User talk:Thebh2005

Welcome!
Hi Thebh2005! I noticed your contributions to Acroyoga&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

P.S.: I see you've been making infrequent contributions to Wikipedia's Acroyoga article since 2019. I notice that none of your edits have been supported by a citation of any kind. Wikipedia relies for its accuracy and verifiability on the reliability of the sources that it cites. Without sources, an article could obviously say anything at all. We therefore insist on having good sources for every claim. By the same token, we don't allow anyone to link to their own or a favourite website, which might be biased, a personal opinion, or an attempt at advertising. You're incredibly welcome to contribute your expertise on Acroyoga, but ... sources, sources, sources. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)


 * I completely understand where you are coming from, as a Wikipedia reader I also want to know everything is verified to a degree. However, in a case like this, where the activity is niche with no easily accessible online verification, what do you suggest? Any veteran acroyogi knows what I wrote, and it is also taught in acroyoga conventions around the world, but it's not really written in any formal book or release. Thebh2005 (talk) 07:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Many thanks. Wikipedia's policy is that verification must be local to the individual article, so the verifying editor need look only at the citations actually in the article. This means that an article must not rely on any other article for verification, nor on unstated external sources, nor a fortiori on unwritten knowledge held in the heads of "experts". If you think about it, this is a robust and workable policy, and it's hard to think of a better one. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC)