User talk:Thecivilengg

September 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 12:15, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Re: September 2011
Dear Mr. 0llie,

I want to inform you that I am pretty much aware that putting external links doesn't increase the site rank on search engines. I kept the link of the website in the reference as it was fully based on civil engineering. It has just been 1 weeks the site has actually been published for people, but it is getting very good response. It is open source of information and articles on civil engineering. Moreover, you can download freely available books in this site. Watch and subscribe our YouTube. So our main aim is to provide open source information on civil engineering, like wikipedia is doing, without charging any money. Hence, I thought this site "www.thecivilengg.com" would be very much useful for people viewing this page "Civil Engineering". You can yourself thorougly view this website.

Regards, Admin thecivilengg.com

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Thecivilengg


A tag has been placed on User:Thecivilengg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mean as custard (talk) 15:35, 12 September 2011 (UTC) Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company, organization, or clients. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
 * What can I do now?


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, please see how to appeal a block. Peridon (talk) 17:08, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Please note
I also have concerns about "We are the team...". I would point out that not only should usernames not give the impression that they represent organisations, but they should not be for the use of more than one person. Please see WP:USERNAME. Peridon (talk) 17:08, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

This page should not be speedy deleted because...
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (I mean no advertising or spamming. I don't understand why you are trying to speedily delete my account when I applied for a good cause. Have you seen any good websites without advertising and pop-ups providing the information and free materials on civil engineering. I just tried to bring the attention of people reading this articles that we have a site where they could find more details on civil engineering. Just see our blog- blog.thecivilengg.com. There are ASCE and ICE links. Why don't you delete them. Even they represent organization. I think you authorized members of this wikipedia are just being arrogant or showing your monopoly. I kept link with a noble cause to help readers find more on civil engineering. I have nothing to do for myself or my site with keeping link on site ) --Thecivilengg (talk) 19:02, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

I mean no spamming

 * Just to make it clear: you may not put in any links whatsoever to thecivilengg.com. --jpgordon:==( o ) 22:49, 12 September 2011 (UTC)