User talk:The Thing That Should Not Be/Archive 2

Rainbow coloured dogs
If you don't mind too much could you have a look at University of Calgary ? I seem to have got into a revert war with UniversityDetectives over his Dog section. I thought I would drag a 3rd person in, you :) for another opinion. Thanks. Frosted Δ 14  03:25, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

So... I'm starting to like your code on your userpage more and more
wanna help me code mine? :)  - Jameson L. Tai   talk  ♦  guestbook  ♦  contribs  21:09, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Ask J.delanoy about it. He's the person that did my userpage.  Until It Sleeps   02:30, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Userpage
I was just about to edit your userpage for you and got that rather clever message ;-). Anyway just thought I would point out a missed letter in one of your sentances. "My most active month so far has been January, with over 6,000 edits. Nice userpage coding. Uksam88 (talk) 19:24, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅Fixed — Jake  Wartenberg  21:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh... thanks for telling me that Uksam88, and for doing that for me JW.  Until It Sleeps   02:30, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Bobby Sands...
...was a terrorist scumbag. I don't think this is currently reflected in his article. I'm going to add a POV tag. 91.108.218.211 (talk) 20:47, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Point taken, but the edit itself was not vandalism. 91.108.218.211 (talk) 20:50, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Right, so I won't include that in my editing of the article, but the FACT still remains that Mr Sands was (hahaha "was" as in "no longer is") a terrorist scumbag. 91.108.218.211 (talk) 20:55, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Come come now
I supported your RfA, so you could cut a brutha a break. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.128.159.114 (talk) 02:25, 15 March 2009 (UTC)


 * And... exactly how could you have supported it? Barring that you have made no edits to it, I must also note that IP editors can't vote in RfA's...  Until It Sleeps   02:30, 15 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Jesus Christ man, do you suppose I don't have accounts here?


 * And, exactly what would those accounts be anyways?  Until It Sleeps   02:45, 15 March 2009 (UTC)


 * What a question. Surely you jest.  Now please, don't attempt to adjust your television set.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by LemuelJohnston (talk • contribs) 03:57, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Wilerch
appears to have been attempting to remove a serious BLP violation (added by User:.152.24.176). I think you may owe him an apology. His blanking of the page previously was wrong to start with, but the latest attempts are just removing a category that is highly inappropriate - Pederast. Mfield (talk) 03:16, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I believe Wizardman may have already mentioned this to you, but this kind of situation is clearly spelled out at Biographies_of_living_persons. Daniel (talk) 04:04, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Message
How is it, wanna explain what you're doing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.116.30.34 (talk) 03:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Advertising article
Hey what is your problem? You can't just go around erasing other peoples edits. Please stop or I will find a mod and tell them about this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.39.35.178 (talk) 23:22, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Unexplained revert
Why? Thanks. - 58.8.13.68 (talk) 12:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Cheers. 58.8.13.68 (talk) 16:16, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Apology
As I look out over the things having been done, I have very many sorrows in my iron heart. I have Latin teacher dying of lechtrechonodes and she is in the belief that nobody cares anymore about Sallust and I am trying to show her other wise. I see that I have erred! I will be a good person from ever more and shall not trouble anybody.

However I have friends with same concerns but different sufferings who may have learned differently. I hope they will be good, but two things are not the same: learning by hearsay and by experience. 128.197.244.207 (talk) 13:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry about that (Djhhashkari edit)
My friend got on the computer, but I caught him editing and stopped him before he could edit any other articles. - Eugene Krabs (talk) 14:53, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Huggle
Hi there, Please see the download page for the new release of huggle. It should work and should be the only version to work. Thank X  clamation point  and if you have any questions please get to me on my talk page as I will not be checking back here. -- ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 21:25, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

message
is that not what their called —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.125.7.11 (talk) 04:26, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

message2
hello, I am Godfrey Walawage and I am new to wiki and I am expanding my contribution little by little on wiki cos it helps many people around the world. Even I make use of it in most of the time. You have recently made changers to the page i am interested to write, page St Peter's College, Colombo its still under construction but I am unable to expand some of the topics to another relevant page

Eg:- I want to have the "Battles of the Saints" and "Honours Recipients" to another page named "Battles of the Saints" and to "List of St.Peter's College alumni (Old Peterites)" I checked on the wiki and there is no such exsisting.

