User talk:Thederpinator

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 07:35, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

March 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Judaism, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''You changed the meaning of a sentence to suggest all the critics support the DT, which isn't the case, and made a major change in the first sentence which seems to have no justification. '' Doug Weller  talk 13:24, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Your blanking of text at Amalek
You claimed that the text was biased and that it didn't belong in a section on commandments although it was about a commandment. We allow criticism, which is what I presume you mean by bias, and of course it was in the appropriate section. Doug Weller talk 13:30, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

And finally, I hope
Please read Assume good faith. You're very inexperienced and clearly don't understand our policies and guidelines, but insulting editors is obviously a bad idea. Doug Weller talk 13:32, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Apologies, I forgot something
At Tower of Babel you wrote "However, the confusion of tongues in Genesis 11:1 could be interpeted as figurative whereas Genesis 10:5 could be seen as literal." Without a source this looks like original research which is forbidden. Doug Weller talk 13:34, 18 March 2019 (UTC)