User talk:Theduke202020

November 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Leuchter report, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 02:53, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

It’s literally not incorrect information. It’s a scientific study. Theduke202020 (talk) 02:56, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Leuchter report, you may be blocked from editing. ''Wikipedia is not a platform for pseudoscience or other fringe theories, such as Holocaust denial. Do not remove this information a third time. Grayfell (talk) 03:04, 19 November 2020 (UTC)'' Grayfell (talk) 03:04, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

It isn’t a fringe theory, it’s a scientific report. Plain and simple. The truth is vandalism apparently. Theduke202020 (talk) 03:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Liz Read! Talk! 03:12, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Liz Read! Talk! 03:13, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

You’re evil. Theduke202020 (talk) 03:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I follow Wikipedia policy that has been developed over nearly 20 years. I suggest you follow it as well or you might be facing longer blocks. This is a collaborative editing project and to function, we need guidelines and rules. Liz Read! Talk! 03:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.