I am referring these pages are similar like this

1) Is a event (cricket) that is very popular in Sri lanka and it is known as "Battles of the Saints" As a reference (a similar event) Royal–Thomian http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal-Thomian

and I am sure this page will be shared with St. Joseph's College, Colombo http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Joseph%27s_College,_Colombo

2) this is something similar to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Royal_College_alumni_(Old_Royalists) List of Royal College alumni and I want it on to another page cos the list is very big and I prefer having that separate to the article of the school.

Please help me by creating me those two pages.

Godfrey both of these schools are the very popular and it

Reply
Thank you for the guide.

Happy 's Day!
For a userbox you can put on your userpage, please see User:Dylan620/Today/Happy Me Day!. Sorry that it's late, I would have given it to you a good 18 hours earlier if I wasn't busy off-wiki. --Dylan (chat, work, ping, sign) 18:13, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

spork
I recently realized that there are about five people using User:Plastikspork/monobook.js/script.js, or at least five people who have added it to monobook.js. So, I would like to try to get some feedback to help make it more useful for your needs.

1 Have you noticed it performing any unsafe transformations?

2 Are there too many spork buttons?

3 Which spork buttons to you use?

4 Are there any spork buttons which you never use?

5 Are there any transformations which you wish to have in a script like this one, but are currently missing?

6 Are there any spork buttons which should be split or merged?

7 Any other comments or suggestions?

Thanks for your feedback! Plastikspork (talk) 19:12, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Utah meetup
Please see the discussion for a new possibility. Hope to see you there! ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar

 * Sorry for that, lol but my browser got crazy for a while :-(, anyways you are welcome, good job ;-) Maen. K. A. (talk) 16:42, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Blanked Pages
Hello, just a quick message to say that when a page is blanked, please always check the page history to ensure that it is not the creator blanking the page, if it is then the page can simply have placed on it. A edit you made reverted a blanking of a page by the page creator, thus please remove your  warning. Also I know this is difficult when using huggle or twinkle, as I use huggle myself, but it is a serious issue, as it means users are left with warnings they don't deserve, anyway, good work in the recent changes and thanks! SpitfireTally-ho! 12:48, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeh, sadly if the page has been edited by at least two other editors then you don't get the message, no harm done. In reality I only posted this message to give me a chance catch up with you on the RCP, but shhh, its a secret, all the best SpitfireTally-ho! 12:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks :). Thats really appreciated, my first real barnstar (I've recieved a few fakes, over the years). Thanks a lot, that really improved my day! SpitfireTally-ho! 12:59, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Is this Good faith edit??
Hi do we concider this edit good faith and leave it as is??! Maen. K. A. (talk) 16:21, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I see, thats why i asked you in particular, as you did the last revision before the edit, anyways thank you for your fast response :-)Maen. K. A. (talk) 16:32, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Academy of tucson article
Sorry about doing the speedy from an IP address for the Academy of tucson article. I forgot to log in. Thanks! JogCon (talk) 17:10, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Heh, thanks for stopping by and telling me. Until It Sleeps  21:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with an edit to the page Vii. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. (76.29.83.176 (talk) 22:39, 23 April 2009 (UTC))

Please be more careful
--NE2 07:33, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 5 May 2009 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding  to the review page will prevent further automated actions. End of line. DustyBot (talk) 10:00, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello myself!
Well, hello to me too! You warned 153.107.97.157 again for vandalism, here. I'm about to add another warning for this one--would you care to send this on to someone with a big stick and blocking privileges? thanks, Drmies (talk) 19:13, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Dwarf planet
Should be "vertically challenged" 90.196.214.174 (talk) 16:12, 6 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Um, the article you edited is talking about a planet, not a person. It is impossible for a planet to be "vertically challenged", because the vast majority of planets are spherical... A planet cannot be "tall" or "short" in any fashion. Until It Sleeps  16:15, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Pan cake article
I think these are the same people is there anyway to link them or get the attention of an admin faster? Ottawa4ever (talk) 18:11, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

message
Hey, I don't know what the hell is going on. I don't know how it's possible but using satellite internet I must somehow share IPs with some random asshole. I haven't touched any pages and would like to let that fact be known kthnx.

