User talk:Thedoubleunit2016

Conflict of interest: You must declare paid compensation if you receive it
Hello, Thedoubleunit2016. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Knight Architects, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:35, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Max de Rosee
Hello Thedoubleunit2016,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Max de Rosee for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:52, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Claire Sa


The article Claire Sa has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * no indication of independent notability. All the references given are either from the company website or about the company.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 15:02, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Adding directory entries and further references to what the company is doing does nothing to establish an independent notability of this partner. You would be better concentrating on the company article rather than adding more into this article. noq (talk) 15:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Final warning
Your editing has been heavily promotional, and I've just gotten done cleaning it up. The "articles" you created are now deleted; we do not allow promotional material. I see that you have already received a warning regarding conflict of interest above. Before you edit again, please answer here with a clear "Yes" or "No" to the question "Are you being paid, compensated, or employed to edit Wikipedia?" If the answer is "Yes", please also make the required disclosures, again before making any other edits. Regardless, please note that all material on Wikipedia must be neutral in tone and content, and may not promote anyone or anything. If you ignore the above, you will be blocked from editing. Seraphimblade Talk to me 16:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Knight Architects (February 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Thedoubleunit2016/Knight Architects and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  21:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Knight Architects (March 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Thedoubleunit2016/Knight Architects and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 14 March 2017 (UTC)