User talk:The sunder king/Archive 3

Sounds good:
Alright, task 4 next, but first I need you do answer a few questions:

1. Do you use Twinkle?

2. If not, do you want to get it?

Twinkle is an advanced vandal fighting/multipurpose tool which I personally love. You already know how to revert vandalism manually, so Twinkle just makes it easier. Twinkle will also help you with nominating AfDs, CSDs, PRODs, reporting users to AIV, arning users, requesting protection, etc. --HAL talk 19:36, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

I don't use twinkle, I use popups to fight vandalism. I do not know how to install twinkle though. The sunder king 15:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

WP:TW
It has instructions right on the page, you just put it into your monobook.js file. --HAL talk 01:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, due to a family emergency, I have been forced to take a short wikibreak. If you need any help, please contact Giggy a friend of mine, who was actually my original adopter. I will talk to you as soon as I can, thanks. --HAL talk 20:18, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Andy Cole
Andy Cole hasn't signed for Sunderland just yet. I recommend waiting until the club confirms the transfer. Mattythewhite 12:13, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

The Local media certainly has confirmed it, and he has already been training with them. The sunder king 12:14, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Reverts
Hi, could you please explain why Nick Bussey is notable, and your other reverts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattythewhite (talk • contribs)


 * He is notable. I have heard of him, and I believe he is notable enough to have an article. The sunder king 18:06, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * That is not enough for notability on Wikipedia. Please read WP:BIO. It states "Competitors who have played in a fully professional league, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport such as swimming or tennis". Mattythewhite 18:08, 27 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The leagues are semiprofessional, and Kettering town F.C. is a professional club. The sunder king 18:09, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The league has to be professional. Semi-professional is not enough, and it is irrelevant whether the particular club is professional. There have been many discussions on WP:FOOTY about the notability of Conference footballers, and its always turned against their inclusion. Mattythewhite 18:11, 27 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Since I am contesting the prod. You will have to use WP:AFD as the deletion process. I believe the clubs profession should be the key though. The sunder king 18:12, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Be civil. I've never said anything like this to you and I would like some respect from you at least. The article is non-notable so I have placed it on AfD. Mattythewhite 18:17, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Most of the players of York City are notable as they have played in a professional league, unlike Hussey. Mattythewhite 18:18, 27 August 2007 (UTC)


 * But I think leagues like the conference, north and south should be included because they are notable leagues, its players from leagues below who are not notable. The sunder king 18:19, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Fair enough if you think that. Express your opinion at WP:FOOTY. Thats what its there for. Mattythewhite 18:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

I was talking about WP:BIO, which is a stupid guideline that everyone takes to heart. Because of that guideline, the article would have been deleted anyway even if you hadn't put it up for speedy deletion. ugen64 18:45, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

GA
Sunderland A.F.C.? Looks like a nice challenge. When I want to get an article to GA, I usually go for one thats in a pretty poor state. Mattythewhite 20:33, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

help
Helpme I just created an article on a major news event just 39 minutes after it happened!. South Greece earthquake 2007 Can I be helped expanding it? The sunder king 16:43, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I will post a note.  SLSB  talk  •  contrib   23:42, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually you already posted expand on it. Eventually someone will come clean it up.  SLSB  talk  •  contrib   23:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you very much. The sunder king 17:19, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

2007 Southern Greece earthquake
A template has been added to the article 2007 Southern Greece earthquake, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. – sgeureka t•c 13:19, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Sunderland
They're named on the official websites squad list, so they should be kept. Mattythewhite 14:44, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: John Cage
In fact, the spam protection filter gives you the blacklisted URL, so I searched for it and removed it manually, I admit it, it's a pain in the ass if you're used to semi-automated edits, like I am. Keep up the good work! - Myanw 10:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * It is against wikipedia policy to remove warning templates from your talk page, you may not have know that so i will not issue you another warning. Thank you, Tiptoety 16:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Removal of warnings

