User talk:Theatremania/Archive 1

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Night School (play) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Night School (play), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Faustus (Mamet play) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Faustus (Mamet play), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Voices (play) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Voices (play), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Night School (play)


Hello, Theatremania. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Night School (play)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 06:01, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Faustus (Mamet play) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Faustus (Mamet play), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Miss Tourism Queen International


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Miss Tourism Queen International. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Miss Tourism International. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Miss Tourism International – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. BC108 (talk) 19:06, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Oceania Cycling Championships


The article Oceania Cycling Championships has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Johnlp (talk) 23:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Voices (play) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Voices (play), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Voices (play)


Hello, Theatremania. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Voices".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:35, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Randy Stradley


The article Randy Stradley has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * BLP with no independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:48, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Formula Opel


The article Formula Opel has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Machine generated article which confuses racing series, a racing team and a racing driver.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:50, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Randy Stradley
Randy Stradley is almost certainly notable, so a number of editors have worked on the article so that it can be kept. And I noticed that your version had some useful sources, so I have just looked at tehse and put two of them back into the article. But your version was remarkably incoherent, even to having French words and phrases stuck inside it. One or two sentences appear to come from summaries of the plots of comics, and not be about Stradley at all. Are you using an automated program to generate articles from sources? If so, you should know that the English Wikipedia community has rejected that; it is not allowed here. Or were you doing machine translation from a French source? If so, you must credit that French source somewhere, in a footnote if it was a source for certain points, in a statement on the talk page if you actually translated an earlier version of the article on French Wikipedia. Both of these are actually copyright requirements. But please do not use machine translations, either, unless you can then clean up the translation so it is entirely in good English. Poor work like this is a disservice to a living person, Mr. Stradley, and makes unnecessary work for your fellow editors. Write the article in your own words, with footnotes to where you got the information. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:21, 7 September 2016 (UTC)