User talk:Thedeadmanandphenom/Archive 1

June 2007
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page The Undertaker on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bmg 916 Speak 18:25, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Bmg 916 Speak 19:12, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to The Undertaker, you will be blocked from editing. Bmg 916 Speak 19:17, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

RE: The Undertaker
Now, if you asked me calmly and civilly the first time, I would have replied right away. Now, in answer to your question. I reverted your edit because you changed a subheading of the article (the one name Legacy) and changed it to Undertaker. The Undertaker is the name of the article, and it would be repetitive to title subsections the same thing. Not to mention "Undertaker" doesn't describe that subsection of the article as well as "Legacy" does. I hope this helps explain things. Please remember to be civil from now on when communicating with other editors, it makes things much less tense, and much easier. Happy editing! Bmg 916 Speak 19:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You didn't offend me, not at all, no worries. Just remember for the future. Now that I think about it, I guess I don't really have a favorite wrestler to be honest. I dunno, never really thought about it much. Bmg 916 Speak 19:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --P4k 22:54, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. --P4k 22:58, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Sara Calaway
I understand your concern for the correctness of the Sara Calaway article. Please be assured that the Wikipedia community does everything it can to ensure that all articles are encyclopedic in nature. That means that the article is factual, based on verifiable sources and that it is a noteworthy topic. In fact, the strength of Wikipedia is that many people collectively work together to write and improve articles. Just take a look at the history tab of any article and you will see the large number of people who have worked together to make each article what it is.

Your comment on the Talk:Sara Calaway talk page requesting that no one should edit the article is contrary to Wikipedia policy and its basic principles. No Wikipedia article is "owned" by any one person ... all articles are owned by the community as a whole. So it must be with the Sara Calaway article. If you cannot accept this, then I suggest that Wikipedia is not for you. Truthanado 00:20, 24 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Please do not delete tags (they appear within {{}} ) that are placed on articles by others like you have done multiple times on the Sara Calaway article. It is against Wikipedia policy. More importantly, the tags are there with the goal to improve the article. Take a look around Wikipedia and you will see several articles with tags on them requesting cleanup, additional sources, etc. Although they seem negative, these tags are actually a positive thing, and trigger the Wikipedia community to improve the article. Also, please do not sign the article as you did when you removed the tags. A record of you and your edits is in the history tab of the article. Truthanado 02:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Putting pictures in articles
Don't be so hard on yourself. We were all apprentices once. To put images in an article, see Images. Please note the rules concerning copyright - they are strictly and quickly enforced. Good luck. Truthanado 02:25, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Undertaker in a Screenshot in 2004.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Undertaker in a Screenshot in 2004.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 15:09, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Sara Calaway
A "" template has been added to the article Sara Calaway, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If the article is not substantially improved then it will go to AfD, only removed the PROD once improvements have been made. Darrenhusted 17:57, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Do not revert my improvements, the article was poorly written with terrible spelling and grammar error, not to mention bad wikilinks. You are not helping this article. Darrenhusted 18:01, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

I suggest you remain civil, if you look at the history you will see I improved the page first, so that it may succeed in beating a PROD or AfD, and by saying "you jerk. i hope you burn in hell." you have shown me that you clearly don't read user pages, otherwise you would have noted I'm an athiest, and so don't believe in hell. But I do believe in signing on talk pages.

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Darrenhusted 18:10, 24 June 2007 (UTC)