User talk:Thecornkid

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 07:17, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

Proposed deletion of NSFW magazine


The article NSFW magazine has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable magazine lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:NOTBOOK.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ttonyb (talk) 05:51, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of NSFW magazine for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NSFW magazine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/NSFW magazine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  ttonyb (talk) 04:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michael Neff (artist)


The article Michael Neff (artist) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no real claim to notability, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. original research.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:27, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of NSFW magazine


A tag has been placed on NSFW magazine, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  ttonyb (talk) 16:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Michael Neff (artist) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Neff (artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Michael Neff (artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  ttonyb (talk) 04:33, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


 * What would be really useful is references to critical appraisal from a magazine/journal of some standing. This is probably less easy to locate, though, for an artist whose work focus is outside the gallery. I was going to have a look myself later and will add if I find anything, but not necessarily holding out any hope. AllyD (talk) 18:24, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Michael Neff AfD
Hi, the discussion was open for a week and the consensus was to delete the article as it didn't meet Wikipedia notability guidelines. If you like I could provide you with a copy of the article and put it in your user space, for example at User:Thecornkid/Michael Neff. Pages in user subpages shouldn't be deleted as long as they don't violate any WP:BLP guidelines, so as long as you keep the sources in there it would be fine. Then you could expand the article with text from reliable sources (although the main problem with the article was a lack of significant coverage) until it was in a fit state to move back into the article space. BigDom  talk  18:45, 11 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi BigDom. Thank you for your clear and concise explanation. I really appreciate that. Please put a copy of the article in my user space. Thecornkid (talk) 16:56, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kim Beck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 21 September 2016 (UTC)