User talk:The notorious imp

Hi, I just turned your article (the ball&chain one) into a redirect to "[[significant other".  Is that a problem? ---J.Smith 01:00, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on your article Budning, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Budning is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Budning. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template  to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. –Sommers (Talk) 01:00, 29 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Regarding the message on my user talk page, thanks for responding, and there's no need to apologize for acting in good faith. If the Budning Pharmacy mentioned in Montreal West, Quebec has some verifiable claim to historical interest, then yeah, there shouldn't be any problem with adding information on it to that page. Please let me know if you have any questions. –Sommers (Talk) 17:19, 30 March 2006 (UTC)