User talk:Theamazingmacintosh

February 2012
Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to Trdub53 was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 02:33, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Trdub53


A tag has been placed on Trdub53 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Krashlandon (talk) 02:38, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Trdub53


A tag has been placed on Trdub53 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Krashlandon (talk) 02:50, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. MJ94 (talk) 02:51, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Regarding Trdub53
Please read WP:BIO. Youtube editors are generally not notable enough for their own articles unless they are extraordinarily popular or are featured in the mass media several times. Krashlandon (talk) 02:52, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Final warning
If you continue to create inappropriate articles in this project's mainspace you will be blocked from editing.  Tide  rolls  03:03, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Tide  rolls  03:15, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I cannot tell if you are being purposefully disruptive or are just inexperienced. As the result is the same, I have blocked this account indefinitely.  If you can convince another administrator that you can edit constructively within the guidelines and policies of this project, then you might regain your editing privilege.  Tide  rolls  03:15, 1 February 2012 (UTC)