User talk:Thefixerwiki

DMARC
Good stuff! For a 'giggle' have a look at what it looked like a couple of months ago, before I took a machete to it: (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=DMARC&oldid=867729420) - Snori (talk)

I appreciatre it
This is my first go at Wikipedia and I am somewhat challenged. Thank god you took up some slack from the original version. I did think it look different to what i read years ago :-)

I din;t know the rules, but I have a lot to published

Anyway I hope we can work together on demystifying this definition and the surrounding implications.

Cheers....

Thefixerwiki (talk) 00:32, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
 * First go!? Congrats then, that's a pretty impressive first couple of edits. Good to see comments in your changes too. I imagine we won't agree on everything, but I'm sure we agree on "demystifying this definition". I came to the article to help me implement DMARC at work - and left knowing less. Hence, research and a trim/simplification/clarification. But I'm sure this can be taken much further. -Snori (talk) 01:04, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

I just lost my reply
Thank you - I remember reading the published definition years ago and knew it had changed for the better, nice one.

There is still so much to do - I will circle back a later (months most likely) Thefixerwiki (talk) 00:34, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

I agree - but that's the beauty of improving - seeing each others POV

Chat soon i hope

I'm sorry I disagree - DMARC is represented by a DNS entry however
The purpose of the record is to prevent illegal use of a domain using the authentication protocols discussed. DMARC represents what the domain owner's intention is and then the receiving server should act upon instruction contained within the record. The record itself actually makes the domain owner accountable. The receiving server do not have a decision to make they are following instruction. Thefixerwiki (talk) 19:26, 2 June 2019 (UTC)