User talk:The wub/archive20

Janet Hilton
I do realize that this article has permission for including material from two specific sites, but the material in question appears on a non-specified site (http://www.rcm.ac.uk/jkcm/?pg=1584&staff_code=103) whose copyright policy states the following: "Material published on these web pages is copyright of The Royal College of Music and may not be reproduced without prior permission." I also cannot find this material on either site that has given permission, and as this person is a professor at RCM (and has been for going on 10 years), it would seem their site is the true source of this text and is therefore infringing content. Could you please clarify your reasoning so I don't mistakenly mark articles for SD in the future. Thanks. AWeenieMan 02:13, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I can't figure this out, took it to Copyright problems. Speedy should be reserved for uncomplicated cases. the wub "?!"  16:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Project Runway participants
I have nominated project runway participants for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Number1spygirl 15:00, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Warning:Javascript security issue
Hi! I need to inform you that I've protected Wikipedia:WikiProject_User_scripts/Scripts/test-enhanced because it allows users to add code to the javascript of other users. If you are an admin, you are still able to edit it, but if you are not an admin, please copy and paste it into your userspace to continue modifying it. We can set up a message at the old javascript page telling users to change their links. If you need help, please contact me or User:Eagle_101. Thanks, --uǝʌǝs ʎʇɹnoɟʇs 00:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

B3ta
Ahoy. A few weeks ago, after news broke that B3ta had initiated a mass campaign to sneakily vandalize Wikipedia images, I saw their page and removed all the unsourced and unverifiable information, vandalism, and cruft. Someone reinstated all this policy-violating content while simultaneously levying a personal attack against me, here, which you then began to build upon. Perhaps it would be best to merge sourced stuff and quality edits you've added, to the last pre-revert version without the unverified claims, self-promotion, and cruft here? --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - &lt;*&gt; 20:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I prefer to work on it this way. the wub "?!"  13:39, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

The Future of WP:40k
Hello. As a member of WP:40K I ask you to share your thoughts and opinions on a matter that I feel will shape the future of the project. Thanks. --Falcorian (talk) 02:07, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

roller coasters
You got to the "Roller coasters at (X)" nomination before I did. I'd argue that these ones deserve special treatment, as their parks have categories:
 * Category:Roller coasters at Knott's Berry Farm to Category:Roller coasters in California AND Category:Knott's Berry Farm
 * Category:Roller coasters at Coney Island to Category:Roller coasters in New York AND Category:Coney Island
 * Category:Roller coasters at Carowinds to Category:Roller coasters in North Carolina AND Category:Roller coasters in South Carolina
 * Category:Roller coasters at Cedar Point to Category:Roller coasters in Ohio AND Category:Cedar Point
 * Category:Roller coasters at Dorney Park & Wildwater Kingdom to Category:Roller coasters in Pennsylvania AND Category:Dorney Park & Wildwater Kingdom
 * Category:Roller coasters at Disneyland Paris to Category:Roller coasters in France AND Category:Disneyland Resort Paris
 * Category:Roller coasters at Galaxyland to Category:Roller coasters in Alberta AND Category:West Edmonton Mall

Want to make these changes to the closing nomination?--Mike Selinker 18:43, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I've changed the listing. the wub "?!"  16:17, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Neat.--Mike Selinker 07:03, 12 November 2007 (UTC)