User talk:Thee binbag

March 2018
Hello, I'm Amorymeltzer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 311 (number) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 20:29, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Tiffin School has been reverted. Your edit here to Tiffin School was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3xcybdis1k) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:36, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kingston Grammar School. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:49, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kingston Grammar School was changed by Thee binbag (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.910811 on 2018-03-20T20:49:13+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Ayoade, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Richard Ayoade was changed by Thee binbag (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928423 on 2018-03-20T20:51:31+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:51, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lee Mack. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Lee Mack was changed by Thee binbag (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.984439 on 2018-03-20T21:02:56+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:02, 20 March 2018 (UTC)


 * please remove talk page access Septrillion (talk) 21:32, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.