Dynamic IP
This is a dynamic ip address used for aliant telesystems. Therefore, any message left on this talk page will not be delivered to the correct recepient. 142.177.60.106 (talk) 17:00, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

spoiler
Why don't you do something constructive about it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.19.136.213 (talk) 23:01, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Ill look into placing a trivia tag on the article Mr sleeps. Unless you want to do anything with the article yourself :) Ottawa4ever (talk) 23:06, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Shameless thankspam


FlyingToaster Barnstar Hello Until It Sleeps! Thank you so much for your support in my  recent RfA , which passed with a tally of 126 / 32 / 5. I am truly humbled by the trust you placed in me, and will endeavor to live up to that trust.  Flying Toaster 

WE177
On what grounds did you revert my recent edit? Blatant removal of edits is vandalism. For over 10 years I was the MOD Stores Officer for the WE177 weapon system. What I stated was factual (and in any case not even vaguely controversial). Most of the rest of the article does consist of rubbish (but the OSA prevents me from editing in corrections). Hell, they can't ebven get the name of the weapon right. 86.141.192.195 (talk) 11:51, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppet
The most recent vandal to U2 is clearly by a sockpuppeteer. Is it possible to shut this user down at the source. Maybe, file a checkuser and block the IP for 24 hours or something? And semi-protect U2.-- The Legendary   Sky Attacker  04:35, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm already in contact with a CU on IRC. J.delanoy gabs adds  04:36, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Cheerleaders (2008 film)
Your recent reversion edit was uncalled-for, unresearched, and impulsive litigious absurdity. I corrected a link that pointed to the wrong person, which claimed that a fictional character from the Rocky series of movies starred in a pornographic film, rather than, oh, a porn actor did. If you spent any time checking knowledge instead of handing down ridiculous judgments from whatever bitwise throne you've built for yourself, you might even save yourself some time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.238.7.16 (talk) 07:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I must say, this user sure does know how to deliver a punch. Hes a keeper. Also, about the huggle... not with those claws you aint.  Benders  Game  22:46, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Seems your having a good day :)
I was going to give you an antivandilism star but seems someone beat me to it! Thanks again. Ottawa4ever (talk) 17:42, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello
I noticed that you edited the Juggalo page a few days ago, reverting vandalism. Would you please take a look at the Juggalo talk page. I am having a sourcing conflict with another editor and don't know how to get help. I am very much willing to discuss the issue and find a proper compromise but I don't think the other editor is. If you're too busy to help could you point me towards the appropriate person. Thank you. 72.66.109.24 (talk) 03:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Your use of huggle
Did you actually review the source before you deleted my entry or do you just not like the message? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.135.145.137 (talk) 13:45, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

New message
Hi, I don't know how else to reply to people undoing edits (I'm a noob), but i clicked 'talk' and it sent me here so here I am! When I visited wikipedia today a box alerted me to new messages, upon clicking of which I was informed that my edits to the collingwood football club page (logged to my IP address, 124.181.105.25) were classed as vandalism and had been removed. The only problem is that I haven't edited any pages on wikipedia, let alone that one, and neither has anyone else who uses this computer or the internet connection in this house. I don't know how this happened, or how i stop it from happening again, but i don't want to be prevented from editing wikipedia in the future because of this, or for people to think I am a moron who vandalises pages and can't even spell correctly when I do. As you were the person who reverted both of these edits (thankyou for doing that by the way), I thought you might know what is going on here? I'm guessing I have the same problem as the person at the top of this page, although they are much more succinct... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.181.105.25 (talk) 08:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello there. Based on the time that the edits were made, February 16th, it seems that your IP address might be a dynamic IP address, and that somebody else had used it before it was assigned to your connection. Also, our blocking policy makes it so that IP addresses cannot be permanently blocked, due to the fact that alot of internet providers use dynamic IP's. This prevents new users that may have just gotten an IP, that a vandal had previously used, from being inadvertantely blocked from editing. Since you only have 2 warnings on your talk, and since it has been so long, you are fine. If you would like to continue here, your just fine with editing without logging in, or you are just as welcome to create an account here, so as to avoid possible irrelevant warnings and messages. Until It Sleeps  20:00, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Your user page
How did you do that with your user page so vandels will have problems! I must know! This is ingenious Irunongames  •  play  10:22, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism/harassment
An anonymous editor has repeatedly engaged in edit warring, and even after having the content of the article edited to satisfy his own perspective, he is still continuing to attack and harass other editors and vandalize talk pages by removing content, claiming that he is removing personal attacks when the statements made are clearly true. He does not understand Wikipedia's policies, removes every warning made against his actions, and refuses to accept the fact that his behavior is inappropriate. Clear examples of this editor's vandalism can be found here and here. This editor does not understand why his behavior is inappropriate, and refuses to listen to reason, and insists that any opposition against his will is harassment or vandalism. He also engages in trolling on talk pages, removing accurate descriptions of his vandalism and telling opposing editors that they "make zero sense". (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 19:29, 5 June 2009 (UTC))

