User talk:Thebroderickkeeper

Broderick
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia, which you are more than welcome to do.  (aeropagitica)  15:30, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

The Broderick Keeper
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.  (aeropagitica)  15:37, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Comdr.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Comdr.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Image legality questions. 12:31, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles. If you continue to remove them, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fabricationary 05:01, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jazzle II
A tag has been placed on Jazzle II requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Badgernet   Talk  15:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. BigHairRef | Talk 18:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Please read WP:NFT. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:28, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:07, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Trading Post
Why did you move "Trading post" to "Trading Post"? The naming convention for articles is to use sentence case unless the subject is a proper noun. See WP:NC. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 18:16, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Camp Ranachqua
Thanks for your work on Camp Ranachqua. I've made some changes to bring it more into conformity with Wikipedia standards. Don't forget that all material needs to be verifiable by readers and other editors. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 20:09, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

re:Richard Kiley
Greetings Thebroderickkeeper!

I wanted to stop by and let you know that I just reverted an edit you made to this article. Specifically, it was in violation of WP:WEASEL. In general, it is best to keep articles written in as neutral a tone as possible. You and I may agree that an actor is legendary, but that is purely an opinion, an is not really something that belongs in an encyclopedia article. Rather than just delete, I thought I should stop by and explain that. Any questions, drop me a line. Have a good day wherever you are, and happy editing. LonelyBeacon (talk) 01:05, 29 July 2008 (UTC)