User talk:The wub/archive07

Thank you
Thank you for your vote of confidence in my recent request for bureaucratship. Even though it didn't pass, I greatly appreciate your support and hope I will continue to have your respect. Thank you! Flcelloguy (A note? ) 22:52, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

RFA Thanks
Hi wub. Thank you for your support vote on my RFA. The final result was a successful request based on 111 support and 1 oppose. --CBDunkerson 13:24, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

RFC
Hi, I have started an RFC on User:Go for it! Your input and additions would be appreciated. Requests_for_comment/Go_for_it%21. thanks. -Quiddity 04:58, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Goforit's RFC
Hi, regarding Requests for comment/Go for it!, there has been much editing of the initial statement since you signed it. Please read it again and/or consider changing your edits/your signature to avoid the impression of inadequate procedure. Thank you. Kosebamse 20:54, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Community Justice
This is a notification reminding you all, especially councillors, that we are having a meeting where we will try to review progress so far and make a few decisions.

This meeting will be held on a wikipage, and well end on Saturday 15th April.

You can partake in the meeting here.

Thank you,

Computerjoe 's talk 17:08, 11 April 2006 (UTC) (Chairman of WP:CJ.)

Message delivered through AWB.

Community Justice/Elections
As Community Justice has over 30 members, we are beginning the elections process.

If you are interested in becoming the chairman, the chief executive or councillor please add yourself, and a statement, to Community Justice/Elections.

Voting shall begin on April 24th, and end on May 1st. To see if you are eligible for a vote, please see Community Justice/Elections.

Thank you,

Computerjoe 's talk 21:03, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

CJ election reminder
Hi The wub I noticed that you are not registered for voting or nomination in the CJ elections, and would like to remind everyone that '''all Candidates Must Submit Their Statement By April 23rd. Voting will begin April 24th, and end May 1st'''. More details on how to nominate yourself can be found HERE. I hope to see you at the elections!  • The Giant Puffin •  20:11, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia.org portal design
Wow, thank you for the note about .net magazine -- I'm very pleased indeed that they liked the design! Now if only the site weren't subscription only. If you have the magazine, could you perhaps transcribe the sentence(s) referring to Wikipedia for me? We can put the mention in next weeks Signpost news roundup. :)  Thanks!  &mdash; Catherine\talk 22:46, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Sorry to See You Go
Hey,

I'm sorry to see you leave WP:CJ, though I'd much rather you had discussed it on the talk page.

Regarding another issue, I see you wish to resurrect UKCOTW and I too am interested.

Thanks,

Computerjoe 's talk 19:42, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I have a strict no meet-up policy sorry. Back to UKCOTW, I'm unsure how it is done. Does one person decide the COTW, or do we need a long process of consensus gathering? Computerjoe 's talk 20:05, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Discordian year
I added the dis-year template to Discordian calendar, if that's alright with you. Just wanted to let you know that it's already found a good use. Voretus the Benevolent (T | C) 09:42, Saturday April 22 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I was going to put it there myself now that I tested it. I'm hoping to make a series of discordian date templates, so we can show the full date. the wub "?!"  09:45, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Old Skool Esperanzial note
Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. --Cel es tianpower háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

GA spam on featured template
hi, i see that the "good article" spam has been put back in Template:featured despite objections from several users. this seems to be the way the GA project works: boldly putting something into a page that doesnt want it, then claiming consensus is required to *remove* it again (consensus is never required to put it there in the first place).

this is exactly the same behaviour as witnessed on the attempt to create an article space "good article" star, which i & raul654 finally managed to have deleted (a huge effort since they had already spammed a 1000 articles with it), and on the Community Portal where this non-policy wikiproject has pride of place - its apparently far more important than any of the other dozens of collaborations!

they even had the cheek to remove the "non-policy process" template from the top of their project pages claiming they now had "enough support to be policy" - this is despite clear consensus on the talk page that its NOT policy. an attempt to put it back was quickly removed.

i would appreciate any comments on the template's talk page. i'm really fed up with fighting these GA spam battles everywhere, its quite tiring. why do they have to constantly spread their GA spam everywhere? hope you can help! Zzzzz 09:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Please tell me you're being ironic. the wub "?!"  13:03, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

User notice: happy birthday
Happy Birthday from a fellow Esperanzian, although I suppose it isn't too happy as you have exams. xD ~Chris { tce@ } 16:25, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Happy birthday The wub! Good luck for your exams, all the best! --Ter e nce Ong 08:56, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Happy Birthday
Hello friend. I wish you a very happy birthday. BTW, I learnt of the same from Esperanza. All the best for the coming year! And, all the best for examinations too! --Bhadani 16:29, 29 May 2006 (UTC)