thank you for keeping my userpage clean
Thanks for reverting that user's attack on my user page :) - Kingpin13 (talk) 20:26, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Reversion on Brer Soul
Hi - can you please explain why you removed the reference tag for the album information? I took the catalog # as presented on the album exactly. Your revision text doesn't really make sense in that context.. Thanks... Luminifer (talk) 02:05, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Because the edit was in all caps? The least the guy could have done is turn off his caps-lock key, then I wouldn't have even looked at it in the first place. Until It Sleeps  02:20, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't understand. Who is "the guy"? I copied it verbatim from the record, which had its catalog number and description in all caps. Why is should all caps be incorrect for a catalog description? Luminifer (talk) 06:14, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * We usually do not have articles with writing in all caps. Using correct capitalization would work just fine for this article.  Until It Sleeps 06:26, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It was a reference - a catalog number. There is no reason to (a) remove perfectly valid info simply because it is in all caps (in case it was added by someone not paying attention), especially when (b) it is supposed to be in all caps. If I reinstate it are you going to remove it again? Luminifer (talk) 14:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You can reinstate it, but it would be preferred that it be in a normal capitalization, instead of all caps. Until It Sleeps  17:13, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Why didn't you just un-cap it then? Wouldn't that have been more constructive than removing valid information just because you don't like its format? (though keep in mind that on the record it is in all caps) Luminifer (talk) 21:10, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey, you reverted something I didn't do
Failure on your part, enjoy your life :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.67.149.182 (talk) 02:38, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
...for this. Also, thanks for any other efforts you've made on my behalf that I may have missed. See ya 'round  Tide  rolls  03:13, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

My talk page
Feeling a little indecisive? :-D - Running On  Brains (talk page) 18:12, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, misclicked there... Until It Sleeps  18:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

NO!
was not an unconstrutive edit, I was just saying that they are not suitable article for wikipedia, it is some kid and his band with a myspage page, NOT what this is about... pleas do not leave me message like that caus I'm trying to do good! Burning heap of smokey ash (talk) 12:49, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey!
Thanks for the revert on my userpage. Cheers,  Otis  Jimmy  One  00:26, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Don't understand what was wrong with the UGK discography edit, the group got great fame from being featured on Big Pimpin', I was very surprised that it wasn't among the songs listed on their guest appearances. To this day that is perhaps what they are most famous for, even though they have released a ton of excellent material.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.39.0.165 (talk) 03:38, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Black (hieroglyphic 'km')
I know and trust the IP who is currently editing this. Dougweller (talk) 13:39, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Your revert of my edit
Why did you revert that edit of mine here? 75.119.216.163 (talk) 07:23, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

GARY KASPAROV
gary kasparov see: Methods for comparing top chess players throughout history so it is safe to say,that he is,one of the best plyer of all time. --217.132.176.43 (talk) 12:44, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

can you check this vandal
Xxxirana (talk | contribs) appears to be spamming —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrcuddlesworth (talk • contribs) 00:29, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Epic
I think the Hamburger edit war is one to go down in Wikipedia history...-- The Legendary   Sky Attacker  05:46, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

A Quick thank you
Thank a lot for reverting that bit of vandalism to my user page, hope things are good with you, all the best SpitfireTally-ho! 07:51, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Ahem!
Philip Trueman (talk) 12:41, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank You
I appreciate4 your vandal fighting efforts. Paticu;ar;y n my user page, It is highly doubtful I would have caught that so I wanted to say TY and keep up the good work. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 13:32, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

My talk page
Hm, looks like ME TOO! Thanks for reverting the idiot IP, I expected he'd try something. Dougweller (talk) 15:45, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Ahem! #2
Philip Trueman (talk) 11:56, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Forum
It seems forum admin Dottydotdot closed the forum due to low traffic. It was like a Wikipedia-freindly version of The Wikipedia Review.--Ipatrol (talk) 20:31, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

User_talk:Heathfieldcc
Please take a closer look at contribs, you may wish to use a higher warning.LeadSongDog come howl 13:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Mexican Revolution
I fixed a minor problem with improper subjunctive and reduced a little wordiness. It was NOT vandalism, and I don't know why you thought it was.

