User talk:Thecreatorch

Speedy deletion nomination of Ronald C Chow
Hello Thecreatorch,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ronald C Chow for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Reb1981 (talk) 02:00, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy deletion declined as asserts significance. However, liked in and self-published works are not useable as references for the article. The google scholar is good. COuld use more soucing unconnected with subject.Dlohcierekim (talk) 02:34, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Ronald C Chow, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. ''It is not your decision to remove tag. It will be determined by an admin. '' Reb1981 (talk) 02:12, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Ronald C Chow
Hello, Thecreatorch,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Ronald C Chow should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Ronald C Chow.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Reb1981 (talk) 02:44, 9 May 2017 (UTC)