User talk:Thedeathking

October 2009
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you.  Esa nchez (Talk 2 me or Sign here) 04:07, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:UsersKTBoyPicturesiPhoto20091011images.jpeg
Thank you for uploading File:UsersKTBoyPicturesiPhoto20091011images.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock  (T ALK ) 06:12, 19 October 2009 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fastilysock (talk • contribs)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:25, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to N.W.A. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:10, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to N.W.A. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I'm not aware of there ever having been any sort of official "leader" of N.W,A, and you have failed to provide a source substantiating your claims about who was "the leader." Beeblebrox (talk) 01:29, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:TimbalandtourImages.jpeg
Thank you for uploading File:TimbalandtourImages.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 03:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of MTV's Greatest Mcs Of All Time


The article MTV's Greatest Mcs Of All Time has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no proper assertion of notability. MTV constantly hosts one-off programs and lists; not all are notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 00:44, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments. The next time you make a personal attack&#32;as you did at User talk:Airplaneman, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Airplaneman talk 04:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Re: your message: been there, done that (or whatever the phrase is). Point is, I've been mad. And sad. But Wikipedia is not the place to vent. Sorry; maybe you could vent by reverting vandalism? Tell me if you're interested ;) Airplaneman  talk 04:25, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 04:35, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of MTV's Greatest Mcs Of All Time
I have nominated MTV's Greatest Mcs Of All Time, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/MTV's Greatest Mcs Of All Time. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ironholds (talk) 04:42, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Because there is no evidence that it passes our notability guidelines, and because even if it does it is ridiculous to have every silly list channels like MTV projectile vomit out into pop culture. Ironholds (talk) 04:47, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * What information and what talkpage? Ironholds (talk) 04:52, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with MTV's Greatest Mcs Of All Time. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.  Esa nchez (Talk 2 me or Sign here) 05:40, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Err.. what about? Ironholds (talk) 05:54, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Show & Prove has no evidence of notability, and has been redirected. Can I ask you to sign your comments, please? Ironholds (talk) 06:06, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 06:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Show & Prove. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 06:19, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Welcome to Wikipedia!

 * Read the links! I've responded on my talk, Airplaneman   ✈  22:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Help
You need to categorise it and add an appropriate infobox for a start. Ironholds (talk) 21:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You don't make it, you find it here. Please remember to sign your comments, and divide them up using : like I'm doing here. Ironholds (talk) 21:35, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

RE:
No problemo. The page could still use some additional info and touching up though. --Blastmaster11 (talk) 04:54, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Just stopping by
Hey, I saw you while patrolling recent changes; it's great to see you've stayed to help out. Keep it up; I'm always open to questions! Airplaneman  ✈  21:56, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Airplaneman  ✈  23:35, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Imsohoodremix.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Imsohoodremix.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 03:34, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Fatjoeflowjoe.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Fatjoeflowjoe.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:39, 9 September 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  05:39, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to the talkpage Talk:Busta Rhymes, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tb hotch Ta lk C. 23:04, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the article Talk:Busta Rhymes. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tb hotch Ta lk C. 23:05, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Busta Rhymes, you will be blocked from editing. Tb hotch Ta lk C. 00:47, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disuptive editing at Good articles and Talk:Busta Rhymes. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Look, I don't know whether you genuinely think that that's how articles become "good articles", or whether you're being deliberately disruptive. For that reason I've opted for a short block. But you really need to start paying attention to warnings. If there's cause for a block in the future it will be for longer. TFOWR 00:57, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry
Can someone review the Busta Rhymes Article.

Good article nomination of Ludacris
Hello, I see you keep trying to add Ludacris to Good article nominations. The way the page is set up now, no editor needs to edit that page to nominate an article. If you do so, you will just be reverted by the bot. Please read the instructions at the top of the page for how to properly nominate an article. However, I strongly recommend you don't nominate that article yet. It's got a lot of problems and is extremely unlikely to pass GA at the moment. I see that you haven't edited the article (or not recently anyway). It would be much better, if you want the article to improve, to actually go and work on the article to try and fix some of the problems. It needs expanding in some places, and a lot more references to reliable sources. The lead also needs expanding. See some of the notices on the article for where there are problems. But, it's really not ready for GA yet. Let me know if you have any questions, -- Beloved Freak  10:13, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

John Cena vs. The Rock listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John Cena vs. The Rock. Since you had some involvement with the John Cena vs. The Rock redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). - Sir Pawridge talk contribs 10:56, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nigga, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Shootbamboo (talk) 05:23, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Dwayne Johnson Vs John Cena listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dwayne Johnson Vs John Cena. Since you had some involvement with the Dwayne Johnson Vs John Cena redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so).  JC  Talk to me My contributions 05:40, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Cena vs. The Rock


A tag has been placed on John Cena vs. The Rock requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, image description page, image talk page, mediawiki page, mediawiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, or user talk page from the article space.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DASHBot (talk) 12:13, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

June 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Widr (talk) 04:34, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Hello, I'm Ringerfan23. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Guns N' Roses without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RF23 (talk) 19:18, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Vital articles/Expanded
Hello,

You proposed adding George S. Patton to the expanded vital articles list. Please expand your rationale to include a reason why. p b  p  21:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Doomguy and Doom Slayer
Hi there! I had to revert the edits you made to these articles and undo your attempt to move the content from one article to the other. You need to start a request for move and allow a discussion to take place before moving articles like this. You also did not perform the move correctly when you cut-and-pasted the content from one article to another. This method of moving articles and pages would've resulted in the editing history being fragmented and split across multiple pages, which is not proper. Please request this move, and upon approval and consensus, someone else will perform the move and do so properly. Thanks :-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:38, 22 March 2020 (UTC)