User talk:Thecomputernerd01

Speedy deletion of Thecomputernerd01
A tag has been placed on Thecomputernerd01, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Leonard(Bloom) 00:59, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Cheese goat milk"
A page you created, Cheese goat milk, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you.  Mattie TK  02:40, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Quickly, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Quickly was changed by Thecomputernerd01 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-04-03T00:07:25+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 00:07, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page James FitzGibbon has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Kbdank71 15:55, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Fred (YouTube). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 23:56, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Fred (character) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Frankie 0607  13:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Mark Twain. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  Frankie 0607  13:39, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. - Kingpin13 (talk) 15:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Laura Secord, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Laura Secord was changed by Thecomputernerd01 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-04-17T15:39:47+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Thecomputernerd01 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thecomputernerd01 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Thecomputernerd01 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:35, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Josh Chomik


The article Josh Chomik has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Didn't meet any of WP:CREATIVE points, lacks Significant coverage in reliable sources. Challenged since 2014"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &thinsp;&mdash; Ammarpad (talk) 08:06, 11 November 2017 (UTC)