User talk:The Technodrome's Toilet

Redirecting Tiger Woods
Many people have their wikipedia pages titled based on the the name they are known by. Ranging from athletes (Chick Evans) to musicians (Snoop Dogg), the name of the article is the name they are most famously known by. I think it is silly to redirect these pages, as it will affect their place in Google searches. Wikipedia is often #1, but with redirects, it will not work as well, and will lead to confusion. Supertigerman 22:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

The Price of Pleasure verification
Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. Do you have any sources to verify the information in this article? The 2 websites listed don't work. Without some sort of outside verification, the article will probably be deleted. Joyous! | Talk 02:14, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't have any yet. Wait a while and if nothing materialises then discuss deletion.  The Technodrome&#39;s Toilet 02:16, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Jungle Fury Episodes
While I'm happy that you'd like to contribute to this section of Wikipedia, the episode listing you posted couldn't possibly be added in a way that would pass Wikipedia's verifiability rules. No secondary sources (such as tvguide.com) would list those episodes until one or two weeks before they actually air, meaning there wouldn't be any citations we could add with which to prove those are the real names of those episodes. Further along that line, Disney has under affect for its schedule releases a six week rule: people with press access to said TV schedules are under NDA to not reveal those episode titles until six weeks prior to airtime at the earliest. That means that the absolute earliest we could find out the title of the first JF episode, assuming it aired on the first Monday in February 2008, would be the day before Christmas. The final nail in the coffin is that Disney normally releases those schedules at around the seven or eight week mark, meaning it's still about two months too early for even people who have inside sources and don't care about breaking legal contracts to actually know what the first episodes of JF would be named. And that's assuming they even have names at the moment; JF only just started filming in the last two or three weeks, so that kind of thing likely wouldn't be finalized anyways.

So, basically, if somebody on a website or forum told you that those are the names of the first several episodes of JF, there's a 99% chance they were lying to you. If you came up with those titles yourself, that's an amusing exercise for fans, but not something that belongs on Wikipedia, as the site is an encyclopedic one that lists factual information. Arrowned 06:35, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * It's confidential before the six week mark. After which, it's not confidential, but is still hard to prove the existence of until secondary sources, such as tvguide.com or the like, collaborate it.  This is exactly why the episodes posted after #30 at OO's article (which is currently as far as tvguide.com lists) are hidden where normal article surfers can't see them: because they haven't been confirmed by secondary sources we can site yet.  But the 30 episodes that are listed on the OO article are both on tvguide.com, Disney's own Jetix website schedule (which is cited in the OO article as proof in the links), and a legion of other television schedule sites. Arrowned 06:54, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Do not add an episode list to the Jungle Fury page, or make another page for the Jungle Fury episode list, unless the show has aired, and all of the episodes you mention have aired or have been listed at the TV Guide or official Jetix websites. If you continue, you will be blocked for disruption.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 06:49, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Okay, do not add any unverified information concerning what could be the plot, what enemies there are, etc. It's all either someone's rumor fodder or something from your own imagination. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia as such, you will be blocked.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 06:52, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Block
Based on edits you made to Zordon in early April, it is quite obvious you are a reincarnation of either Eddie Segoura or CBDrunkerson. Right now I'm leaning towards the former. Should a check on this account prove to be neither, you will be unblocked.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 07:01, 17 October 2007 (UTC)


 * You have now admitted that this is not the first account you have had at Wikipedia; your username sounds like a role account; the assertions will be checked as soon as a checkuser can get to them. Declined.
 * I have just been finding more and more questionable edits, such as changing the names of episodes for other shows, making up episode titles for other shows, referencing games when you shouldn't, moving pages unilaterally, changing the basic plotline for movies, making up movies, etc. If you are not either of the people who I think you are, you should still be blocked indefinitely for jeopardizing the project.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 07:24, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * You can't seem to get your story straight. In your check request, you state that that the Zordon edit were today.  They were in April.  After running into you, I told Arrowned I would stop editing PR pages because you act as if you own the project and will block anyone who does something that disagrees with you.  The fact you said I should be blocked indefinitely shows that AGF is not part of your vocabulary since you tend to take extreme measures judging from your list of blocks.  And when I said I just started editing after a long time off, I meant that this account was dormant prior to a few nights ago.  The Technodrome&#39;s Toilet 07:33, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The evidence is way too damning, and you have been performing edits against policy outside of the topic of Power Rangers. You are not going to get unblocked so easily.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 07:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't see anything wrong with my edits (outside the hoax articles, which couldv'e been deleted). Most of them don't seem to offend anyone.  The problem is you tend to act unilaterally.  Most admins would give a one day block in response to what I did.  You tend to block infinite without warning, which shows your habit of assuming bad faith.  The Technodrome&#39;s Toilet 09:49, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * As for the Zordon edits. I prodded the article since many TV characters are not notable enough to have their own articles.  When the tag was removed, I left it alone and made no forther attempts to delete.  I'll admit the hoax article, but again there is nothing wrong with an occasional good laugh.  In any case I'll wait the result of RL's query. The Technodrome&#39;s Toilet 02:41, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

I for one am seriously annoyed by hoax articles, and I would seriously consider blocking an editor who persisted in creating them after warning even if his record was otherwise spotless. While I have a sense of humour, wikipedia does not. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 18:59, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I've stated above I would refrain from creating them. I didn't think that people would be that much offended by them.  And really the hoax articles constitute only a small fraction (at most 5) of my edits aside from the fact not everyone trusts the blocking user.   The Technodrome&#39;s Toilet 20:23, 20 October 2007 (UTC)