User talk:Thecodeorg

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! LionMans Account (talk) 17:04, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Basically, there's a lot of stuff here that is subjective. However, there are a few absolutes for articles. One of them is the article can't be copy/pasted from a website. Other than that, the article would have been accepted. I would suggest starting again since the article has been deleted. Main thing is to only use various websites and articles as references to back up what is said here but not copy the text over. LionMans Account (talk) 19:56, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Your current draft of your article
I have moved you current draft of your "The Code" article to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Code (organisation). I have not checked the article for style content or suitability so this isn't an endorsement of the article, another reviewer could still turn it down. Rankersbo (talk) 09:05, 5 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I have, however done a lot of work on fixing and improving the formatting. Please continue working on this version of the article and don't submit more.Rankersbo (talk) 10:07, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rankersbo (talk) 10:21, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has not yet been reviewed. I have, however, improved the headings and references to wikipedia standards.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&. (I think you prefer this title - so I made sure this is the one to be reviewed)
 * To edit the submission before it is reviewed, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, and apologies for any confusion! Rankersbo Rankersbo (talk) 10:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 The Code of Conduct for the Sexual Exploitation of Children in Travel and Tourism, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Jamesx12345 (talk) 22:16, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

June 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that the username you have chosen, "Thecodeorg", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of something other than yourself. Please note that you may not edit on behalf of a company, group, institution, product, or website which relates to the entity in question, and Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are promotional or accounts that are shared. If you are willing to use a personal account, please take a moment to create a new account or request a username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our Conflict of interest guideline and Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. EricEnfermero Howdy! 22:27, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 17:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Logo from The Code of Conduct for the Sexual Exploitation of Children in Travel and Tourism.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Logo from The Code of Conduct for the Sexual Exploitation of Children in Travel and Tourism.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:08, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Here are a few key questions:
 * Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
 * Do you understand conflict of interest?
 * Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. Daniel Case (talk) 16:36, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi Wikipedia administrators. I understand the difference between an encyclopedia and a business directory. The Code.org should be featured on the encyclopedia as it is a notable organisation. I understand conflict of interest. We had our article written by a 3rd party to prevent copyrighted material from our own organisation getting on to wikipedia, the text is original. I believe that our organisation meets the notability standards given by Wikipedia. Before noticing that my username matched the organisation, the article was approved as meeting standards.

Please unblock me so that I can our organisation logo to the page. After that, we do not envisage needing to make any further edits.

Thanks

Iain