User talk:Thebit.hao

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Nuclear-bomb.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Nuclear-bomb.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 18:16, 11 May 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:16, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Nuclear-bomb.gif
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Nuclear-bomb.gif, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://books.google.fr/books?id=AtEDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA67. As a copyright violation, File:Nuclear-bomb.gif appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Nuclear-bomb.gif has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Nuclear-bomb.gif and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Nuclear-bomb.gif with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Nuclear-bomb.gif.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.

Unfortunately, blogiseverything.com seems to have borrowed this image from a (copyrighted) issue of Popular Mecanics, therefore it is non-free. Be careful of alleged CC images which show they have been scanned (the regular pattern in the background). — Xavier, 22:40, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Comparison of Adobe Flex charts


The article Comparison of Adobe Flex charts has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Per Articles for deletion/Comparison of risk analysis Microsoft Excel add-ins (2nd nomination)/Articles for deletion/Comparison of power management software suites/Articles for deletion/Comparison of XMPP server software/Articles for deletion/Comparison of DNA melting prediction software"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC)