User talk:The true Faithfull and discreet slave

Welcome!
Hello, The true Faithfull and discreet slave, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Kleuske (talk) 16:45, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

COI declaration
Dear Kleuske

I greatly appreciate your soonest reply, the current articles about Jehovah’s witnesses contain numerous references to their teachings taken directly from their journals, the article I edited has clearly been edited by active Jehovah’s Witnesses and perhaps even governing body members themselves, the current article is therefore unbalanced and one sided. I am one of Jehovah’s Witnesses that is not connected with the Watchtower society, I am one of the anointed that the article speaks about anointed by god to fulfill the role of the Faithfull and Discreet slave, which as I pointed out is required to recognize and accept input from ALL anointed Christians, so indeed there is a clear conflict of interest, but based on that reasoning ALL edits made by members of the Watchtower society should be removed, this article should be written by persons who can prove to have NO interest in this religious issue as you’ll quickly realize, if that is the standard applied no article speaking about Jehovah’s Witnesses and their beliefs could exist on Wikipedia.

I greatly appreciate the service that Wikipedia provides, even before I became interested in helping to balance the information available on Wikipedia I made regular contributions to Wikipedia, my contributions have always been modest a mere token of my appreciation but they do indicate that I’m a firm supporter of the neutral reporting that Wikipedia stands for, as current reporting on issues touching Jehovah’s Witnesses is clearly unbalanced, just look at the great number of references that point to literature published under auspicion of its governing body, a critical note is required to balance out reporting. I realize this is a difficult situation and I’m certainly mindful of the voluntueer and non volunteer editors time and appreciate their effort.

From small my family associated with the Watchtower society and so have I for most of my adult life, I acquired logical reasoning skills during my study of law and economics, I have made a thorough study of Jehovah’s Witness beliefs and their method of interpreting the Bible AND I’m in agreement with over 95% of their teachings, most my closest friends associate with the Watchtower society, I feel that even though there is a clear conflict of interest i’m uniquely qualified to bring balance to discussions touching on the Watchtower society, I would be happy to submit all my edits for review before they are published AND I’m willing to limit myself to using the unrevised new word translation of the Bible published by Jehovah’s Witnesses as my only source AND limit myself to the method of bible interpretation that the leadership of the Watchtower Society has developed. I have thorough knowledge of this method, due to the sensitivity of the topic being reported on I do have to insist on remaining anonymous.

Kind regards

The Faithfull and Discreet slave.

The true Faithfull and discreet slave (talk) 17:24, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * "[T]he anointed that the article speaks about anointed by god to fulfill the role of the Faithfull and Discreet slave" are not exempt from Wikipedia's policies. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a WP:SOAPBOX, not even for self-appointed anointed ones. if you make contributions a) make sure they are properly sourced and b) don't blur the lines between articles and sermons. Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 17:34, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:The true Faithfull and discreet slave


A tag has been placed on User:The true Faithfull and discreet slave requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Paleo Neonate  – 19:38, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Unbalanced reporting making Wikipedia an advertisement for Jehovah’s Witness beliefs
This is to contest the speedy deletion request made, the originator of the request is clearly one of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Current reporting on Jehovah’s Witnesses clearly originated from the organization itself and is therefore one sided, due to the worldwide nature and attitudes towards Jehovah’s Witnesses it is impossible to find a truely neutral party so the next best thing is to allow a critical note to offset the current unfair reporting on this issue, if my profile is deleted ALL articles concerning the denomination should be deleted as the many references to the writings of Jehovah’s Witnesses currently make these articles read more like a sermon that an unbiased encyclopedia article, my references will be well referenced to the authority that the Witnesses themselves accept, the holy word of god using their OWN method of interpretation. The true Faithfull and discreet slave (talk) 06:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)


 * I was the one who tagged your user page for deletion. I am not a Jehovah's Witness (or part of any faith).  The page was deleted by an administrator who agreed with my tag (or would have declined it), the related policies are WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:PROMOTION.  User and talk pages should serve to improve the encyclopedia (WP:UP, WP:TPG) and the articles must summarize reliable sources (WP:RS).  Wikipedia cannot be used for original research (WP:OR).  If you would like the JW articles to include more information on notable splinter groups and contentious doctrinal matters, that would be possible; you would need to find scholarly reliable sources about it, then summarize them while including inline references to those.  Thanks, — Paleo  Neonate  – 06:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Pinging, the administrator who deleted your page, in case they would like to comment. — Paleo  Neonate  – 06:46, 28 December 2017 (UTC)