User talk:The basque savior

September 2022
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Pope Francis. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 07:18, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Socialist Party (France), you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 16:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I won't stop saying the truth, you're norwegian you haven't read pierre péan's book The basque savior (talk) 19:34, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * If you re-add that information before gaining consensus for it on the article talk page, I will block you from editing. See WP:ONUS.  I'm glad you've started a talk page thread, but you'll need to wait until it concludes with a consensus to include before re-adding it. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I already had put a talk page before but it was removed for some reason The basque savior (talk) 08:16, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to National Rally have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:02, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: National Rally was changed by The basque savior (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88966 on 2023-04-17T09:01:59+00:00

July 2023
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Terrorism in Europe. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:32, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

June 2024
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at National Rally, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 15:02, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on National Rally. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FMSky (talk) 15:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 18:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

you are correct about the bright-line violation. I imagine you are also aware that is likewise involved in the affair:  cf. their identical edits to National Rally on 13 June and 10-11 June and prior:
 * 14:58, 13 June (3RR)
 * 14:17, 13 June
 * 12:04, 13 June
 * 18:35, 11 June (4RR)
 * 18:33, 11 June
 * 17:01, 11 June
 * 23:39, 10 June
 * 17:39, 5 June
 * 10:53, 2 June
 * 12:38, 30 May

Please note that these are *not* their only reverts in the period between 30 May and today, but just those related to one line in the infobox. Also worth noting is that was not involved in the edit-war from 10-11 June. Best, -- SashiRolls 🌿 ·     🍥 17:26, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Hotel Corona de Aragón fire
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Hotel Corona de Aragón fire. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 11:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)


 * It's a conspiracy theory by it's own definition, and it's also really stupid, why would the spanish government defend ETA ? The basque savior (talk) 12:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)