia. I prefer to think of this as a competence problem rather than intentional disruptive editing. It doesn't mean you are incompetent in general, but in terms of the skills and knowledge you need to make appropriate edits, you lack something. This is especially true in light of the fact that you're been editing for more than two months. It can come improve with mentoring and experience. It's best if you seek voluntary mentoring. But if necessary it can be made a condition for you to continue editing. Please seek a mentor immediately. If you make additional edits without doing so, I will have no choice but to raise these problems at WP:ANI. Sundayclose (talk) 00:35, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * ok, sorry. the reason why I put this redirect is because that's how he describes himself(The Sr Guy (talk) 00:39, 21 March 2020 (UTC))
 * That's the kind of thinking that creates problems on Wikipedia. A mentor would have immediately told you it's a bad idea. Get a mentor before making more edits. Sundayclose (talk) 00:46, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Do read: Competence is required. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 01:35, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * how do i get a mentor?(The Sr Guy (talk) 13:46, 24 March 2020 (UTC))
 * Try asking specific questions at the Village Pump or Teahouse here --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 14:38, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Also introduce yourself to and join this group WikiProject_Catholicism -- The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 15:43, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Read and Talk combined on your talk page
I'm not sure why your talk page is set up so that I can't edit a specific heading but I have to edit the entire page. Can you fix that because it makes updating one section of your page rather awkward. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 14:54, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't know how to fix this either. (The Sr Guy (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2020 (UTC))
 * OkayKenji fixed it for you. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 21:52, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Piauí, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Piau%C3%AD check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Piau%C3%AD?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Unexplained removal
Hello, I'm Zebuready. I noticed that you recently removed content from Religion in Brazil without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on Zebuready (talk) 19:45, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Catholic Church in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gallup ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Catholic_Church_in_the_United_States check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Catholic_Church_in_the_United_States?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Requesting expansion and update edit support
Hi,

Season's greetings

I am looking for proactive expansion and update support/input help the following (So far neglected but important topic) articles, if possible. Even if you feel focus area bit different still contribution of few line may help bring in some different perspective and also help Wikipedia goal of neutrality. If you can't spare time but if you know any good references you can note those on talk pages.


 * Islamic advice literature

Your user ID was selected randomly (for sake of neutrality) from related other articles changes list related to Literature.

Thanks, warm regards and greetings

Bookku (talk) 10:33, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Religion in Japan
again and again, it's your own analysis not what the sources said. the safest bet here is only using what the sources showed. I've done some research about the report of Agency for Culture Affairs you strongly recommend. your own analysis is wrong. "others" in the report means "other religions" not "other religions or none". (https://www.christiantoday.co.jp/articles/27577/20200107/2019-religious-year-book.htm) so you should know explaining data by yourself is easy to make mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.137.28.220 (talk) 03:38, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * ok, I agree(The Sr Guy (talk) 14:40, 13 June 2020 (UTC))

Disambiguation link notification for June 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Demographics of Florida, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Demographics_of_Florida check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Demographics_of_Florida?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Warning
Hi. I recall having already dealt the "pie chart thing" with you before? It is not a deja vu, right? I think it was made clear you need to stick to how the source presents the survey (according to how the questions were asked). And if there is any reason to choose one survey over another, discuss it in the talk page. You have established a preference for "Macrobarómetro de octubre de 2019" (because of its larger sample size, which seems actually rather sensible), so please don't distort the results of that survey with how you would like them to be. Cheers.--Asqueladd (talk) 21:51, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Religion in Kenya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Don't forget to use 'em. Thanks! BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 04:42, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Irreligion in China into State religion. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 11:14, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ivory Coast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Central Business District
Your attention is called to the addition of this display to the article on the Central Business District, Los Angeles (1880s-1890s). Do you have any feelings, for or against? Discussion should take place on that article's Talk page. Thanks. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 18:01, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pernambuco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page No religion.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Religion in Japan
Hello and greetings. You are more acquainted with wikipedian procedure than myself. Do you have any idea how to protect the page/warn the IP? He keeps shoving that damn pie chart, which implies that 61% of the Japanese are irreligious (while what they meant, of course, is that they are 無宗教). AddMore-III (talk) 20:04, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree with you that his edits don't make any sense, but since i'm not an administrator i can't do much, try to file a report on the Administrator Noticeboard or on Administrator intervention against vandalism. This is so that an administrator can proceed to block the user or to give the user a last warning. If you really want to block the page try Requests for page protection. (The Sr Guy (talk) 22:59, 15 October 2020 (UTC))

Disambiguation link notification for November 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Demographics of Uruguay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brazil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello
Can you please email me kevinpg123@icloud.com i have a business proposal for you. Kluvep (talk) 06:27, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Stoicism sidebar
Template:Stoicism sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. &#32;- car chasm (talk) 08:42, 11 February 2023 (UTC)