Thanks
You found another one. Good work  Tide  rolls  03:56, 20 June 2009 (UTC) ok

ok
ok
 * ok what? Until It Sleeps Wake me 13:14, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for the confusion
You reverted a redirect I did (then reverted your revision)......part of that was my error. While doing the re-direct, I got logged out, so it was under my IP, not my normal log on. Just wanted you to know it wasn't some random IP editor doing re-directs. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:35, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Raise the Barnstar
I'm still planning on doing more when I get home from my Linux class in like 3 hours as well, so see you guys then.  UntilItSleeps Public PC   16:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Many thanks!
for undoing the vandalism to my user page. Favonian (talk) 13:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!
Hey Until It Sleeps, thanks for removing the vandalism on my user page. Much appreciated! -- Noosentaal ·talk· 15:33, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey
Are you telling me that edits by Loser American(Can) are constructive? 216.222.242.16

Ahem #3
This is becoming annoying: Philip Trueman (talk) 13:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

PurePwnage
What the heck? The edits to the PurePwnage page are not vandalism! They are the truth! Care to explain???

Dont remove messages from other talk pages
dont ever remove my comments from another user's page again. 119.173.81.176 (talk) 21:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Huggle on a Mac
Hey Until it Sleeps, I noticed on the non-Windows OS page of the Huggle page that you can get it to work on Mac OS. I use OS X and I keep getting "Huggle 0.9.1 has exited with an error, have a jolly look at the log window". I've done everything that I can think to do, and I get to the point where X11 will open up IE, but it can't find Huggle on my desktop. Any help you can give me would be most appreciated. Thanks again and happy editing! -T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans  21:08, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, bollocks. Thanks anyway, though. Maybe one day someone will make a version of Huggle for Mac instead of having us try and port it with Wine. Happy editing, -T'Shael, <font color="red" face="High Tower Text">Lord of the Vulcans  21:26, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Fantastic! Thanks for the link. :) -<font color="Orange" face="High Tower Text">T'Shael, <font color="red" face="High Tower Text">Lord of the Vulcans  21:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the revert on User:JimVC3's page. I reverted it at first, tought it was a mistake and undid my revert. I didn't notice it was another editor. So thanks for clearing it up and happy editing;) Schnitzel MannGreek . 21:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Referer
Please do not do this. The name of the header is 'Referer', it was misspelt in the specification. Gurch (talk) 22:06, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Good morning.
What was unconstructive?
 * Uh... this was?... And please sign your posts... <b style="font-family:Segoe Print; color:blue;">Until It Sleeps</b> <sup style="font-family:Segoe Print; color:green;">Wake me 03:50, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the save
Trying to repot the IP abuser ATM. Zhanzhao (talk) 06:20, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Message for "Until it sleeps".
I don't see any other way to contact you and you have yet to respond on the grief porn talk page. Why have you deleted my edits on the talk page? Drive by vandalism followed by unilaterally not allowing any contact and then ignoring repeated attempts to discuss this on the talk page is wrong.


 * Please support your multiple edits removing discussion from a talk page on the grief porn talk page or allow a method to contact you elsewhere.


 * thank you. 99.144.246.51 (talk) 19:18, 27 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the assistance.99.141.251.67 (talk) 17:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Denise Richards
I am not vandalizing the article, I am quoting the Stern interview with her. You may find it offensive, but it is the Howard Stern Show, not Good Morning America. Before you edit anything more, please go read the full interview. You will find that, if anything, I am making it less offensive than it actually was. Under these particular circumstances, if anyone is vandalizing the article, those who wish to sanitize it are. I am simply reporting more accurately what was said. It also has considerable notability because the interview was heard by an estimated 30 million people and made several major news outlets that night because of what she said and how she said it. I am not in the habit of vandalizing other's work, and I don't go editing and reverting articles without a damn good reason. I think you should show the same respect for the writing and reporting of others. Thanks. 72.177.24.26 (talk) 04:54, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Why did you change what this person wrote? If this is a matter of being offensive, they are quoting pretty accurately what was said by Ms. Richards. I am reverting the article back to the previous post. I think that 72.177.24.26 has a good point. Before we go off willy nilly changing things simply because it was contributed by someone without an account, we are teetering on the dangerous edge of censorship. We don't need to go there. I don't see that it is vandalism at all - the interview was controversial and very graphic, and what 72.177.24.26 put in there is accurate as to what was said in this interview. It is also documented properly. It is clearly not vandalism. Themoodyblue (talk) 05:00, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Reverted edits
You sent me a message? You're in my page history but I never saw your comment? That edit was reverted back to its original state, a mistake on my part, the editor had added a bunch of unecessary full stops which I removed. I reverted his/her edits but removed the full stops. I have since apologised to the editor for my mistake.

