User talk:The kid 666

August 2007
Dear The kid 666, hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Perhaps you didn't realize it, but your recent contribution removed content. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content without a good reason, (which should be specified in the edit summary.) Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia! If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. - Ariel ♥ Gold 09:50, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Dear The kid 666, while I understand your concern about spoilers listed on Twist ending, however, please refer to what Wikipedia is not, specifically with relation to censorship. Users are free to not read what they may find ruin their experiences due to spoilers, but they are not free to remove those from Wikipedia, if they are within the guidelines and policies of Wikipedia. Additionally, please see Spoiler guideline, and after reviewing that, if you'd like to discuss the user of spoilers, feel free to do so on the talk page. However, it should be noted that the spoilers guideline is generally referring to the actual movie/book etc article, and not to a page such as Twist ending that is an article on examples of the technique, and thus, it is appropriate to use what some consider "spoilers" for illustration. I hope you understand! Ariel ♥ Gold 10:00, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Dear The kid 666, I will request yet again that you not remove spoilers from Twist ending, and that you read and refer to the above mentioned policies, as again, the article Twist ending is a discussion about the techniques and methods of adding a twist ending to a literary, or film medium. If you'd like me to place a "Spoilers" tag on the article to allow readers to realize that it may reveal plots, I'll be happy to do so, but please do not remove valid information regarding the techniques that the article is specifically discussing. I appreciate you understanding, but if you continue to remove those sections, you may be at risk for being considered destructive, so again I request you refrain from doing so. Thank you, Ariel ♥ Gold 10:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Dear The kid 666, I have added a tag to the sections you have issues with. I again request that you stop removing the sections, as it is removing valid information pertaining to the article. I again warn you that if you continue to remove sections, you risk being blocked from editing, and I don't want to see that happen, as you seem to be interested in helping. However, in this situation, your personal views are not in line with Wikipedia policies and guidelines, and I'd again request you review the Spoiler guideline, and the What Wikipedia is not guideline. Thank you, Ariel ♥ Gold 10:10, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Spoiler warnings
I didn't remove them. You'll have to ask about it on the article's talk page, I had nothing to do with it. Sorry Ariel ♥ Gold 13:05, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Temper tantrums
On this edit of yours: Don't throw tantrums on talk pages. Keep the schoolyard language to the schoolyard. Thank you. -- Hoary 13:37, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

fuck you motherfucker.there i said it again bitch

The kid 666 13:40, 25 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Fine, you're welcome to enjoy your temper tantrums on your own talk page. But any more silliness with the kidspeak anywhere else will get you blocked from editing. -- Hoary 13:44, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

fuck you you son of a bitch you fucking bastard child.fuck off you little prick.shove the editing up your ass

The kid 666 13:46, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people&#32;as you did at User talk:The kid 666, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Ariel ♥ Gold 13:49, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Blocked You have been blocked for making personal attacks and being incivil for 24 hours. To contest this block, add the text  on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

--Chris (talk) 13:51, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of most expensive films, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of most expensive films was changed by The kid 666 (u) (t) deleting 12391 characters on 2010-08-04T08:34:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 08:34, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of most expensive films, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 08:39, 4 August 2010 (UTC)