User talk:The Tom/Archive 7

File:Alde.gif
I have tagged File:Alde.gif as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add article name to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. MER-C 10:57, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with File:Bc greenparty small.gif
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded File:Bc greenparty small.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 15:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with File:Calogo.jpg
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded File:Calogo.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 20:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Epp 2005logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Epp 2005logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:26, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

FAR notice
Canadian House of Commons has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.

Template for deletion
As you are the creator of the Dominionism template, I'm letting you know that I've nominated it for deletion. The TfD discussion is here if you'd like to comment. Raymond Arritt 21:57, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Smile


Hiding Talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Looking through my past contribs for summat put me in mind of you, so thought I'd say hello, is all. Hiding Talk 21:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Better source request for File:AA_EVX_logo.gif
Thanks for uploading File:AA_EVX_logo.gif. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. OsamaK (talk) 12:06, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Canada Liberal leadership 2006
Template:Canada Liberal leadership 2006 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Morgan695 (talk) 23:15, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

GO Transit
I have just replaced the rail schematic originally entered by you in the article GO Transit, on 21 July 2007, with Template:GO Transit rail system. I have credited you as the original author. The information needed to be updated and now editing both the article and the template is much easier. Thank you for your work. - Secondarywaltz (talk) 23:20, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:John gomery.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:John gomery.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. High on a tree 20:34, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Pcposmall2.png
Thanks for uploading File:Pcposmall2.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Pollypurebred.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pollypurebred.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:18, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Aenlogo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Aenlogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Finegaellogo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Finegaellogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

GO Transit
Since you are currently doing an overhaul on this article, I thought you might like to see how the Province of Ontario lays out the corporate structure in their directory. This is a much needed edit. -Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:23, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Template:Infobox GO Transit rail
As an aside to that, I've been meaning to ask you about these changes to the GO infobox. While the result is nicely formatted, it is difficult for some readers whose eyes may not have great visual acuity (there's too much colour). I was thinking of toning it down by removing the background colour from the text, but retaining it for the line designator (eg - we would see a white "A" with red background, but "Lakeshore West" would be black on white). Thoughts? Mind matrix  18:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

GO Transit
Good job on the clean up. We seem to have had similar thoughts about the clutter. My solution to the schematic Template:GO Transit rail system was to collapse the lines not the entire diagram. Sadly, the program code behind the templates keeps being messed with and at the moment the collapsibles don't match the regular - not too bad, but not quite correct (look at "km" shift). I have posted the collapsible version here with you because I don't want someone else to arbitrarily overwrite your previous work. If you can incorpoate any of what I have done - please do. I respect your maintenance work and will leave this with you. -Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:39, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Note that a problem has now occurred with 'BSkm' at Union Station with BSkm

Speedy deletion of Template:Elections by year
A tag has been placed on Template:Elections by year requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

North Kosovo
You missed some crucial data in your change - Nada Trajkovic e.g. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 22:38, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Nah, you're doing brilliantly fine. The article's now readable. :)
 * Sadly, I don't share your optimism (things will only get better). Cheers. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 08:38, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Members of the 28th Ministry in Canada
Category:Members of the 28th Ministry in Canada, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Black Falcon (Talk) 23:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Big favor - a map
I was wondering, considering that you're experienced a bit in the field, if you could make a map for me, that is the Wikipedia? --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 00:05, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * For the Serbian presidential election, 2008. I had made (as you can see) the map for Serbia, but I need one for the diaspora. I want to depict in which countries (which were all individual electoral units) in the world, or that is mostly Europe, Boris Tadic won and in which Tomislav Nikolic). —Preceding unsigned comment added by PaxEquilibrium (talk • contribs) 01:23, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey, if you don't feel for it - just inform me so that I can search for someone else's help. :) --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 16:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Done myself. :-) --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 18:05, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Unfccc montreal2005 logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Unfccc montreal2005 logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:34, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

CFD notification
A number of categories which you created as subcategories of Category:Members of the Cabinet of Canada have been nominated for deletion/listification. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you, Black Falcon (Talk) 18:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Infobox Kosovo
hi tom I see that in the infobox of User:The Tom/Kosovo you listed the cyrillic name before the albanian latin name I think the albanian latin name should appear first beacuse the majority of the people in kosovo ( more than 94% ) are albanian. When kosovo declares independence the serbian language will be an official language but it will be more of a secondary language, thats why I think the albanian latin should be first ( Please correct me if I am wrong ).Cheers -- Leit z  17:23, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:German politics/party colours/NPD
A tag has been placed on Template:German politics/party colours/NPD requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:41, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

File:Pclogo.jpg
I have tagged File:Pclogo.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 23:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Battle of Kosovo chronology
Why did you remove correct information about the date of the Battle of Kosovo, and restore incorrect information? The Battle of Kosovo did not happen on June 28, 1389 in the Gregorian Calendar or the Julian Calendar or in any other calendar. It happened on June 15, 1389 in the Julian Calendar, which was June 23, 1389 in the Gregorian Calendar, and which anniversary is currently observed on June 28 in the Gregorian Calendar, but only in the 20th and 21st centuries (please study Gregorian Calendar or Julian Calendar if this doesn't make sense to you. Thnx. CheckIntentPlease (talk) 03:36, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Kosovo relations.png
Thank you for uploading File:Kosovo relations.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:40, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Kosovo and Belarus
I have both releases from the MFA and from Lukashenko and neither explicitly mention if they will recognize Kosovo as a state or not. That is what the key factor is for that article; we need explicit messages of yea or nay, instead of just making guess and connections. I am keeping my eye out, but nothing official has come out to say either yea or nay explicitly. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 20:57, 18 February 2008 (UTC)