User talk:The rev av

Continued edit warring at The Rev
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war&#32;at The Rev. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text. The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 13:37, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Your last chance to keep editing here
WIth this edit you once again tried to force your favored material into our article on The Rev. This is a repeat of what happened back in July, when you were blocked for one week due a report at the 3RR noticeboard. Please undo this change to the article until such time as the other editors support your material. If you don't do so, you may be indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 00:31, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 13:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The Rev, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''You should really stop adding unverified and not-notable content and YouTube links to Wikpedia articles. WP is not a fansite, and your continued reinsertion of that material is highly disruptive. You were warned earlier--this is the last warning.'' Drmies (talk) 18:50, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 18:56, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

When you upload content to Wikipedia you give permission for it to be used by 'anyone in the world to use it under very broad licensing terms, and you cannot revoke that permission. If you are not prepared to upload on that understanding then you should stop contributing to Wikipedia, because there is no alternative way of doing so. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:36, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * When you uploaded the picture, you gave it to Wikipedia with the following license: "This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License." As the image is in use on the article, I'm not sure why you should demand that it be removed. When you do any editing on Wikipedia, there is a message that says "You irrevocably agree to release your contributions under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license" - note the word irrevocably. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 19:37, 7 September 2010 (UTC)


 * You may like to look at OWN. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:38, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:343 Industries Logo.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:343 Industries Logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:50, 10 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO talk 18:50, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

i want to delete a picture that i uploaded to wikipedia
Hello, i have uploaded a picture to Wikipedia that i OWN! i took the picture via backstage! and i changed my mind and i want to delete the picture from wikipedia, but i am blocked, so i cant delete it, im requesting an administrator or anyone to delete the picture as soon as possible! the picture i want to delete is The_Revs_Drum_Kit.JPG‎ and its found on the page of The Rev. thank you very much!
 * You have already legally released the picture under a creative commons license, so there's no reason for it to be deleted. Thank you very much for your release of the photo- like you, I'm a big believer in the value of a creative commons license.  Once you release a work under a creative commons license, you can't revoke the license, since others (including Wikipedia) may already have made use of the work.  Thanks!  -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:58, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Can I point out that both myself and made the same point as FisherQueen when we responded to your unblock requests last week - see above. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 22:13, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

i want to delete a picture that i uploaded
Hello, i uploaded a picture to wikipedia which i own, but now i see many people are downloading that picture and stealing its ownership! i really like to prevent people from downloading it and stealing its ownership, can you help me? thanks!


 * Why do you keep posting this on your own talk page? And you've already been answered above^. ×××BrightBlackHeaven(talk)××× 18:57, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Image source problem with File:Narenjak explosions.PNG
Thank you for uploading File:Narenjak explosions.PNG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:06, 18 September 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗ plicit  11:06, 18 September 2021 (UTC)