Stefan Lysenko
I tried to clean up Stefan Lysenko, for which you had seconded a prod. Perhaps we should take it to AfD. Bearian (talk) 21:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * P.S. Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my page. Bearian (talk) 22:17, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for helping preserve an innacurate translation! Linguists everywhere thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.79.248.6 (talk) 12:29, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank You
Thanks for protecting my User Page, appreciate it! - Jeffrey Mall (talk) 15:07, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Geothermal energy in China
I deleted most of the article not to be nonconstructive, but because none of the citations contained any of the information that was written in the article or directly contradicted it. Simply put, there is no way to get the article into shape without almost wholesale blanking and rewriting. I don't appreciate the stock message on my talk page either which asserts, with no apparent sense of irony, that I am new to editing. A look over my contribution history will show the exact opposite. SiberioS (talk) 22:05, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

My bad
Didn't mean to revert you as well. :/ &rarr;  Dylan 620  (Toolbox Alpha, Beta) 02:05, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Toolserveraccount
Hello Until It Sleeps, please send your real-name, your wikiname, your Freenode-nick (if you have one), your prefered login-name and the public part of your ssh-key to. We plan to create your account soon then. --DaB. 16:08, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

My God...
Can you please not accuse me of "vandalism" whenever I remove a redirect? I'm NOT BLANKING A PAGE. Removing all of the content of an article that isn't even an article is NOT blanking a page. I removed two dumb redirects and I've gotten warned both times. I don't know if cluebot is yours or not, but it's flawed. I want to ask you something: Do you agree that "Colonization of the Earth's core" Should redirect to "Earth"? That's a ridiculous redirect! Because I couldn't get rid of it (dumb cluebot) I had to redirect it to the "Earth's Core" which still is a terrible redirect. No page has ANY information about colonizing the earth's core. It shouldn't even exist. Next problem I have: I removed the redirect from exihilation to annihilation. What do you know? Clubot tells me I'm a vandal and being nonconstructive because I made it so a word, that should have an article all it's own, didn't redirect to a page that was written on the EXACT OPPOSITE of the word you were searching for, and only having one mention in it. That's like searching "Axis" and you find yourself on a page called "Allies" and the first sentence says "Allies were the enemies of the Axis." And then trying to remove that redirect so a real article can grow and then getting warned for it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.73.27.17 (talk) 17:47, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Excuse me
But do you know how to get Huggle to run on a Macbook?<font face="Fantasy" color="#36F">Abce2 | <font face="Verdana" color="#09A">Free Lemonade <font face="Papyrus" color="#FA1">Only 25 cents!(Sign here) 20:21, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

a word of advice?
Hey UIP, do you think David Jofre ought to be speedied? I know it needs to go, and I ran out of tags. Feel free to take some action; I'm taking a break. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 20:42, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: Reverting
Faster than ClueBot?!? Hehe, I guess I'm a human super-bot! :D Thanks for the barnstar, I appreciate it a lot. &rarr;  Dylan 620  (Toolbox Alpha, Beta) 21:31, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Deaths in 2009
Hiya, I noticed on a recent revert you did to the above article that it ended up being reverted to a page that said Mike Tyson and Barack Obama had died today! I'm sure you didn't intend that, but unfortunately this is a page that gets a lot of vandalism. Quantpole (talk) 17:55, 7 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I am not sure how this happened; I thought I was reverting the same thing previously. Nevertheless, User:Kingcouey caught this and made it right, so I left a thanks to him at User talk:Kingcouey. Newportm (talk) 17:59, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Big Brother 9 (U.S.)
Hi, perhaps I am missing something, but I don't see how [ this] was an unconstructive edit? Thanks. Plastikspork (talk) 19:03, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Policing
DID YOU READ the inline text and not look at the article??? Incompetent. SO DON'T DO HALF-ASSED policing... the tag was way off base. The length of that summary is about just right. Undo your revert. // 24.62.190.234 (talk) 13:04, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

History of terrorism
how am i a vandal? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.239.38.135 (talk) 18:41, 17 July 2009 (UTC)