 * It's not against wikipedia policy, people can find them in the history if they are that concerned, besides I have two months experience and 1000 edits, its not like I am going to go on a vandalism spree and be blocked as VOA is it? The sunder king 16:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * read this WP:USER, please do not remove, but archive. I may have been a bit in the wrong and am not afriad of admitting it. And by the way, it does not matter to me how many edits you have, i have close to 4,000 so. Tiptoety 17:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I have read it, I am just using the edit count as an example to show I am not going to go on a spree of vandalism and be blocked as a VOA. The sunder king 17:02, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Anyone can be a serial vandal, whether they have 10 edits or 10,000 edits. Anyway, it wasn't a vandalism warning; it was a warning for your personal attack on the people who commented on the 2018 FIFA World Cup AfD! - PeeJay 20:08, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Shanghai infobox
Talk:Shanghai: Was this [ reversion] really necessary? If so, what is the rationale for it? Please reply on that talk page. Thanks, O (说 • 喝) 17:44, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Could you please keep the image the same as the old one. It looks better. The sunder king 20:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure —O (说 • 喝) 20:09, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

NUFC Userbox
Hi, cheers for showing me the Newcastle Userbox... I had a look for one a few months ago, but couldn't find it. This'll go proudly alongside the other many userboxes on my Page! -Toon05 16:23, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Nominated
Hello please see Requests for adminship/Gscshoyru. I have nominated you for adminship due to your 3 year experience on wikipedia, please decline or accept the nomination. The sunder king 20:15, 14 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Decline: Though my account's been around for 3 years, It's only really been active for 3 months -- see this. Also, all I've ever really done is revert vandalism, and I'd like to really contribute to the encyclopedia first. Currently, question 2 would look a little empty.
 * I appreciate it, though. Wait another 3 months or so, if you'd like, when I have a much better grasp on the policies, and have made some substantial contributions to the encyclopedia, to nominate me. But I'd like to be very, very sure that I'd pass the RfA before I'll accept any nomination. And I'm pretty sure that as of yet, it won't pass. But thanks -- you made my day. Gscshoyru 01:47, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Digimon World
I deleted that list for a reason, it was too bloody big. Check the talk page, I left a link to a nonexistant page where the list could be placed. Tyler Warren 09:45, 15 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry I thought it was vandalism, please leave an edit summary when doing such edits. The sunder king 09:46, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh snap I totally forgot about the summary! Sorry! xD! Well I just created the page with the list, feel free to bring it up to Wikipedia standards. Cheers! Tyler Warren 09:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Moved message from your user page
right, i dont know how the hell to contact you any other way than this,

But Bongwarrior BROKE the terms and agreements.

I spent all my god damn time making my wikipedia page to use when i go to wrestling shows and i get deleted.

Yet HE can keep a page where he tells people he smokes pot...yeah very nice. ESPECIALLY when i cant even put him up for deletion.

I want to complain.

Now do your job and REVIEW what he did,

He started on me and i would have been happy leaving him to it, but after spending 2 hours on my page to be able to use for fans at wrestling events, i find it disgusting

PS: sorry for editing your page, as i said, i dont know how else to get in contact with you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevizzle (talk • contribs)


 * The preceding comment was moved from your userpage. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 10:04, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Roundabout
I'm just wondering about your most recent revert to this article - it looks like you caught up some proper edits among the crap. I'm wondering what you were trying to get rid of in particular - it's hard to tell. Wongm 04:02, 21 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I was reverting sneaky vandalism, I relised that some idiotic Ip had put in the history section that "They were technically square" however I didn't relise how many good edits had been put on top, so I shoud have reverted it manually, sorry. The sunder king 08:46, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

EasyScript Speed Writing
Hello, I noticed that you reverted my edits on EasyScript Speed Writing. Did you just misunderstand my goals (to Neutralise the article) or did I just plain vandalise it?Rex Imperator 15:58, 21 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh sorry I must have made a mistake, apologies. I seen the massive deletion of characters without an edit summary so I thought it was vandalism. Feel free to restore your edit. The sunder king 16:36, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Mackem
Hey. I've reviewed the article. I wouldn't say its ready for a GAC at the moment, but you'll have to see after the peer review. Thanks, Mattythewhite 17:33, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry about it
Seriously, don't worry about it. I've been kicking myself for not being able to be on much anymore, and am probably going to withdraw from taking on adoptees at this time anyway. Between school and work, and everything else that's going on, I barely have time to get online anymore. Anyway, good luck in everything you do in the future, and I hope to talk to you soon! --HAL talk 03:16, 22 September 2007 (UTC)