User talk:Theaterbuff123

Your submission at Articles for creation: Renee Brna has been accepted
 Renee Brna, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 11:26, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Renee_Brna help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

A page you started (Renee Brna) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Renee Brna.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Thanks for developing the informative new article on Renee Brna.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 19:55, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Renee Brna un-accepted
An article you recently created, Renee Brna, had an improper review and is not ready to remain published. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

The "Renee Brna" article does meet notability guidelines and the news citations provided can affirm this. I'm still unsure why the articles on an American Broadway and TV actress were taken down due to problems with notability. Theaterbuff123 (talk) 15:14, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

If all of the citations are from non-personal or private business and well-established websites...aka Playbill.com, broadwayworld.com, newspaper website sources about an actress who the theatre community regards as influential in its newspaper sources, then why is this accurate and proficiently cited article not being published? Can you please illustrate examples of what I am doing wrong here? Theaterbuff123 (talk) 02:59, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Renee Brna


A tag has been placed on Draft:Renee Brna, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Hatchens (talk) 12:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Renee Brna
Hello, Theaterbuff123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Renee Brna, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Renee Brna (July 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Missvain were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Renee Brna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Renee Brna, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Renee_Brna Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Missvain&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Renee_Brna reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 23:13, 6 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, thank you for your comments. I have added extra newspaper sources with "Renee Brna" in the title to show that she is notable and featured both in reviews and interviews. Broadway World is scarcely used and only in cases where it shows cast lists to note additional cast members of shows mentioned. I can remove these citations if needed as it wouldn't change the source content.  I have resubmitted, hopefully this will help.  I know not everyone is familiar with American musical theatre actors and actresses, but I hope my contribution adds to the richness of this field. Theaterbuff123 (talk) 03:22, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rick Hanson


A tag has been placed on Rick Hanson, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.spiritrock.org/rick-hanson. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PRAXIDICAE🌈 12:24, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello Theaterbuff123. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Theaterbuff123. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE🌈 12:24, 27 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello Praxidicae,
 * I understand that some of my sentence structure was too closely related to that of what was on spiritrock.com and I am happy to rewrite using my own wording. However, I am not a paid writer for Rick Hanson--he is a Buddhist teacher, expert on neuroplasticity, and should be recognized on wikipedia as a NY Times best selling author of over 7 books. I am a fan of his and I don't think this should inhibit me from creating an article about him. Is it possible to move my article into draft space so I can see what I have already created and rewrite it? I have already spent over 5 hours on this piece and it seems unfair to have all my work wiped out without even a conversation beforehand. Just because you "think" I paid to contribute, it does not mean I AM paid to contribute.  I am just a novice at writing for Wikipedia and needed a little guidance. I wasn't even given ample opportunity to contest the speedy deletion. This really discourages people from contributing to Wikipedia; I'm not sure if that is the goal here. Theaterbuff123 (talk) 17:03, 29 July 2022 (UTC)