User talk:Theautomator2017

Welcome!
Hello, Theautomator2017, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Too Young, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Yashovardhan (talk) 21:40, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * FAQ for Organizations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

March 2017
Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Too Young. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should: Thank you. Yashovardhan (talk) 21:44, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
 * Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
 * Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
 * Only add a " red link " if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
 * Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
 * Do not insert external links or references

Nomination of Frederic Schindler for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frederic Schindler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Frederic Schindler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 19:20, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Randall Poster


The article Randall Poster has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. — Non-Dropframe    talk  23:30, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Music supervisors
Our notability standards on Wikipedia are contingent upon a person being the subject of media coverage. A person who works behind the scenes is not exempted from having to get their name into the media just because they're notable "in their field" — because we're not a résumé directory of people who are notable in their field, but an encyclopedia about people who are notable and recognizable to the public. There are lots of jobs one can have where their work might be important in its field, but they simply don't have the depth of public profile needed to actually support a Wikipedia article — and those people simply don't get to have Wikipedia articles.

It's important to understand that because Wikipedia is an article that anybody can edit, we can't guarantee that everybody who edits Wikipedia is always doing so responsibly. Our articles are routinely dirtwashed by "enemies" of the article subject, with stuff like what an evil bastard the person is because he "stiffed" them in a contract negotiation last week or something like that — and without reliable source coverage about him to support the article, we have no way to properly sort out what's true and what isn't. So "no coverage means no article" is not meant to punish those people — it's meant to protect them, because having a Wikipedia article can actually be a double-edged sword with much more negative consequences than you might think. Bearcat (talk) 00:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)