User talk:The industrialist

Hi

Regarding your Advani edit: I agree with this

To answer your point in Advani discussion section:

India's 100 million muslim population was alienated reports from the main muslim newspaper "Milli Gazette" Also there are a large majority of secular Hindus who were against the pulling down of the mosque they were polarised - this section of population drove Advani's party the BJP from power and Congress won the elections in part because of the hardline BJP stance. Advani has not been conviced yet in any court because as Home Minister and with the largest majority in parliment he was the principal lawmaker - With the new regime in New Delhi Cases against him are being reinstated

Happy editing

regards

Lalit Shastri

Hi again read your comment on LK Advani discussion

Hi

I quote from the Milli Gazette because that newspaper represents the views of muslims who were polorised along with the secular Hindus - Where else do you go to find a source that reflects the opinions of many muslins except the Milli Gazette - only the line that is relevant to the milli newspaper gazette, is the one that describes the opinion of India's muslims - I will not quote them when I talk of anything else.

Yor next point I have just this to say: History remember the most significat acts of important individuls - So what was the significant act of Mr Advani - I think the lives of 2000 muslims and many hindus too. - Or maybe we should have the Hindtva version which will remember him for his work as Home Minister which is not quite so outstanding compared to other Home Ministers.

Anway I have no opinion on Mr Advani - I just wish to report in a NPOV manner how his life effected India. If his most signifact act had been something elese then he would have been remembered for that

Lalit Shastri

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lal_Krishna_Advani"

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lal_Krishna_Advani"

Welcome
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia!

Just a few quick tips:
 * Our Tutorial explains how to edit; you can experiment in the test area.
 * We have help pages, and if they don't help (can happen :-), post a question at the Help Desk.
 * Remember that we strive to have unbiased articles.
 * Eventually, you might want to read our Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * Use the "Preview" button below the edit box! It helps you catch layout, format, and spelling errors before saving.
 * To sign your messages (to talk pages, for instance&mdash;like I do below), add four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) to your posts. The software will replace them by your signature and a time stamp when you save the page.

Anyway, have fun improving this encyclopedia! Lupo 20:07, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Re: Ayodhya
You can revert yourself. Here's how to do it: It's easy. Don't mis-use this feature, though, and especially don't engage in "revert wars": two or more authors repeatedly reverting each other's changes is considered bad behavior. In such cases, try to get the other party or parties to discuss the issue on the talk page of the article, or ask some other Wikipedian who's not been involved for help. Lupo 20:07, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * 1) Go to the "history" page of the article you want to revert.
 * 2) Click on the "time and date" link of the version you want to revert to. You will be shown that version.
 * 3) Click "edit this page".
 * 4) Click the "Save page"-button below the edit form.

I am sorry you taught this Guy to revert
This chap (Industrialist) now considers himslef a powerful chap with authority he keeps reverting things he should not while hardly making contributions himself all over wikipedia - For Christs sake why on earth did you teach this fellow how to revert

The Dictatorship of the Revert Button is that the best the RSS can come up with
Now Industrialist joins the fray with the revert button - He has learned the word vandalism which he brandishes with the revert button acting as the supreme censor of the work of others - Please contribute to the page and use your brains however little to debate the argument and improve the page. If you don’t' like the article say so and a discussion can be started within the community - Your use of revert smacks of censorship

Lalit Shastri

Dear Industrialist

Nazi followed the same pattern REVERTING HISTORY to their own thought, so why do you want to wipe out the quotations of the leaders of the RSS just because you are uncomfortable with them. If you are an admirer of this organisation defend it with your little brains if you have any -

If you do not like anything in the article or if anything inaccurate has been said about it then point that out. Your founder wrote how he admired Hitler, the organisation holds mass uniformed rallies and parades, and it has been convicted in the Indian courts for inciting communal riots. Its founder Savakar was the co - accused in the murder of Mahatma Gandhi along with Nathuram Godse. LK Adavani and the RSS family was responsible for the pulling down of a mosque which left 2000 people dead. The riots in Gujarat with a huge loss of life was in part caused by members of this organisation the, The special mission from the Vatican accused this organisation for the murder of Christian missionaries and Hindu converts to Christianity.

Why do you desperately try and hide the above, Do a Google search on this organisation where you will find hundreds of pages from newspaper reports, academic commentators, eyewitness about this organisation.

You must remember history can never be hidden - You can rationalise and justify but you can never change what has happened. If you try to hide history using the revert button which wikipedia being a democratic organisation has given you. You simply insult the intelligence of other wikipedians who are democratic.

Just as you cannot distort history you can never distort the history of edits and discussions in wikipedia to do so will only expose you to ridicule as the community can see both sides of any revert war and make up their own mind

Lilit Shastri