User talk:The Tortfeasor

Articles for deletion nominations
When you submit an article for deletion, please make sure to follow the steps at Articles for deletion. If you don't include the line that looks like this:

~

your AfD will be misformatted. I have gone back and fixed your two submissions for you already. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:39, 17 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks very much for the links. I was literally just about to start a discussion on your talk page to ask you about that. I'd signed up from my IP so I could nominate these pages, and thought I knew how to nominate a page for deletion, but apparently I did not. Thanks for fixing it for me. Anyway, neither of these pages has been edited since 2009, or has any references, and there is no proof that either exists. The Tortfeasor (talk) 04:43, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Free the Tortfeasor!

 * The Duck Test. "If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and walks like a duck, there's good odds it's a duck." Your behavior indicates that you are User:Infamia, as you appeared and instantly picked up the crusade he and his socks had been carrying. - The Bushranger One ping only 10:47, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * "This page is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not one of Wikipedia policies or guidelines. The duck test does not apply in non-obvious cases. Unless there is such clear and convincing evidence, editors must assume good faith from others." You have not met this heavy burden, as you have not shown "clear and convincing evidence" of anything. Clear and convincing evidence is a high evidentiary standard. Take it from an old Tortfeasor. The Tortfeasor (talk) 14:29, 17 November 2017 (UTC)