User talk:The history nut

Speedy deletion of Ladislaus I Arpad
A tag has been placed on Ladislaus I Arpad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  seahamlass  15:20, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

ANI in progress
Note that your edits are under review at ANI FWiW Bzuk (talk) 00:08, 30 April 2009 (UTC).

Unsourced changes to articles
Please do not make unsourced changes to articles, as you have done here, , ,. Please take a moment to read WP:RS, WP:V, and WP:CITE. Continuing this behavior may result in a block. Cirt (talk) 09:19, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

October 2010
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Courtland Mead. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 15:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Kristanna Loken
Hi. Regarding your edit to Kristanna Loken, sites with user-generated content like imdb cannot be used as sources under USERG. Nightscream (talk) 23:35, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)